1 / 62

2012 PE Review: Soil & Water Fundamentals

2012 PE Review: Soil & Water Fundamentals. Michael C. Hirschi , PhD, PE, D.WRE Senior Engineer Waterborne Environmental, Inc. hirschim@waterborne-env.com also Professor Emeritus University of Illinois . Acknowledgements: Rod Huffman, past PE Review coordinator

nikkos
Download Presentation

2012 PE Review: Soil & Water Fundamentals

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2012 PE Review: Soil & Water Fundamentals Michael C. Hirschi, PhD, PE, D.WRE Senior Engineer Waterborne Environmental, Inc. hirschim@waterborne-env.com also Professor Emeritus University of Illinois

  2. Acknowledgements: Rod Huffman, past PE Review coordinator Daniel Yoder (2006 presenter of parts) Rabi Mohtar & Majdi Abu Najm (2010 presenters of parts)

  3. Topics • Core principles – Fluids • Soil-Water Basics • Soil Erosion Principles • Water Quality Principles

  4. Sources • Environmental Soil Physics; Hillel; 1998 Hi • Soil and Water Conservation Engineering • 4th ed. Schwab, Fangmeier, Elliott, Frevert: S4 • 5th ed. Fangmeier, Elliott, Workman, Huffman, Schwab: S5 • Design Hydrology & Sedimentology for Small Catchments; Haan, Barfield, Hayes: H

  5. Fluids Review - Assumptions • Water in its liquid state • Low dissolved contaminants • Low suspended contaminants • Such that ρ (density) = 1.0 kg/L • Incompressible • Mass is conserved

  6. Basic nomenclature • Density is denoted as ρ, with units of mass/volume (kg/L, g/mL, slugs/ft3, etc.) • Flow rate is usually denoted as Q, with units of volume/time (cfs or ft3/sec, cms or m3/sec, gallons/min, L/min, etc.) • Velocity is denoted as V, with units of length/time (ft/sec, m/sec, etc.) • Area of flow is denoted as A, with units of length2 (ft2, m2, etc.)

  7. Flow rate The basic relationship between flow rate and velocity is then: Q = V * A which is a statement of conservation of mass. In addition, energy is neither created or destroyed, so an energy balance relationship also holds…

  8. The energy balance equation is Bernoulli’s equation: h = elevation of point 1 or 2 (m or ft) P1 = pressure (Pa or psi) at point 1 = specific weight of fluid v = velocity of fluid (at 1 or 2, according to subscript) W is energy added by a device (such as a pump) F is energy used to overcome friction

  9. Energy input from device Considering energy: Energy output to heat (friction) Energy stored as Pressure Kinetic Energy Potential Energy

  10. Example use of energy balance… • Need to size pump for irrigating gardens at lot 90 feet above Smith Mountain Lake in Virginia… • Location 1 is the lake, location 2 is a tank near the garden. • So, h1 = 0; h2 = 90ft; v1 = 0, v2 depends upon flow rate; P1 = 0; P2 is also 0 because the pipe exits to the atmosphere above the tank; F depends upon size of pipe and fittings (that’s another webinar), assume F = 20 feet. • The owner wants his 500 gallon tank to fill in 2 hours through the 0.75 inch pipe he installed.

  11. How much energy must the pump add? W = h2-h1 + 1/γ*(P2-P1)+ 1/2g*(v22-v12)+F P2 = P1, Q=500gal/120min/60s/min/7.48gal/ft3 =0.0093cfs; A= (0.75)2*3.14/4/144 = 0.003 ft2, so v2 = 3.1fps W=90-0 + 1/γ*(0-0)+1/2/32.2*(3.1)2 + 20 So W = 90+0.15+20 = 110 feet of head

  12. Pump specification • So, when the owner goes shopping, he needs to look for a pump that will deliver at least 4.2 gpm (500 gallons in 120 minutes) against 110 feet of water head. Translating head to pressure, there are 2.31 feet of head per psi, so the pump needs to generate 48psi at the pump housing while delivering 4.2 gpm. So, a pump that delivers 5gpm at 50psi would be fine.

