1 / 39

Money, Banking & Finance Lecture 3

Money, Banking & Finance Lecture 3. Risk, Return and Portfolio Theory. Aims. Explain the principles of portfolio diversification Demonstrate the construction of the efficient frontier Show the trade-off between risk and return Derive the Capital Market Line (CML)

nita
Download Presentation

Money, Banking & Finance Lecture 3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Money, Banking & FinanceLecture 3 Risk, Return and Portfolio Theory

  2. Aims • Explain the principles of portfolio diversification • Demonstrate the construction of the efficient frontier • Show the trade-off between risk and return • Derive the Capital Market Line (CML) • Show the calculation of the optimal portfolio choice based on the mean and variance of portfolio returns.

  3. Overview • Investors choose a set of risky assets (stocks) plus a risk-free asset. • The risk-free asset is a term deposit or government Treasury bill. • Investors can borrow or lend as much as they like at the risk-free rate of interest. • Investors like return but dislike risk (risk averse).

  4. Preferences of Expected return and risk • We have seen how expected return is defined in Lecture 2. • The investor faces a number of stocks with different expected returns and differ from each other in terms of risk. • The expected return on the portfolio is the weighted mean return of all stocks. First moment. • Risk is measured in terms of the variance of returns or standard deviation. Second moment. • Investor preferences are in terms of the first and second moments of the distribution of returns.

  5. Investor Utility function

  6. E(Rp) Expected return U2 U0 σp Risk Preference Function

  7. Expected return

  8. Risk

  9. Return and risk • How do return and risk vary relative to each other as the investor alters the proportion of each of the assets in the portfolio? • Assume that returns, risk and the covariance are fixed and simply vary the weights in the portfolio. • Let E(R1)=8.75% and E(R2)=21.25 • Let w1=0.75 and w2=0.25 • E(Rp)=.75x8.75+.25x21.25=11.88 • σ1=10.83, σ2=19.80, ρ1,2=-.9549

  10. Portfolio Risk • σ2p=(0.75)2x(10.83)2+(0.25)2x(19.80)2+2x(0.75)x(0.25)x(-0.95)x(10.83)x(19.80) • =13.7 • σp=√13.7=3.7 • Calculate risk and return for different weights

  11. Portfolio risk and return

  12. Locus of risk-return points Expected return (0,1) (.5,.5) (.75,.25) (1,0) Risk=standard deviation

  13. Risk – return locus • Can see that the locus of risk and returns vary according to the proportions of the equity held in the portfolio. • The proportion (0.75,0.25) is the lowest risk point with highest return. • The other points are either higher risk and higher return or low return and high risk. • The locus of points vary with the correlation coefficient and is called the efficient frontier

  14. Choice of weights • How does the portfolio manager choose the weights? • That will depend on preferences of the investor. • What happens if the number of assets grows to a large number. • If n is the number of assets then will need n(n-1)/2 covariances - becomes intractable • A short-cut is the Single Index Model (SIM) where each asset return is assumed to vary only with the return of the whole market (FTSE100, DJ, etc). • For ‘n’ assets the efficient frontier defines a ‘bundle’ of risky assets.

  15. ‘n’ asset case

  16. How is the efficient frontier derived? • The shape of the efficient frontier will depend on the correlation between the asset returns of the two assets. • If the correlation is ρ = +1 then the portfolio risk is the weighted average of the risk of the portfolio components. • If the correlation is ρ = -1 then the portfolio risk can be diversified away to zero • When ρ < +1 then not all the total risk of each investment is non-diversifiable. Some of it can be diversified away

  17. Correlation of +1

  18. Correlation of -1

  19. Check

  20. Correlation < +1

  21. Efficient frontier E(Rp) Ρ= -1 -1 < Ρ < +1 Ρ= +1 σp

  22. The general case – applied to two assets

  23. Efficient Frontier E(Rp) X Y σp

  24. Risk-free asset • Lets introduce a risk-free asset that pays a rate of interest Rf. • The rate Rfis known with certainty and has zero variance and therefore no covariance with the portfolio. • Such a rate could be a short-term government bill or commercial bank deposit.

  25. One bundle of risky assets • Take one bundle of risky assets and allow the investor to lend or borrow at the safe rate of interest. The investor can; • Invest all his wealth in the risky bundle and undertake no lending or borrowing. • Invest less than his total wealth in the single risky bundle and the rest in the risk-free asset. • Invest more than his total wealth in the risky bundle by borrowing at the risk-free rate and hold a levered portfolio. • These choices are shown by the transformation line that relates the return on the portfolio with one risk-free asset and risk.

  26. Transformation line

  27. Linear Opportunity set • Let the risk-free rate Rf= 10% and the return on the bundle of assets RN = 22.5%. • The standard deviation of the returns on the bundle σN = 24.87%. • The weights on the risky bundle and the risk-free asset can be varied to produce a range of new portfolio returns.

  28. Portfolio Risk and Return

  29. Transformation line • The transformation line describes the linear risk-return relationship for any portfolio consisting of a combination of investment in one safe asset and one ‘bundle’ of risky assets. • At every point on a given transformation line the investor holds the risky assets in the same fixed proportions of the risky portfolio ωi.

  30. Transformation line E(Rp) -0.5 borrowing + 1.5 in risky bundle 0.5 lending + 0.5 in risky bundle No lending all investment in bundle Rf All lending σp

  31. A riskless asset and a risky portfolio • An investor faces many bundles of risky assets (eg from the London Stock Exchange). • The efficient frontier defines the boundary of efficient portfolios. • The single risky asset is replaced by a risky portfolio. • We can find a dominant portfolio with the riskless asset that will be superior to all other combinations.

  32. Combining risk-free and risky portfolios E(Rp) C B A Rf σp

  33. Borrowing and Lending • The investor can lend or borrow at the risk-free rate of interest rate. • The risk-free rate of interest Rf represents the rate on Treasury Bills or some other risk-free asset. • The efficiency boundary is redefined to include borrowing.

  34. Borrowing and lending frontier C E(Rp) B Rf A σp

  35. Combined borrowing and lending at different rates of interest • The investor can borrow at the rate of interest Rb • Lend at the rate of interest Rf • The borrowing rate is greater than the risk-free rate. Rb > Rf • Preferences determine the proportions of lending or borrowing,

  36. Combining borrowing and lending D E(Rp) Q C B Rb P Rf A σp

  37. Separation Principle • Investor makes 2 separate decisions • Given knowledge of expected returns, variances and covariances the investor determines the efficient frontier. The point M is located with reference to Rf. • The investor determines the combination of the risky portfolio and the safe asset (lending) or a leveraged portfolio (borrowing).

  38. Market portfolio and risk reduction Portfolio risk Diversifiable risk Non-diversifiable risk Number of securities 20

  39. Summary • We have examine the theory of portfolio diversification • We have seen how the efficient frontier is constructed. • We have seen that portfolio diversification reduces risk to the non-diversifiable component.

More Related