210 likes | 288 Views
Lecture 21 Don DeVoretz. Industrialization: A Strategy for Development ?. Debate 1 Multinationals. Pros and Cons of Multi-nationals The argued benefits from Multi-national Corporations operating in your country are:
E N D
Lecture 21Don DeVoretz Industrialization: A Strategy for Development ?
Debate 1 Multinationals • Pros and Cons of Multi-nationals • The argued benefits from Multi-national Corporations operating in your country are: • fill savings gaps, provide foreign exchange, government revenue, management skills and • technology which all will lead to further growth.
Debate 1 con’t • The counter arguments are that; • capital is raised locally, • little profits are reinvested, and tax avoiding transfers • Which point of view appears appropriate for your country? • What is the evidence to support above? • How would you gain the required evidence to support one view or the other?
Debate 2 Infant Industry • Korea used both the Infant Industry technique and then followed it by an outward looking export-oriented strategy. Korea was successful because it could enjoy at first the gains from import protection before switching to an export strategy because it was a political ally of the west. • Jamaica, which followed a similar strategy, failed because they did not get favored treatment by developed countries since it had a socialist government.
Debate 2 Infant Industry • Which view do you agree with? • What are the essential ingredients in the infant industry argument to insure that gains are available in short-run ? • What policies must be in place to insure an export oriented policy both at home and in the developed countries ?
Industrialization as a Pathway • A. History: • U.K. Industrialization lead to economic development • 1. But was this the entire story ? • No, Enclosures and Corn laws • 2. Industry was a leading sector: • Textile exports, steel etc. and caused backward and forward linkages.
Modern Evidence • 1.Share of industrial value added in GNP to Yp • 2. Evidence for large countries: 4x Yp raises industrial share by 20% • 3. Only 1/2 of variation in valued added share of industry explained by level of Yp • 4. Variations around sc line explained y • i. Import substitution • ii. Resource endowment
Industrialization and Employment • 1. Elasticity value = % industry employment / % industry value added = .6 • or a 10% increase in Yp leads to a 6% growth in employment. • 2. This implies that productivity rose by 4 % per annum or • trade off between higher wages but less industrial employment
D. Industrial Structure: • Backward Integration: • rise in final or consumer demand feeds • back to producer goods. • Turning point is $2,500 in Yp • Forward Linkage • Textiles to cloth: • .A necessary condition is that textiles must be produced below world cost: • Policy to achieve above is infant industry tariff.
Investment Choices and Industry: Choice of Technique • 1. Context • Workers in rich country paid 10X that of poor country. • . Capital costs in poor country twice of rich country. • . Textile is of equal quality in both countries. • 2. Three Technologies • defined by capital-labour ratios • .T1: capital/labour ratio = 80/22=3.6 • . T2=18.1 • .T3=400/5=80 • thus, T3 is 22 times more capital intensive than T1
Choice of Three Techniques • Tech 1 Tech 2 Tech 3 • A. Inputs (M $) • 1.Equip 80 200 400 • 2.labour 22 11 5 • 3. Other 11.4 9.3 6.7 • Which technique to choose and why ? • What is the effect on employment ?
Factor costs: Rich and Poor Countries • Rich Poor • 1. i rate .05 .10 • 2. wages/yr 15 1.5
PV of Cost of T1-T3 Rich • ($1,000) T1 T2 T3 • a. cap charge 80 200 400 • b. wages 4112 2056 935 • c. other costs 142 116 83 • d. Total Rich 4334 2372 1418 • T3 is the clear choice since it is relatively capital intensive or labour saving
PV of Cost of T1-T3 Poor • ($1,000) T1 T2 T3 • a. cap charge 80 200 400 • b. wages 280 140 64 • c. other costs 97 79 57 • d. Total Poor 457 419 521 • Poor Pick T2 However, if wages drop than T1
What are Scale Economies • 1. What are scale economies? • a. Scale economies are declining Lac curves. • b. Declining LAC arise due to • a. fixed costs; research, • b. spreading of capital, • c. greater scale implies greater specialization • d. quantity discounts • 2. What role do they play in an investment decision ? • Crucial to being competitive.
Second Criterion : Product Choice? • Want to experience large scale economices quickly ? Why? • Small Domestic markets ? • Concepts: MES • MES= minimum efficient scale • % increase in ac @1/2 MES • Tells you how steep your cost increase is on short run Average cost curve • MES as % of market
Product Choices: Why No Beer ? • %rise in LAC MESas % of market • 1. Bread 15% 1 % • 2. Beer 9 3 • 3. footwear 2 .2 • 4. dyes 22 100 • 5. sulfuric acid 1 30 • 6. polymers 5 33 • 7. cement 9 10 • 8. steel 8 80 • 9. machine tools 5 100 • 10. Electric motors 15 60 • 11. Autos 6 50 • 12. bicycles 1 10 • 13. diesel engines 4 10
Conclusions: • Beer and Bread: No major scale economies and too quickly realized. Thus, all countries are efficient. Can’t compete by scale • Steel and Machine tools, • Huge scale economies, • First there is efficient and tough for others to compete
Technical Choice and Scale • Favour Developed Countries: • Capital Intensive have large scale economies and thus low capital costs keep developed countries continually out front when new techniques emerge for same products. Steel in Canada.