  13. Questions on fluids basics?

  14. Soil-water basics • Soil classes and particle size distributions • Soil water • Content • Potential • Flow

  15. Basics – Soil Make Up • Mineral • Water • Air • Organic Matter

  16. Mineral Component - Particles • Sand • Silt • Clay • Aggregates • Silt & Sand sizes • Less dense than primary particles

  17. Particle Size Classifications

  18. USDA Texture Triangle

  19. Example After soil sample dispersal to ensure only primary particles are measured, a sample is determined to be 20% clay, 30% silt and 50% sand. What is the USDA soil texture? A: Sandy Clay Loam B: Sandy Loam C: Loam D: Clay Loam

  20. Solution Answer: C, Loam 30% Silt 20% Clay

  21. Infiltration & soil-water • Infiltration is the passage of water through the soil-air interface into pores within the soil matrix • Movement once infiltrated can be capillary flow or macropore flow. The latter is a direct connection from the soil surface to lower portions of the soil profile because of root holes, worm burrows, or other continuous opening • Infiltrated water can reappear as surface runoff via “interflow” and subsurface drainage

  22. Soil, water, air The inter-particle space (voids) is filled with either water or air. The amount of voids depends upon the soil texture and the condition (ie. tilled, compacted, etc.).

  23. Water (moisture) content • Special terms reflect the fraction of voids filled with water (all vary by texture and condition): • Saturation: All voids are filled with water • Field Saturation: Natural “saturated” moisture content which is lower than full saturation due to air that is trapped. • Field capacity: Water that can leave pores by gravity has done so (0.1 to 0.33 bars) • Wilting point: Water that is extractable by plant roots is gone (15 bars) • Hygroscopic point: Water that can be removed by all usual means is gone (but some remains, 30 bars)

  24. Saturated (all pores filled) Field Capacity (Some air, some water) Wilting point (water too tightly held for plant use)

  25. Plant Available Water

  26. Soil Water Holding Capacity(inches-water/foot-soil)

  27. Water States by Soil Texture Gravitational Plant Available Unavailable

  28. Commentary • In a later webinar, when we discuss drainage, it is the gravitational water that is of interest, eg. saturation down to field capacity. The volume of this water, the hydraulic characteristics of the soil in question, and the wet-condition-tolerance and value of the crop being grown dictate the drainage system design and its feasibility. • When we consider irrigation, plant available water (AW) is that held between field capacity and wilting point. It is this water that we manage via irrigation to supply water to plants. The volume of AW the soil can hold within the crop root-zone, the crop value and water use, and the crop tolerance of dry conditions dictate irrigation design and feasibility.

  29. Moisture “release” curve -10000cm -1000cm -100cm -10cm

  30. Any questions on general soil and water basics?

  31. Soil Erosion Principles • Soil erosion is a multi-step process: • Soil particle/aggregate detachment • Soil particle/aggregate transport • Soil particle/aggregate deposition • There must be detachment and transport for erosion to occur • Deposition (sedimentation) will occur somewhere downstream

  32. A little soils refresher… • Soil primary particles: • Sand, 0.05mm to 2mm, 2.65 g/cc density • Silt, 0.002mm to 0.05mm, 2.65 g/cc • Clay, <0.002mm, 2.6 g/cc • Soil aggregates, chemically/electrically bonded sets of primary particles: • Large, in the sand range, 1.6 g/cc • Small, in the large silt range, 1.8 g/cc • These aggregate sizes are approximately those used in the CREAMS model (USDA-ARS)

  33. Detachment • There are many sources of force and energy required to detach soil particles & aggregates: • Raindrop impact • Shallow surface flow shear • Concentrated flow shear • Many more, at larger scales

