90 likes | 257 Views
Malmgren, Harold B. (1961). “Information, Expectations, and the Theory of the Firm,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 399-421. Group 3: Jason Franken Prasanna Karhade Hsiao-Ching Lee Jennifer Shen Marko Madunic. Information, Expectations, and the Theory of the Firm. Goals:
E N D
Malmgren, Harold B. (1961). “Information, Expectations, and the Theory of the Firm,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 399-421. Group 3: Jason Franken Prasanna Karhade Hsiao-Ching Lee Jennifer Shen Marko Madunic
Information, Expectations, and the Theory of the Firm Goals: • Operationalization of the Coasean approach to the theory of the firm • Combined knowledge-based approach (Penrose, 1959) to the theory of the firm with the contractual approach to the firm • Malmgren analyzed concepts such as “business culture,” previously not acknowledged in 1960s economics research literature
Information, Expectations, and the Theory of the Firm • Used market failure to develop a knowledge-based theory of the FIRM • Central question: “Is there any economic reason why individuals could not perform his/her own service in return for a market-determined price without tying into long term contracts?” • Transaction costs in using price mechanisms – costs of collecting information on relevant sets of events • Markets with heterogeneous transactions - incentive to combine events or activities into one bundle by arranging long-term contracts • Producers and purchasers become one market unit by integration (reduction of fluctuations, and stability)
Information, Expectations, and the Theory of the Firm • The firm is more adaptive to changes within the boundaries of the firm itself • Firm can control some of its internal information by intentional planning better than what would emerge spontaneously in the market • Impossibility of perfect information (bounded rationality, asymmetric information, and environmental uncertainty) and complexity of interdependencies • Learning from experience- firms do what they have learned to be profitable in the past • Profitable firms successfully communicate information and expectations to investors
Information, Expectations, and the Theory of the Firm • There is a great amount of interdependence in a complex system • Firm’s advantage over market: reducing and eliminating the costs of finding out relevant prices • Cost of specialization due to unsolved coordination problems (bottleneck problem) • Innovation in individual activities result in an uneven development of tools, equipment and components
Information, Expectations, and the Theory of the Firm • The greater authority of hierarchy facilitates communication and coordination between production stages so that decisions are based upon convergent expectations (when plans are not independent) • Lack of knowledge about the inner workings of complementary products and other forms of transactional complexity can produce a “divergence of expectations” among the producers • Malmgren clarified how knowledge and the boundaries of the firm interact • Aligning the knowledge and expectations of the parties who need to cooperate in production
Information, Expectations, and the Theory of the Firm • Within a firm, a wider range of information is gathered and shared; otherwise divergent expectations are supplanted by a common information base from which common projections are made • Fiat can efficiently, if not always optimally, resolve uncertainty about appropriate technological approaches, creating convergent expectations within the firm
Information, Expectations, and the Theory of the Firm • The exercise of authority in the form of managerial fiat in response to changes in the environment provides a reason why firms exist • Many contingencies cannot be foreseen, or it is too costly to do so • How exactly contingencies impact on the preferred level of delegation may be difficult to specify ex ante • There is a need for ex post decision-making • Centralized decision-making (discretionary authority) becomes a preferable mechanism of coordination (superior understanding of how contingencies influence interdependencies • Allocation of decisions by central managers to specialists
Information, Expectations, and the Theory of the Firm • Corporate culture: • A set of stable firm-specific rules that delimits intra-firm behavior. • Corporate culture may dampen various sorts of proclivities to moral hazard, and thus harmonize incentives