1 / 25

Working Table Cultural He ritag e

Working Table Cultural He ritag e. the Hague 2012. G.W.O. Boissevain Msc. Content. Working Table Projects Grey zone Cases. Working Table Cultural Heritage. Meetings and projects. Projects 2009-2011 Cultural Heritage Portfolio >>> report (2011)

nolan-prince
Download Presentation

Working Table Cultural He ritag e

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Working Table Cultural Heritage the Hague 2012 G.W.O. Boissevain Msc

  2. Content • Working Table • Projects • Grey zone • Cases

  3. WorkingTable Cultural Heritage

  4. Meetings and projects • Projects • 2009-2011 • Cultural Heritage Portfolio >>> report (2011) • Redevelopment of Cultural Heritage properties • 2012-2013… • Basic information about Cultural Heritage (per country) • Strategies for the “grey zone” 2009 June 2009 Stockholm • 2010 Feb 2010 Rome March 2010 web meeting Nov 2010 Amsterdam 2011 April 2011 web meeting May 2011 Londen • 2012 • January 2012 web meeting • April 2012 Stockholm • June 2012 web meeting • Sept 2012 web meeting • Oct 2012 video meeting • 2013 • Jan 2013 workshop ?

  5. Portfolio of the State A Basic need Related to goals of the State B Reserve (flexible) • For strategic goals or future plans C Obsolete No strategic goal or future plans D For sale • For sale to market State ownership Private ownership

  6. Portfolio of the State Grey zone A Basic need Related to goals of the State B Reserve (flexible) • For strategic goals or future plans C Obsolete No strategic goal or future plans D For sale • For sale to market State ownership Private ownership Not necessary for the State Necessary for the State STRATEGIES

  7. Portfolio of the State Grey zone A Basic need Related to goals of the State B Reserve (flexible) • For strategic goals or future plans C Obsolete No strategic goal or future plans D For sale • For sale to market State ownership Private ownership Not necessary for the State Necessary for the State STRATEGIES Keep properties Look for various forms of use (incl. temporary flexible contracts) Look for alternative forms of financial arrangements Develop markets and users Look for alternative forms of use, financial arrangements and forms of ownership

  8. Cases

  9. 1. Rent and open to public • Salsta Castle, 1672-78 • State owned (Sweden). • Problem • Difficulties to cover costs by rental income • Long-term tenant while keeping the castle open for the public (two last tenants went bankrupt). • Goal • Keeping it open for the public; • Long-term lease. • . • Strategy • The tenant rents part of the castle for conferences and other events. • Rent increases over three years. • The tenant must give guided tours in the castle (min. three times a year) and is allowed to use the whole castle for tours as a part of conferences and events. • Promotion of success of the tenants business.

  10. 2. Develop historic site Bohus Fortress, Sweden a ruin since 1789 Problem • Maintenance problematic due to lack of resources, neglect, inappropriate conservation. • No basic infrastructure for visitors. Goal • to become one of the most known historical places to visit in Scandinavia, • to attract more than 170 000 income generating visitors yearly • contribute strongly to regional and local social development. Strategy • 10 year development plan in cooperation with the municipality, 2010 – 2020 • Municipal company for the development and funding. Bohus is participating in IKON, an Interreg Project financed by EU 2009-2012 .

  11. 3. Potential tenants Blaker skanse, North of Oslo. Part of the historic defence line against Sweden. Transformed in a college. • 10 buildings, over 7 000 m2, from 1683 – 1977 • Protected by the Cultural Heritage Act. • In 2011 placed in the small portfolio with grant directly financed by Parliament. • Problem • Vacant since 2003. • Contracts with private organisations without results. • Weak property market in the area. • Goal • Find potential tenants who are willing to pay. • Strategy • Negotiation of a small private company and an association of artists to rent the property at a cost as low as possible. The outcome of this process is uncertain. • If no satisfactory solution is reached, state ownership may be questioned.

  12. 4. Choices for re-use National Gallery, Oslo, Norway • 9000 m2, from 1882, 1908 to 1924 • Protected by the Cultural Heritage Act • Central location • Problem • Museum for Arts, Crafts and Design will move into a new building in 2017-18. • Heated public debate on the use of the building and the adjoining public space • What level of investment is politically acceptable? • Choice for one large or for several smaller institutions? • The University museum of Cultural History may be interested, but have not committed themselves yet. • Goal • Re-use • Strategy • Four different scenarios for future use are developed to stimulate strategic discussions in the government.

