410 likes | 573 Views
Impact of Energy Efficiency Services on Energy Assistance. NEUAC Conference June 18, 2014. Presentation Overview. Introduction NJ Comfort Partners Program NJ Universal Services Program Interaction of Affordability and Efficiency Programs NJ CP Affordability Impacts
E N D
Impact of Energy Efficiency Services on Energy Assistance NEUAC Conference June 18, 2014
Presentation Overview • Introduction • NJ Comfort Partners Program • NJ Universal Services Program • Interaction of Affordability and Efficiency Programs • NJ CP Affordability Impacts • Universal Service Impacts • Summary 2
NJ Comfort Partners • Most jobs are joint electric and gas delivery. 5
NJ Comfort PartnersService Delivery Partners • Five service delivery contractors. 6
NJ Comfort PartnersParticipant Partners • Low-income households 7
NJ Comfort PartnersParticipant Partners • Low-income households 8
NJ Comfort PartnersParticipant Partners • Owners and renters 9
NJ Comfort PartnersParticipant Partners • Single and multi-family 10
NJ Comfort PartnersProgram Benefits • Measures installed 11
NJ Comfort PartnersProgram Benefits • Measure expenditures 12
NJ USF Program • Goal: improve affordability of natural gas and electric bills for low-income households • Eligibility • 175% of Federal Poverty Level • High energy burden • >3% burden for natural gas, or • >3% burden for electric, or • >6% burden for electric heating • Application • Joint for LIHEAP, USF, and WAP • Year round application 14
NJ USF Benefits • Target 6% Energy Burden • Maximum benefit of $1,800 • Monthly credits applied directly to natural gas and electric bill 15
NJ USF Benefit Calculation • Annual income: $10,000 • Burden targeted at 3% of income • Estimated gas bill: $1400 • LIHEAP benefit: $500 • Net gas bill: $900 • Targeted bill: $300 • Annual subsidy: $900 - $300=$600 • Monthly credit: $600/12=$50 16
Program Coordination • Energy Efficiency Programs Linkage Options • Refer • Target (NJ CP method) • Requirement for participation • Linkage Advantages and Disadvantages • Advantage: reduce ratepayer subsidy • Disadvantage: may not all be the highest users 18
Coordination • LIHEAP/Utilities/BPU • Program administered by LIHEAP office (DCA) • LIHEAP/USF application has income and heating fuel • DCA pays LIHEAP grant to utilities (annual credit) • Utilities furnish information on annual energy bill • DCA computes USF benefit and informs utilities • Utilities furnish USF benefit (monthly credit) • Utilities are reimbursed for USF from SBC fund • Usage Reduction • Comfort Partners / USF – Targeting coordination 19
Complications • Maximum Annual Credit • $1,800 • Energy Burden Target • 6% • Annual Credit Adjustment • Benefits accrue to customer in short-term 22
Example Impact #1 All benefits to ratepayers. 23
Example Impact #2 Benefits split between customers and ratepayers. 24
Example Impact #3 All benefits to customer. 25
Example Impact #4 All benefits to ratepayers. 26
Summary 39
Findings • Interactions between usage reduction and assistance benefits are complicated • Charges down • Assistance payments down • Benefits to ratepayer and customer 40
Contact Jackie Berger, Ph.D. President and Co-Founder APPRISE 32 Nassau Street, Suite 200 Princeton, NJ 08542 609-252-8009 jackie-berger@appriseinc.org www.appriseinc.org 41