140 likes | 386 Views
UNDAP Tanzania 2011-15. An Overview of the UN/GoT Programme of Cooperation. UNDAP: The Rationale.
E N D
UNDAP Tanzania 2011-15 An Overview of the UN/GoT Programme of Cooperation
UNDAP: The Rationale • Improve the coherence, development effectiveness and efficiency of its operations in Tanzania; improve the transparency of the UN’s work in Tanzania and thereby enhancing its accountability to the Government and Development Partners. • The UN in Tanzania’s experience in developing and using the previous and current UNDAFsto guide the UN’s work. Key constraints included: lack of prioritisation, broadly defined similar outcomes which were overly ambitious for the timeframe, lack of specificity about what the UN would contribute, and lack of monitoring and evaluation. • The UNCMT’s decision to develop a single UN country plan for Tanzania; moving from a strategic framework (UNDAF) to a single country programme. • The UN resolution A/RES/64/289 on system wide coherence allowed for submission and approval of common country programmes on a voluntary basis
UNDAP: What is different? CPD CPAPs CCA Prioritisation UNDAF Standard process Specialised Agency Country Plans MKUKUTA/ MKUZA Review UNDAP process Prioritisation UNDAP Common CPD Specialised Agency Country Plans
UNDAP: Results and Accountability Collective Accountability Member states GoT and Development Partners UN and Implementing Partners Agency(s) and Implementing Partners Individual agency
UNDAP: Prioritising Capacity Development Capacity of Who? (Of Outcomes) Capacity to do What? (Of Outputs)
UNDAP: Budgetary Framework UNDAP Budget Outlay: $ 773m (inclusive of programme costs
UNDAP: Resource Mobilisation Plan • (mill USD)
UNDAP: Areas of cooperation Fulfilment of human rights in Tanzania Supporting Basic Social Services Reducing income poverty Providing Durable solutions Basic services and protection for refugees National Development Outcomes Cluster II: Improvement of Quality of Life and Social Well-being (Budget: $ 323m, 42%) Cluster I: Growth for reduction of income poverty (Budget: $ 180 million, 23%) SME capacity and entrepreneurial skills Health, Nutrition and HIV / AIDS Education, Vocational Training, School feeding Agriculture productivity & food security Sectoral capacities Environmental mainstreaming & climate change adaptation Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Protection services, Social Protection Trade promotion and Labour standards Advancing good governance, national oversight and accountability Strengthening development management capacity Justice system responsive to children & women Deepening democracy and further community dialogue Strengthening National emergency preparedness and response Enabling Environment Advance fulfillment of Tanzania’s international treaty obligations Cluster III: Governance and Accountability (Budget: $ 270 m , 35%)
UNDAP Management Structure Cluster I Cluster II JSC: Joint Steering Committee CMT: Country Management Team SMT: Security Management Team OMT: Operations Management Team IAPC: Inter-Agency Programme Committee Com’G: Communications Group ECG: Emergency Coordination Group IAGG: Inter-Agency Gender Group HRG: Human Rights Group PME Group: Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation Group PWG: Programme Working Group Znz CG: Zanzibar Coordination Group Znz CG Cluster III
Proposed planning, monitoring & reporting Country Programme Planning UNDAP WG Annual Workplans Economic Growth Environ-ment Education Health HIV/AIDS Annual Work Planning Social Protection WASH Governance Emergencies Refugees UN will sign 10 AWPs with GoT Mid Year / Annual Reviews Common Review process One UN report Annual report Agency reporting as necessary
UNDAP: Results and Accountability Collective Accountability Member states GoT and Development Partners UN and Implementing Partners Agency(s) and Implementing Partners Individual agency
UNDAP: the Process • Cross Cutting Considerations • Human Rights • Gender Equality • Environmental Sustainability • Capacity Development • RBM • Stakeholder Participation • Government of Tanzania • UN Agencies • Civil Society • Development Partners
UNDAP: Prioritising Capacity Development How will the UN build this capacity? (Of Key Actions) COMMUNICATION CONVENER (Strengthening Inclusive Decision-Making) FUNCTIONAL CAPACITIES
UNDAP: the Process • UNDAP is results-based and mainstreams UN programming principles and cross-cutting issues: • UN priorities were identified using a Human Rights Based Approach to Programming (HRBA) • Gender equality was mainstreamed in prioritization and programming phases, supported with Quality Assurance mechanisms • Capacity Development was an important consideration in the formulation of Outcomes and deciding on the choice of interventions • Specific outcomes relating Environmental Sustainability are planned in UNDAP, and have been mainstreamed as cross-cutting considerations with planned key actions • Cross-cutting issues on HIV/AIDS, Conflict prevention, Disaster risk reduction (DRR), Food security, Indigenous peoples’ issues, Volunteerism and Employment & decent work have also been considered in light of planned key actions More than 300 persons participated in the development of UNDAP NSAs include CSOs, FBOs, INGOs, Private Sector and DPs.