1 / 23

Proposed 21st Century Governance Model: Challenges, Goals, and Solutions

The National Vice President, Chair, and other committee members present a proposed governance model for the future, addressing challenges, setting goals, and outlining solutions. They seek approval from the Board of Directors and encourage questions and feedback.

ninar
Download Presentation

Proposed 21st Century Governance Model: Challenges, Goals, and Solutions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Proposed 21st Century Model Presented By: David Reilly John Vargo Governance Model for the Future

  2. Agenda Committee Members Define Challenge Compare Governance Models Moving Forward

  3. Comments/Questions

  4. Comments/Questions(Continued)

  5. Comments/Questions(Continued)

  6. Comments/Questions(Continued)

  7. Committee Members David Reilly, National Vice President and Chair Lisa Gallinat, National Treasurer Ryan Spiegel, National Judge Advocate John Vargo, Region President’s Working Group Chair Jim Lasher, Co-Chair Bylaws Committee Bruce Bishop, PHD, Parliamentarian and Advisor Veda Frye, Staff Administrative Representative

  8. Current Governance Model ChallengesNational Directors in Attendance

  9. Challenges Continued National Director Vacant Positions with no Nominee: 2015 – 28 (13%) 2016 – 28 (13%) 2017 – 36 (17%)

  10. How Do We Overcome the Challenges? Create a new Governance Model Develop process to elect delegates instead of National Directors from the 17 regions Develop process to appoint Region Presidents to Navy League Board Change bylaws to institutionalize changes to Governance Model Develop a National President succession plan that provides better on-the-job training for the incoming president

  11. Goals Create 21st century leadership model that illustrates the Navy League’s advocacy mission and enhances mission success Ensure continued connectivity with the regions and councils Create a better defined line of succession that enhances the continuity and effectiveness of future volunteer leaders

  12. Goals (Continued) Better define the roles of the National Vice Presidents, giving responsibility and authority for the broader strategic direction and success of the NLUS Improve participation of National Officers (NVP, NCS, NT, NJA, & RP) in Governance of the NLUS Enhance the involvement of regions and councils in Governance of the NLUS at the national level

  13. Other Organizations BOD Size

  14. Current / Proposed Steering Committee

  15. Current Vs. Proposed Board of Directors

  16. Current vs. Proposed Delegates Current: • National Directors Proposed: • National Delegates elected by Regions. • Useprocess similar to Operations Manual for National Directors in current model. • National Delegates to be seated by members at annual meeting. • National Delegates duties compared to National Director’s duties in subsequent slide.

  17. Succession to National President (current) National President-Elect Does not function as a true President-Elect Must stand for election to National President (NP) at annual convention where the NP term ends Incumbent NP calls Fall BOD meeting to elect a National President-Elect

  18. National President-Elect Proposed Solution Rename NP-E to SVP (former name, changed in 2003) Elected to one-year term at annual convention Benefits: National Delegates only need to attend 1 meeting annually Removes confusion regarding accession to NP Should provide for better qualified NP candidates May have 2 SVP candidates seeking to become National President Other qualified candidates can also be considered by NATNOMCOM

  19. Delegates How will we elect National Delegates? Nominated to REGNOMCOM by councils and region members through their councils Approved by Region President Seated by members at Annual Meeting

  20. How do duties compare? Delegates vs. NDs • Bylaws will generally be approved by the BOD but some bylaws related to mission, cost • of membership or distribution of funds to councils will be identified for delegate approval.

  21. Region President on BOD (8 total)(2 per Greater Region, which includes RPWG Chairman) EASTERN REGIONS Greater Region “C” – Southern Regions • Caribbean • Florida • Southern • South Atlantic Total membership – 12,135 Greater Region “D” – Northeastern Regions • Mid Atlantic • Liberty • Empire • New England • European Total membership – 11,255 WESTERN REGIONS Greater Region “A” - Western Regions • Northwest • Pacific • Pacific Central • Pacific Southwest Total membership – 15,075 Greater Region “B” - Central Regions • Rocky Mountain • Mid West • Lone Star • Great Lakes Total membership – 8,065

  22. What’s Next? Recommend Board of Directors approve the Governance Model Concept. NP to task the Bylaws Committee to develop proposed Bylaws changes that will reflect and implement the new Governance Model for presentation and approval at the Fall BOD meeting.

  23. Questions?

More Related