250 likes | 457 Views
Working Effectively with Veterans in the Community. John Straznickas , MD VA Medical Center, San Francisco Department of Psychiatry, UCSF. Specific ways to increase SUD treatment effectiveness with veterans. Cross-Cultural “Military” Sensitivity Special Issues with PTSD.
E N D
Working Effectively with Veterans in the Community John Straznickas, MD VA Medical Center, San Francisco Department of Psychiatry, UCSF
Specific ways to increase SUD treatment effectiveness with veterans Cross-Cultural “Military” Sensitivity Special Issues with PTSD
Military Culture Take-Home Points • Make an effort to ask and learn about what the military was like for your patient. • Know some basic language • Don’t hesitate to have them teach you • Identify what is your patient’s view of his/her military or veteran experience • Examine your own biases • Assess for weapons
Basic Military History • Which Branch did they serve in? • They are NOT the same! • Peace-time or war-time service? • Active Duty, National Guard or Reserves? • What was their job/MOS? • Involved with combat? • Fire-fights, “being shot at”, mortars. • Cooks and truck-drivers saw combat • Unwanted sexual advances? • A major risk factor for military women
Not all veterans view their military service the same Individual differences Cultural differences – Vietnam vs. OEF/OIF
Viewing the Military as a Culture • Cultural values • Honor • Respect • Leave no brother behind • Protect yourself - weapons • Chain of command • Follow orders
Veteran as a ‘Racial’ Identity • Helms’ Racial Identity Model • Conformity • Dissonance • Immersion/Resistance • Internalization • Integrative Awareness Slide courtesy of Sam Wan, Ph.D.VA Medical Center, SF
Challenging Ways that Veterans Can Present to Community-Based Programs • Conformity –Devalues the military and emphasizes the civilian life • Dissonance –Ambivalent about the two ‘cultures’ • Immersion/Resistance –Idealization of the military and denigration of the civilian culture
Using this Model toFacilitate Treatment Engagement • The ‘conforming’ veteran • Don’t challenge the devaluing…but, • Don’t actively join the devaluing • The ‘dissonant’ veteran • Use Motivational Interviewing techniques to explore the ‘yes-but’ communications • The ‘immersion/resistance’ veteran • Don’t challenge the devaluing…and, • Focus on the present problem and solution
Examine Your Own Biases • Your view of war • Your view of the soldier • Your view of perpetrators of violence • Your view of perpetrators of atrocities
Weapons Assessment • Assume that the veteran has one or more weapons • Assume that their weapons are an important part of their identity • Ask specific questions about how they store the weapon/sand the bullets • Ifsuicidality or danger to others is present, negotiate storing weapons (or just bullets) with a friend and/or getting a trigger lock.
Special Issues with Traumatized Veterans Substance Use Disorders (SUD) Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Take Home Points for SUD/PTSD • 3 C’s: Complex, Confusing and Crisis-prone • Don’t blame them or yourself • Expect an erratic therapeutic alliance • May take multiple treatment contacts • Expect more crisis management, more relapses and the need for repeated intensification of treatment structure • Have a good relationship with clinical staff at substance abuse day hospitals and substance abuse and/or psychiatric inpatient units
Therapeutic Alliance is the primary treatment goal Reduces distress Discouragement with poor outcomes
More Difficult to Treat … PLUS Worse Outcomes with SUD/PTSD pts • Fewer clinical improvements, more crises • Uneasy alliance, negative counter-transferences • Poorer compliance with aftercare treatments • Shorter time to relapse post-treatment • Drink more on drinking days • More medical and interpersonal problems • More homelessness • Druley and Pashko 1988, Nace 1988, Brown and Wolfe 1994, Saladin et. al. 1995, Breslau et. al. 1997, Ouimette et. al. 1999, Najavits 1998
Why the Difficulties and Poorer Outcomes? A double dose of distress
Similar Neurobiologic Abnormalities in SUD & PTSD • Deficits in titrating level of arousal • Disease exacerbation with stress • SUD relapse • PTSD increase in intrusions and arousal sx • Cue-induced behavioral symptoms • Over-values and generalizes dangers of PTSD triggers • Under-values and fails to generalize dangers of SUD cues
Common Therapist Barriers in Forming an Alliance with SUD/PTSD Patients • Therapist’s resonance and sympathy with the patient’s state of heightened anxiety and distress leads to fearful treatment thoughts: • Fear of SUD relapse if PTSD is addressed • Fear of losing the alliance for PTSD work if SUD is addressed. • Tuned-out style of patient’s interactions • Difficult for therapist to engage in alliance
Therapist Suggestions forWorking with SUD/PTSD Patients • Non-confrontational & Respectful style • ‘Parental stance,’ extensive processing of Counter-transference • Strongly expressed empathy • Flexible approach allowing patients to process multiple traumatic events at a slower, ‘stop & go’ pace • Knowledge of PTSD and SUD treatment approaches • An explicit, extensive written set of safety parameters for • Impulsive behaviors, and • Relapse-prevention during PTSD treatment • Know methods to overcome non-functional resistance to exposure work. • Back et.al (2001) and Najavitiset.al (2008)
Common Therapist Barriers in Forming an Alliance with SUD/PTSD Patients • Dichotomous Thinking in Therapist • Sympathetic victim schema: PTSD is a disorder from an accident • Unsympathetic/Repulsive schema: SUD is a disorder of (bad) choices • Dichotomous / Non-Integrated Training of Clinicians • SUD and PTSD seem to exist in different universes • “I don’t know nothin’ about birthin’ no babies PTSD interventions.” • No empirical support for an integrated training model (Brady et al., 2001). • Clinical treatment programs operate under separate funding for general psychiatry and substance use disorders.
Reluctance by PTSD Patients and Therapists to Initiate SUD Treatment • Psychosocial and public nature of SUD work. • Confrontation of addictive behaviors by some treatment programs • Increases arousal (and hostility) • 12 Step Challenges to a Military Mind • Loss of Control: AA’s core tenet that life has become unmanageable from Alcohol and that they have ‘lost control’ • Surrender: Concept of a ‘Higher Power’ and ‘Surrender’ • Forgiveness: Fearless moral inventory and making amends • Anonymous Group: AA’s crowd of strangers and the telling of ‘war’ stories
Evidence for Benefit of PTSD Treatment for SUD Patients • Following Inpatient SUD treatment, the amount of PTSD outpatient treatment (3 months or longer) was a major predictor of sustained SUD remission. • Ouimette, Moos, Finney 2000 • Following Inpatient SUD treatment, partial hospital PTSD Combat trauma processing group showed sustained improvement in PTSD and SUD measures. • Donovan 2001
Psychopharmacology for SUD/PTSD • PTSD Evidence-based medication treatments • Sertraline • Paroxetine • Fluoxetine • PTSD Medication trials with ‘few data’: • Prazosin • Citalopram • Fluvoxamine • Escitalopram • Davidson 2005
Psychopharmacology for SUD/PTSD • PTSD Medications with ‘some data’: • Venlafaxine • Mirtazapine • Risperidone • Ineffective PTSD Medication: • Bupropion • Davidson 2005
General Rules for Med Trials • For PTSD patients: • Go low and slow to minimize anxiety side-effects • For SSRIs 2-12 weeks for 50% reduction in symptoms • Improvement continues up to 6 months for a 70% reduction • Davidson 2005 • For SUD/PTSD patients: • Same as above • Sometimes for agitation & sleep – go Fast and Heavy • Topamax ? • Less use of Quetiapine