1 / 14

Overview of 6 km Damping Ring Study

Overview of 6 km Damping Ring Study. Kwang-Je Kim for ANL-FNAL-UIUC Collaboration ILC-Americas Work Shop SLAC, Stanford, CA October 14-16, 2004. 6-km Damping Ring Study. The 17-km Tesla dog-bone design assumed 20 ns rise- & fall-time kickers.

nili
Download Presentation

Overview of 6 km Damping Ring Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overview of 6 km Damping Ring Study Kwang-Je Kim for ANL-FNAL-UIUC Collaboration ILC-Americas Work Shop SLAC, Stanford, CA October 14-16, 2004

  2. 6-km Damping Ring Study • The 17-km Tesla dog-bone design assumed 20 ns rise- & fall-time kickers. • If kickers with shorter rise & longer fall time are available, damping rings can be “small” using a injection scheme by Joe Rogers. • Fast kickers were discussed by Frisch and Gollin. • This is an overview of work on a 6-km small damping ring by ANL-FNAL-UIUC collaboration and J. Rogers & A. Wolski. • Content: • Current status: linear lattice, instability estimates, & alignment sensitivities • Plan for a next level study using tools developed for higher brightness light sources

  3. APS, a 1 km, 7 GeV Ring at Work

  4. Damping Ring Lattice Development Initial work started at Fermilab (Amin Xiao’s talk) • A 6-km, 5 GeV ring with TME lattice using the procedure discussed in P. Emma and T. Raubenheimer, PRSTAB,4, 021001 (2001) • 77 m of wigglers compared to 400 m in TESLA. • Higher current in smaller ring than TESLA. • Performance similar to the TESLA design.

  5. Major Parameters of DRs and APS

  6. Instability Estimates (Bill Ng) • Incoherent space charge tune shift=0.026 << 0.31 for TESLA • Smaller circumference, larger beam size (larger disp.) • Instabilities • Longitudinal: Single- & multi-bunch thresholds;safe • Transverse: Single bunch threshold; safe multi-bunch threshold; safe with damper • Electron cloud: Growth time about 1s with solenoids • Fast ion: Growth less than 20% with feedback (@ 10-10)

  7. Quadrupole and Sextupole Alignment Sensitivities (A. Wolski) • 6-km DR less sensitive than Tesla dogbone • Both 6-km DR and Tesla dogbone more sensitive than ATF

  8. The “Small” DR Looks Doable. Next Step? • Further optimization of parameters • Energy (3.7GeV), lattice, • Next-level study with tools and technology developed for high-brightness light sources: • Impedance modelling and minimization • Beam monitoring and feedback • Wiggler development • Photon absorbers

  9. Tools for Nonlinear Beam Dynamics(Louis Emery’s Talk) • Toolkit approach combined with comprehensive tracking code elegant developed by M. Borland • Parallel simplex optimizer being developed by H. Shang • An example of future investigation • Trade-off in non-linearities between weaker focusing arc cell design and longer wiggler to maximize dynamic aperture

  10. RF BPM Diagnostics & Feedback • Orbit motion is characterized by a PSD spectrum in range 0 to frev/2 • RMS orbit jitter at extraction is equal the integral of PSD spectrum • Orbit feedback reduces beam motion only in a certain band, say, 0-60 Hz (APS) -> Orbit jitter is reduced somewhat depending on the PSD details • For damping ring, higher-bandwidth feedback may be needed to reduce jitter sufficiently

  11. Vacuum Chamber Issues • Minimizing Impedances: • Make use “impedance database” obtained by modeling and measuring local impedance (e.g., by orbit response matrix) • Suppress electron cloud effects: • Employ solenoids, slots, low-secondary-yield-coefficient coatings, and/or corrugation • Based on experimental and modelling experiences at APS (K. Harkay, R. Rosenberg, L. Loiacono)

  12. Wiggler Development • Radiation damage of PM undulator( M. Petra) • Superconducting wiggler (S.H. Kim); Useful for damping wiggler? • The LCLS undulator under construction at APS is similar to that used for positron production scheme.

  13. Photon Absorbers • APS dipole fan and undulator photon beam absorbers sustain high intensities ( S. Sharma) • Upto 600 mA for dipole fan, 300mA for undulator • Damping ring absorbers can be scaled from APS designs

  14. Summary • With the development of fast kickers “small” damping rings are a serious option for ILC. • Preliminary study of a 6 km, 5 Gev DR look promising. • Further optimization and next level study are planned using tools for light source improvement. More information: • Studies Pertaining to a Small Damping Ring for the International Linear Collider,FERMILAB-TM-2272-AD-TD • ILC Damping Rings web site: http://awolski.lbl.gov/ILCDR/

More Related