100 likes | 107 Views
Explore different strategies to promote the creation, evaluation, and use of high-ROI IT applications that have limited private funding. Open source licenses and approaches can enable public investment, collaboration, and reusability across projects.
E N D
And now for somethingcompletely different! Thomas Kalil tkalil@berkeley.edu CFP 2004 April 22, 2004
Not going to talk about • Linux • Apache • OpenOffice • Mozilla • Python • MYSQL • Etc.
Premises • There are some potential IT applications with high social ROI and low private ROI • Either: • Applications are not provided at all, or • Companies have very limited budgets for research, product development, evaluation, etc – which limits quality and impact • Big potential payoff because of low marginal costs
Premises • We should experiment with different ways to promote creation, evaluation and use of these applications • Might involve government, foundations, social enterprises, companies, consortia … • Open sources licenses and approaches may have a role to play in these experiments
Example: reading software • Goals for reading software • Help ensure that every child can read by the 4th grade • Enable children who are behind 1-2 grades behind to catch up – effective as one-on-one tutor • Fun and easy to use • Rigorous, third-party, experimental evaluation • Current market for K-12 educational software not very attractive
Social payoff from high-quality, low-cost reading software • 38% of 4th graders can’t read and understand a paragraph from children’s book – as high as 70% in inner-cities • 75% of high-school drop-outs report reading difficulties • By middle school – children who read well read 10 million words/year, vs. less than 100K words for children with reading difficulties
Age-Appropriate Books Per Household 199 2.7 0.04
Other possible examples • Software for human rights organizations (e.g. Martus) • Software to thwart state-sponsored censorship and surveillance • Public health information systems that increase childhood immunization rates • K-12 software for math and science education that could increase U.S. performance (currently 18th out of 20th) • Software for adult literacy, GED equivalence
Different approaches for support • Grants for R&D, pilots, evaluation • Large cash prize for software that meets certain specs • Guaranteed purchase for software that meets specs • Support could be linked to requirement for OSS license
Why open source? • Public investment would not be stranded • Multiple companies or organizations could be involved in marketing, distribution, after-sales support • Could allow for both high quality (with public support for R&D) and low-cost (no need for firms to recapture R&D costs) • Potential for re-use across projects • Potential for people to fix bugs, add or suggest new features, etc. • BSD license could allow for proprietary enhancements