1 / 4

what

what. New: draft-helvoort-ccamp-fs-priority Proposes to change text in informational RFC4427: Recovery (Protection and Restoration) Terminology for GMPLS. why.

nora-white
Download Presentation

what

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. what New: draft-helvoort-ccamp-fs-priority Proposes to change text in informational RFC4427: Recovery (Protection and Restoration) Terminology for GMPLS

  2. why In the current RFC4427 the protection switch the priority of Forced Switch (FS) and Signal Fail on Protection (SF-P) is not aligned with the priorities defined by ITU-T in e.g. G.841. Because in-band protection switch commands are sent on the protection path, SF-P should have a higher priority than FS. In this case a FS will not disrupt traffic.

  3. how • In RFC4427 make the distinction: • protection schemes which DO NOT use an in-band communication channel:FS has highest priority (over SF-P) • protection schemes which DO use an in-band communication channel:SF-P has the highest priority (over FS)

  4. how (continued) Options: • Replace RFC4427 • Issue an RFC4427 bis • Issue an ERRATUM to add a note. Huub.van.Helvoort@Huawei.com

More Related