  13. 5. Public consultation • Peschiera del Garda (Verona), Italy • Former barracks (33.500 m2) • Problem • New approach to redevelopment for State property by Agenzia del Demanio; • Goal • Create conditions for an public-public partnership between the State players and local Authorities; • Long lease concession (up to 50 years) for private national/international parties; to be rented by the State; • Strategy • Public consultation as new tool for participation of citizens, companies and financial parties;  • Agreement between National investments and developing Agency and the National Association of Italian Municipalities; • Adapted town planning of the Historic Centre by Municipality (2011); • Scenarios for converting registered property with public, social and rental functions (mostly tourist-accommodation and commercial ).

  14. 6. Redevelop heritage • Hembrug complex, Zaanstad, the Netherlands • Former guns and munitions factory + MOD test site; Good location (industry, Amsterdam) on major shipping route. • 42,5 ha with 125 derelict industrial buildings (65 listed buildings) dating from 1897 to 2003 ; 90.000m2; • Woods, canals, nature reserve, etc • Problem • Soil pollution and zoning (ships with dangerous substances) limit use; • Since 2003 vacant, no clear redevelopment policy; • Reluctant (local and State) authorities. • Goal • Redevelop and sell • Strategy • Agreement between State, Province and Local Council about step-by-step approach with open end; • Restoration of first of 65 listed monuments (2012); • Cleaning of soil pollution (oil, mustard gas, etc); • Short term contracts and (temporary) use; Temporary activities and use to cherish location; See and love it.

  15. 7.Redevelop heritage • Industrial complex since 1800, KAIKUKATU 5, Helsinki, Finland • Grain silos, a smithy and foundry, a mill and storage, different type of industrial usage. • Good location but not yet prime. • Region transforming from industrial to offices and housing. • Problem • Major contamination fond. • Demolition as an option for 3 of the 5 buildings due to protection problematic. • Transformation problematic due to CH protection. • Goal • Property class A with safe and healthy office spaces, after years of "grey zone". • Strategy • New zoning makes transformation and demolition possible. • Plans for about 15.000 m2 of new or renovated office for Tax Administration with a total investment budget of around 52 million euro.

  16. 8.Less than balance value • Offices, Heerlen, The Netherlands • 43.500m2 offices (1974-84) , since 2009 partially vacant • Excellent location; Excellent technical condition; • Partially in use as temporary offices for starting firms, • Problem • Still in use by Governmental Revenue office (6.000m2) • Heritage of the coal age (National Mining Museum) • Office for city council cancelled due to economical crisis; • Too large for mono-function; • Shrinkage region with high unemployment • Maintenance costs and balance sheet value (15 million) • Goal • Decrease costs • Strategy • Creative workshop with stakeholders (April 2011); • Accept loss on balance sheet of 14,5 million: Sold for 0,5 million to private company with help of municipally (May 2012) • Development into urban farming, offices, creative and cultural functions and housing for students. Creation of est. new 700 workplaces.

  17. 9.Better business model • Blokhuispoort, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands • Former State prison (since 1499-2007) • Since 2007 many temporary cultural activities and users (a.o. 120 creative businesses) and museum (2010-2012); • Strong relation to the city; of great social importance for inhabitants of Leeuwarden; historical site (WO II) with many monumental (listed) buildings; • Problem • Temporary activities do not pay rent; • Redevelopment only possible with a solution for parking; • High balance sheet value, maintenance and protection costs; • Strong local pressure groups and squatters. • Goal • Redevelopment and sale • Strategy • Market consultation (2011/12) as base for redevelopment; • Agreement with city council expected (2012) • End of temporary use for free; • Develop parking facilities in the city centre.

  18. 10. Uneconomical offices • EROTTAJA, Helsinki, Finland • Sell government owned offices, • Very good location with enough market potential. • Problem • Large repairs (accessibility, air conditioning, etc) necessary to meet today's workplace requirements. • Location not suitable for Finnish Customs or any other government use. • Investment impractical and/or uneconomical. • Only developers are interested. They see only risks and the risks affect the price. • Goal • Sell to market parties. • Strategy • Adapt current zoning for public buildings.

  19. 11. Overcome limitations • Dømmesmoen in Agder, Norway Former academy of horticulture, since 2010 • 147 acre, 25 buildings from 1700 – 2002, 10 000 m2, (several protected) • archaeological sites, landscape and nature preservation zones. • Strong wish of further state ownership to guarantee preservation (local and national); • Problem • limitations due to preservation rules, limited possibilities to adaptation to new use • The project (started in 2006) did not succeed in finding users; • Rent within current regulations for Statsbyggs activities not possible; • No alternative governmental tenant found. • Goal • Sell property (2009) • Strategy • with approval from the minister, the property is sold to Grimstad municipality at approx. 3 000 000 nok (March 2012)

  20. Cases (1) Concept

  21. Cases (2) Concept

  22. Questions • Compare strategies • Interesting subjects? • What is applicable at home? • Cultural Heritage portfolio: • Specific policy needed ? • As part of Real Estate policy ?

  23. Questions?

More Related