1 / 12

Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Source :

nitesh
Download Presentation

Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Source: Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science 2009; 4:50. Note: Authors from the VA and University of Michigan, SPH, Department of Health Management and Policy

  2. CFIR Purpose • “An overarching typology to promote implementation theory development” • Builds on Greenhalgh et al.’s synthesis of 500 sources, plus newer articles • Combines Greenhalgh’s conceptual model with 18 new models • “Meta-theoretical” – a synthesis of existing theories, no depiction of inter-relationships, ecologic levels or hypotheses

  3. Five Domains • Intervention characteristics • Outer setting • Inner setting • Characteristics of the individuals involved • Process of implementation

  4. Characteristics of the Intervention Constructs Interesting Points Interventions typically a poor fit without adaptation Interventions have core components & adaptable periphery • Intervention source • Evidence strength & quality • Relative advantage • Adaptability • Trialability • Complexity • Design quality and packaging • Cost

  5. Outer Setting Constructs Interesting Points Includes economic, political and social context within which an organization resides Interface between inner and outer settings is dynamic Changes in the outer setting can influence implementation, often mediated through the inner setting • Patient needs and resources • Cosmopolitanism • Peer pressure • External policy & incentives

  6. Inner Setting Constructs Interesting Points Includes structural, political and cultural contexts through which the implementation process will proceed Line between inner and outer will depend on the project/study (e.g., role of outlying clinics or loosely affiliated medical center) • Structural characteristics • Networks & communication • Culture • Implementation climate • Readiness for implementation

  7. Characteristics of Individuals Constructs Interesting Points Individuals have agency-they make choices & wield power Little research on interplay between individuals and organizations Theory of Planned Behavior most often used to predict clinical behavior of health professionals • Knowledge & beliefs about the intervention • Self-efficacy • Individual stage of change • Individual identification with the organization • Other personal attributes

  8. Process of Implementation Constructs Interesting Points Implementation requires an active change process Process may be inter-related sub-processes: planned or spontaneous, linear or nonlinear • Planning • Engaging • Executing • Reflecting & evaluating

  9. Uses of CFIR • Opens the black box of Implementation in RE-AIM • Researchers should: • Assess each construct for salience, and adapt and operationalize definitions for each study • Discern levels at which each construct should be evaluated and defined (e.g., individuals, teams, units, clinics) • Decide how to measure and assess each • Consider best timing for measurement given dynamic process of implementation

  10. Uses of CFIR (cont.) • Formative stage: capacity and needs assessment to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation • Implementation stage: to track key implementation processes • Outcome and impact stage: to explore what factors influenced implementation and how implementation influenced intervention performance At macro level: to organize and synthesize findings across studies using common language and definitions

More Related