190 likes | 203 Views
This research examines how to characterize urban sprawl and its implications using various data sources such as Urban Audit, CLC, and soil sealing. It analyzes urban form, percentage of built-up area, compacity index, dynamics, and more, in order to gain insights into the scale dependency of the process and the differential patterns of urban development in cities like Madrid. The study also emphasizes the need for improved delineation methods and visualization tools for dynamic processes.
E N D
Where does the city start? Urban sprawl and compacity Jaume Fons-Esteve (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) Evidence on European Land Use, 24 May, 2010
Delineation of cities Administrative Agglomerations (END - DG ENV) Urban Audit (Eurostat) Functional UMZ (EEA) Morphological
Paris City center (UA) CLC 2006
Paris City center (UA) City (UA) Kernel (UA)
Paris City center (UA) City (UA) Kernel (UA) UMZ
Paris City center (UA) City (UA) Kernel (UA) UMZ LUZ (UA)
Data Soil sealing (1) Resolution Urban Audit (1) CLC (3) Extension & Coverage
Implications of different resolution (=) - Urban Audit + CLC
Urban sprawl • Urban form/pattern • Percentage of built-up area • Soil sealing per capita • Compacity index • Mixed uses • Proximity: distance of patches to city centre (normalised accumulated distance) • Dynamics (absolute and comparison centre-peryphery) • Relative increase of built-up area • Land take per capita • Degree of redevelopment • Use of new built-up areas
Differential urban patterns: Madrid Residential areas Commercial and industrial areas
Conclusions • Need to improve our understanding of scale dependency of process (not simple aggregation) • Use the right delineation fit to purpose of analysis • Data: socio-economic data available at grid level • New visualization tools for dynamic process