100 likes | 280 Views
Outcomes and Satisfaction: Adult Seating and Mobility Clinic. Penny J. Powers, PT,MS,ATP Level IV PT. Problem/question. What are the outcomes (success and areas for improvement) of the Adult Seating and Positioning Clinic?
E N D
Outcomes and Satisfaction: Adult Seating and Mobility Clinic Penny J. Powers, PT,MS,ATP Level IV PT
Problem/question • What are the outcomes (success and areas for improvement) of the Adult Seating and Positioning Clinic? • What level of satisfaction do the consumers of the Adult Seating and Mobility Clinic have with the services that they receive?
Why is this a problem? • Assistive technology( seating and mobility) is most likely to be a life long need and expense (RESNA 1998b) • No outcome measures or satisfaction data are being collected at this time. • Consumers of this clinic should have the opportunity to give satisfaction/dissatisfaction data.
Study Parameters • It was decided that this study falls into a research category that requires IRB approval at Vanderbilt. Given the formality of research design and demands of external review, this project will require 2 years to complete. This was approved at all levels.
Study: Two Part • Satisfaction data is collected at Pi Beta Phi from participants in our comprehensive treatment program. The survey has been developed “in-house” and data is analyzed by our “outcomes committee” • Satisfaction survey will be developed similar to present instruments for the consumers of the Adult Seating and Mobility Clinic
Study: cont’d • Survey questions will be submitted to committee for approval. • Survey data will be collected in conjunction with survey instrument - FEW
Study cont’d • Very little evidence exists regarding satisfaction with seating and mobility devices in the community. • The FEW – Functioning Everyday with a Wheelchair is one tool that is available that has both reliability and validity data • Collaboration with Belmont University School of Physical Therapy is desired
Timeline and progress to date • Research Team: • Penny J. Powers, PT,MS,ATP - PI • Renee Brown, PhD, PT – Faculty Belmont University • Students: Elizabeth Codington • Sarah Lyons • Larry Pemberton • Daniel Rogers
Progression of project • Forms, informed consent and procedures developed • IRB completed and submitted – January 2009 – multiple revisions. Final approval received 3/30/09. • IRB submitted to Belmont for secondary approval – obtained -April 2009
Data Collection • Data collection has been initiated May 2009 – 22 subjects have provided informed consent. • Project completion expected by March 29,2010 prior to expiration of IRB