1 / 14

Facing America’s Long-Term Budget Challenges

Facing America’s Long-Term Budget Challenges. Brian Riedl Grover M. Hermann Fellow for Federal Budgetary Affairs The Heritage Foundation. Washington is Spending Nearly $30,000 Per Household in 2010. Above-Average Spending – not Falling Revenues –is Driving Long-Term Deficits Upward.

nirav
Download Presentation

Facing America’s Long-Term Budget Challenges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Facing America’s Long-Term Budget Challenges Brian Riedl Grover M. Hermann Fellow for Federal Budgetary Affairs The Heritage Foundation

  2. Washington is Spending Nearly $30,000 Per Household in 2010

  3. Above-Average Spending – not Falling Revenues –is Driving Long-Term Deficits Upward

  4. Composition of Federal Spending: 1962-2020

  5. The Long-Term Challenge • 77 million baby boomers will retire between 2008 and 2029. • Ratio of workers supporting each retiree: • 1960 – 5-to-1 • 2010 – 3-to-1 • 2030 – 2-to-1 • By 2030, a married couple will have to support themselves, their children – and their very own retiree. • In addition to demographics, Medicare also must deal with rising health care costs. • Senior health care will also push up Medicaid costs.

  6. Social Security, Medicare, & Medicaid Costs As a Percent of GDP

  7. Option 1: Tax IncreasesPer Household & Translated Into Today’s GDP

  8. Option 1: Implications • Would have to raise taxes every year until they were 10.2% of GDP higher than today. • In today’s economy, a 10.2% of GDP tax increase would average $12,072 per household. • Marginal tax rates would likely more than double. • Combined federal, state, and local taxes would reach European levels. • Generally, these high tax rates have been shown to reduce economic growth, depress incomes, and increase unemployment.

  9. Option 2: Other Program CutsYearly Budget Breakdown, Assuming No Tax Hikes or Budget Deficits

  10. Option 2: Implications • Would have to immediately begin terminating programs to make room for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and interest on past debt. • By 2030, defense would be the only other remaining program. • By 2049, defense would have to be eliminated too. • By that point, 100% of the budget would go towards Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and interest on past debt. • Clearly, this is not realistic.

  11. Option 3: Continue Current PoliciesAnd Cover Shortfalls With Budget Deficits

  12. Option 3: Implications • Hold all taxes and other spending constant as a percent of GDP, and then cover shortfalls with budget deficits. • Borrowing 10.2% more of GDP per year ($1.4 trillion more in today’s economy) would raise the federal debt to levels never seen before. • Such debt could increase interest rates, which would in turn trigger an exponential increase in federal debt and net interest costs. • Such large expenses could create an economic crisis.

  13. Option 4: Modernize Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid • Reform is the only way to avoid the scenarios listed above. • Delays only push up the final reform costs. • Hold harmless those under age 50? Four million baby boomers cross this threshold annually. All will have by 2014. • Some pain now, or more pain later.

  14. Conclusion • This issue is about more than economics. It is about the future we want. • There is a moral question of whether one generation should hand a multi-trillion dollar retirement bill over to the next generation. • In the absence of fundamental reform, those entering the workforce today will experience both higher lifetime tax rates and lower incomes than their parents as a result of these retirement costs.

More Related