110 likes | 271 Views
Doing A Literature Review Jeffrey Knopf. What is a literature review? A literature review summarizes and evaluates a body of writings about a specific topic. It should conclude how accurate and complete knowledge of that specific topic is. Three Contexts for Literature Reviews:
E N D
Doing A Literature Review Jeffrey Knopf What is a literature review? A literature review summarizes and evaluates a body of writings about a specific topic. It should conclude how accurate and complete knowledge of that specific topic is.
Three Contexts for Literature Reviews: • As an end in and of itself, to survey what knowledge is out there. • As a preliminary stage in a larger research project. • As a component of a finished research report.
Tips: • Plan to adjust your research topic based on what gaps, or debates, you find in the literature. • There is no specific number of number of writings that one should consider in a research review. The number varies, depending on the topic and its extant body of knowledge. • You will encounter two types of research; both are useful.
Science: what is it? Science is a systematic enterprise of gathering knowledge about the world, and organizing and condensing that knowledge into testable laws and theories. Twobasicquestionsthatdefinescience: 1. Is it possible to devise an experimental test? 2. Do the scientific findings make the world more predictable? → If the answer to either of these two questions is no, then it isn't science.
What is voodoo science? Three Different Forms of Voodoo Science: 1. Pathological science 2. Junk science 3. Pseudoscience
Pathological science Scientists: • gather “evidence” (always at the very limit of detectability) • see what they expect to see • are immune to evidence that points to a contradictory result • fool themselves • isolate themselves from sceptics • Ex. John Newman and his “energy machine”
Junk science Scientists: • Develop untenable theories, and produce little supporting evidence • Produce arguments that are specifically designed to deceive jurists and lawmakers, non-scientists • Ex. Daubertv Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (morning sickness drug caused birth defects)
Pseudoscience Scientists: • lack evidence andfill in scientific uncertainty with views based on political or religious convictions • use superstitions to support theories • Ex. Mars Effect (career prediction based on which planet was rising when individual was born)
DiscussionQuestions: 1. People say science is merely a reflection of cultural bias, and not a means of reaching objective truth. Do you agree or disagree?
DiscussionQuestions: 2. Scientists are rarely willing to confront voodoo science. Do you think that they should? Why do you think that they should/shouldn’t?
DiscussionQuestions: 3. Scientists generally believe that the cure for pseudoscience is to increase science literacy. Do you agree or disagree?