240 likes | 357 Views
Faculty Presentation. University of California, Berkeley Eta Kappa Nu, Mu Chapter. Monday, May 3, 2010. Presented by Eta Kappa Nu with the support of IEEE. The Survey. 345 responses from Undergraduates 82% EECS 18% LSCS 18.6% Freshmen 22.6% Sophomores 30.7% Juniors 24.9% Senior
E N D
Faculty Presentation University of California, BerkeleyEta Kappa Nu, Mu Chapter Monday, May 3, 2010 Presented by Eta Kappa Nu with the support of IEEE
The Survey • 345 responses from Undergraduates • 82% EECS • 18% LSCS • 18.6% Freshmen • 22.6% Sophomores • 30.7% Juniors • 24.9% Senior • 3.2% Super Senior
Overview • Faculty Advising • EECS Research • Lab-based Courses • Miscellaneous
Faculty Advising Are you satisfied with the current faculty advising system?
Faculty Advising • Student Comments + “Nice overview of planned schedules.” + “Faculty are very helpful in general.” - “Advisors should know more about relevant coursework.” - “Students have to have more choice on choosing their advisor.” - “I wish L&S CS had more 1-on-1 advising sessions.” - “Don't give too much help on courses--just come in and leave with your advising code.”
Faculty Advising Which form of faculty advising would you prefer?
Faculty Advising • Student Comments about form of advising I: “I often felt judged in the group setting and afraid to talk to the professor about my issues.” I: “Group advising in an hour doesn't allow people to build a rapport with [professors] and get detailed answers for their questions.” G: “Hearing about other people's schedules and experiences helps.” G: “[Group advising is] way less scary.”
Faculty Advising Would you be interested in the ability to choose a faculty member based on whether they do group or individual advising?
Faculty Advising • Primary suggestion Create a system by which undergraduates can select their faculty adviser based on advising method.
Overview • Faculty Advising • EECS Research • Lab-based Courses • Miscellaneous
EECS Research Have you participated in research? If you have not participated in research, why? 50.8% 47.2% 38.2% 10.6% 9.2%
EECS Research If you have participated in EECS department research, how did you become involved?
EECS Research • Primary suggestion • Publicize and support research opportunities more. Students seem interested, but haven’t figured out how to get their foot in the door. This semester HKN hosted several “How-To” workshops, we plan to offer more in the future to help address this problem.
Overview • Faculty Advising • EECS Research • Lab-based Courses • Miscellaneous
Lab-based Courses If you have taken a lab-based lower division EECS course, how would you compare it with a non-lab-based course? Which lab-based courses have you taken?
Lab-based Courses If you have taken a lab-based lower division EECS course, how would you compare it with a non-lab-based course?
Lab-based Courses • “Lets you get more hands-on…read about the concept, and then see code right away. • “Great idea. The labs themselves can be improved.” • “Really depends on the TA” • “61B is better suited for a lab-centric format than say 61C, in my opinion.”
Overview • Faculty Advising • EECS Research • Lab-based Courses • Miscellaneous
Misc: Physics 7B Do you think that Physics 7B should be removed as a prerequisite for EE40 (and left as a prerequisite for other courses such as EE130)?
Misc: Course Planning What resource(s) best help you plan your classes for future semesters?
Misc: Additional Comments • Infrastructural improvements (Airbears connectivity, more power strips in Soda, faster Unix machines) • Opportunities for creativity (open-endedness in course projects)
Questions? • Contact • HKN:hkn@hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu • IEEE: ieee-execs@lists.berkeley.edu
EECS Research If you have participated in EECS department research, how did you become involved?