  34. Transportation • Many of the same processes contribute force and energy for soil particle & aggregate transport: • Raindrop impact • Shallow surface flow • Concentrated surface flow • Channelized flow • Others

  35. Balancing act • Foster & Meyer (1972) proposed a balance between detachment and transport for flowing water: • 1 = (transport load/transport capacity) + (detachment load/detachment capacity)

  36. Essentially, if the flow is using all its transport capacity transporting sediment, there’s nothing left to detach more. Likewise, if the flow is detaching new sediment at detachment capacity, there’s no capacity to transport any sediment. Natural systems balance out…

  37. Example • In the 80’s and 90’s there was a successful push to conservation tillage as a method to reduce sediment in lakes and streams • In many situations, no improvement was seen, but streambank erosion became more of a problem than it was in the past • I contend that now that the streams are receiving cleaner water (because of less upland erosion), but at similar rates, from farm fields, the stream uses less of its erosive energy to transport load it receives from runoff water, so it has capacity to undercut banks and scour the streambed

  38. Multi-stage erosion

  39. Sediment transport • Settling (H.204-209) • Stokes’ Law • Vs = settling velocity • d = particle diameter • g = accel due to gravity • SG = particle specific gravity • ν = kinematic viscosity • Simplified Stokes’ Law • SG = 2.65 • Quiescent water at 68oF • d in mm, Vs in fps

  40. Example: Settling Velocities • Given: • ISSS soil particle size classification • Find: • Settling velocities of largest sand, silt, and clay particles

  41. ISSS classification • Largest particles size • Clay = 0.002mm • Silt = 0.2mm • Sand = 2mm • Vs,clay = 1.12*10-4 fps = 0.04 ft/hr = 0.97 ft/day • Vs,silt = 0.11 fps = 405 ft/hr = 1.83 mi/day • Vs,sand = 11.24 fps = 7.66 mph = 184 mi/day

  42. Another example… • Given: • Stokes’ Law settling • Find: particles larger than what size can be assumed to settle 1 ft in one hour?

  43. Vs = [(1 ft)/(1 hr)](1 hr/3600s) = 2.778*10-4 fps • d = (Vs/2.81)1/2 = 0.00994mm (in the silt range)

  44. Application of process knowledge to control • Limit individual parts to limit whole • Limit detachment • Limit transport • Enhance deposition strategically • Where damage is minimal • Where cleanup is possible

  45. Control of Soil Erosion by Water • Detachment limiting strategies • Reduce raindrop impact • Reduce runoff • Reduce detachment capacity of runoff • Increase soil resistance to erosive forces • Transport limiting strategies • Reduce runoff volume • Reduce runoff transport capacity

  46. Example – No-Till • Detachment • Raindrop impact detachment is very low due to high surface cover percentage • Flow shear detachment is low due to low velocities caused by tortuous flow path • Soil is resistant to erosion because of low disturbance • Transport • Raindrop transport is limited by surface residue • Flow transport is limited by increased infiltration, lessening runoff • Flow transport is further limited by small dams created by surface residue

  47. Example – Mulch on newly seeded area • Detachment • Raindrop impact detachment is very low due to high surface cover percentage • Flow shear detachment is low due to low velocities caused by tortuous flow path • Transport • Raindrop transport is limited by surface residue • Flow transport is limited by increased infiltration, lessening runoff • Flow transport is further limited by small dams created by surface residue

  48. Comparison of no-till vs. mulch • Detachment • Likely higher with mulch for same surface cover fraction because of higher soil disturbance for seedbed preparation • Likely higher for no-till following dry years because amount of residue cover is dictated by prior year crop growth • Transport • Likely higher for mulch, unless “cut” in because no-till residue is effectively “cut” in during planting, at least for a small area, hopefully across slope • Likely higher for mulch situation because seedbed prep likely reduced average aggregate diameter

  49. Control of Sediment in Runoff • Reduce transport capacity of flow • Enhance deposition of sediment

More Related