1 / 18

Crossing the River – Bridging & Sharing Data to Make Transition Successful

OSEP National Early Childhood Conference, Washington D.C. December 8, 2008. Crossing the River – Bridging & Sharing Data to Make Transition Successful. Kala Surprenant U.S. Department of Education Office of the General Counsel. Early Childhood Transition – Why it matters.

nicole
Download Presentation

Crossing the River – Bridging & Sharing Data to Make Transition Successful

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. OSEP National Early Childhood Conference, Washington D.C.December 8, 2008 Crossing the River – Bridging & Sharing Data to Make Transition Successful Kala Surprenant U.S. Department of Education Office of the General Counsel

  2. Early Childhood Transition – Why it matters. Meeting the needs of toddlers with disabilities and their families. State and local data--Connecting APR Indicators C-8B and B-12

  3. SPP/FFY 2006 APR Transition Data Challenges -- • 31 Part B States reported data systems inadequate to collect and report this data. • Lack of coordination between Parts C and B. • Lack of or Inconsistent policies, contracts, or interagency agreements.

  4. PART C lead agency must ensure for toddlers with disabilities that it-- • Notifies the LEA. • Conducts timely transition conference. • Includes transition plans in the IFSP with steps and services. • Reviews the toddler’s options from 3rd birthday through remainder of school year.

  5. Notification • Who is Notified? Notify the LEA where the toddler with a disability resides. IDEA 637(a)(9)(A)(ii)(I) . • What Must Notification Include: Child find information which is the child’s name and date of birth, and parent contact information. • Opt-Out Policy Option: State may adopt an opt-out policy but must notify LEA unless parent opts opt. • Does Notification = Referral? Initial referral under Part B triggers notice under 34 CFR 300.504(a).

  6. Opt-out Policy must address -- • When parents will be notified. • How parents will be notified. • The length of time parents have to opt out. • How parents can opt out (orally/ in writing). • Content of Notice to include: • The information to be disclosed (child’s name & date of birth) • Right to opt out of disclosure. • The time period for opting out • How parent can opt out (orally/in writing).

  7. Timely Transition Conferences for toddlers potentially eligible for Part B • When? Between 9 months and 90 days before toddler’s 3rd birthday (IDEA 637(a)(9)(A)(ii)(II)) • Who? Parent, Service Coordinator, LEA rep. • How? • With family approval • Can LEA notification=Invitation to LEA? Yes. • Need consent to disclose PII to LEA unless lead agency is SEA or LEA. • Copies of most recent IFSP and evaluation may be useful for LEA.

  8. Transition Plan in the IFSP • Must identify appropriate steps and services (IDEA 636(a)(3) & (d)(8), 637(a)(9)(C)) • Families are included in development of transition plan (IDEA 637(a)(9)(A)(I))

  9. Reviews toddler’s options from 3rd bday through school year • Review toddler’s options from 3rd bday to end of school year (IDEA 637(a)(9)(B)). • Beyond age three, lead agency can provide: • Part C services under IDEA 635(c) extension option OR • FAPE under 638(3) or 619 (ESY under 34 CFR 300.106).

  10. Part B must ensure for toddlers transitioning from Part C-- • LEA participates in transition conference. • IEP in place by third birthday. • Service Coordinator invited to initial IEP meeting (parent request). • Consider IFSP when IEP team develops initial IEP.

  11. LEA must participate in transition conference • LEA representative must attend transition conference held by lead agency (IDEA 612(a)(9) and 34 CFR 300.124(c)) • LEA may seek to obtain consent for evaluation and/or disclosure of PII to lead agency.

  12. IEP by 3rd birthday for children transitioning from Part C. • FAPE BY AGE 3 (IDEA 612(a)(9), 34 CFR 300.101(b) and 300.124(b)). • Evaluation conducted in a timely manner -- IDEA 614(a)(1)(C) and 34 CFR 300.301(c)(1)). • Initial IEP meeting within 30 days of eligibility determination (34 CFR 300.323(c)(1)). • IEP Developed and Implemented by 3rd Bday.

  13. Initial IEP meeting requirements • Inform parent of right to invite service coordinator (SC) and invite SC if parent requests. (IDEA 614d)(1)(D) and 34 CFR 300.321(f) & 300.322(b)(1)(ii) • IEP Team of Initial IEP must consider IFSP if developed under IDEA 636 using IEP procedures under IDEA section 614.

  14. Interagency/Intragency Agreements • Start notification as early as feasible. • Role of SICC – IDEA 641(e)(1)(c) in advising on transition. • Specify who within lead agency or SEA will notify the LEA. • Identify method(s) of coordination between school districts and service coordinators. • Clarify when notification = referral. • Compare eligibility definitions, including developmental delay, under Parts C and B of IDEA.

  15. Late Referrals to Part C • Within 45 days of child’s 3rd birthday – no requirement to evaluate/assess or conduct transition. May refer to Part B. • Within 90 or 135 days of child’s 3rd birthday- • Must conduct evaluation & assessment & initial IFSP meeting. • LEA notification. • Transition plan at initial IFSP meeting.

  16. Key Lessons - LEA notification systemic and timely. -Lead agency -- Opt-out on file. Protocols to share most recent evaluation & IFSP by transition conf. Developmental delay definition. Use of existing evaluation records. Contact b/t svce coord & LEA rep.

  17. Recommendations • Interagency agreements or MOUs. • Contracts with EIS providers. • Consent and IFSP forms at transition under Part C. • Consent forms - Part B. • Data-sharing protocols.

  18. Questions?Comments? Contact: kala.surprenant@ed.gov

More Related