1 / 28

Lessons Learned Cpt. Federico GENTILI FCMD DJSE1 FE JCC

Allied Force Command Madrid. Lessons Learned Cpt. Federico GENTILI FCMD DJSE1 FE JCC. Lessons Learned

norah
Download Presentation

Lessons Learned Cpt. Federico GENTILI FCMD DJSE1 FE JCC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Allied Force Command Madrid Lessons LearnedCpt. Federico GENTILI FCMD DJSE1 FE JCC

  2. Lessons Learned • Lessons Learned describes activities relating to learning from experience to achieve improvements. In a military context, this means reduced operational risk, increased efficiency, and improved operational effectiveness. • Lessons can be derived from any activity - daily events, exercises, training, etc. • Learning, in any organization, involves three generic stages: identification, action, and institutionalization.

  3. NATO Lessons Learned Process

  4. Capturing Observations • Provisions should be in place for all personnel regardless of rank or branch to document observed problems, shortfalls and successes. • Ideally, the person reporting an observation will attach their name to the observation. However, if a degree of anonymity is desired, provisions must be in place to identify the observation with the appropriate branch or unit to allow a clear basis for further staffing if required.

  5. Tools to Capture and Manage Observations • Methods for collecting observations should be as simple as possible (Observation Report Form) and should complement procedures for processing and sharing lessons. • Software solutions can make tracking, processing and sharing observations easier.

  6. Managing Observations • Observations should be reviewed as soon as possible after capture to filter out unsuitable observations and allow for the capture of additional information.

  7. COLLECTION PROCESS APPROVED FINDINGS USED FOR NEXT EX IMPLEMENTATION QUESTIONNAIRE DRAFT QUESTIONNAIRE BACK TO LLWG QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE TA PPs APPROVED FINDINGS IN THE LLs DATABASE (OPEN to ALL) 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 QUESTIONNAIRE SENT TO LLWG QUESTIONNAIRE CHECK, DRAFT OF PP TO THE CHAIN of COMMAND FINDINGS SHARED WITH JALLC and NATO community QUESTIONNAIRE REVISED BY CELLs HEADs

  8. APPROVED FCHQ MD LLs workflow and duties FC HQ Staff 40’s TREX BRANCH HEAD: LI / LL -SIGNS and SUBMIT LLs PPs to CC; -POPULATES LLs DATABASE; -LINKS with LLs COMMUNITY. DJSE 2 DJSE 1 JHQ FE COS/DOS 4 pax JCC JHQ FE COS/DOS TEC REPORTS TO REPORTS TO SitCell JCC 4 pax TEC JLSG 1 pax SitCell -FIND OUT LI or LL; -COLLECT THEM; -GET THEM APPROVED - SEND TREX BRANCH. LLWG 2 JLSG LLWG1 FSE 1 pax 1pax CHAIRED by Cpt. GENTILI CHAIRED by ????? ISAF CPT 1 pax FSE 1pax TRANSITION 1 pax (All personnel part of LLWG1&2 is to have this framework task mentioned in his j.d.)

  9. Cooperative Longbow/Lancer 2012

  10. Ex CoLW/CoLR 2012 After Action Review / Lessons Learned Process COLR EXCON, O/T, TA COLR DAAR/HW Observations COLW EXCON, O/T, TA COLW DAAR/HW Observations DAILY NLT 8 JUN 12 COLW/LR EXSPT, DISTAFF, RLS, CIS, etc. COLW/LR AART Observations Observations COLW/LR Participating Nations, supporting organizations, etc. Draft FER NLT 8 JUL 12 NLT 15 JUN 12 FER

  11. This button is for all the participant to Exercise. This button is specific for Longbow Observers/Trainer

  12. EX COLW/LR 12 OBSERVATION (LI) REPORT FORM

  13. EX COLW/LR 12 HOT WASH UP - AAR

  14. NATO / PfP UNCLASSIFIED RELEASABLE TO EXERCISE “COOPERATIVE LONGBOW/LANCER 2012” COOPERATIVE LONGBOW 2012 DAILY HOT WASH UP 28 May 2012

  15. NATO / PfP UNCLASSIFIED RELEASABLE TO EXERCISE “COOPERATIVE LONGBOW/LANCER 2012” COOPERATIVE LONGBOW 2012 Total Daily Injects Sent: 48 Total Completed: 28 Total Ongoing: 58

  16. NATO / PfP UNCLASSIFIED RELEASABLE TO EXERCISE “COOPERATIVE LONGBOW/LANCER 2012” COOPERATIVE LONGBOW 2012 Daily Injects Summary

  17. 100% Our Goals!

  18. NATO / PfP UNCLASSIFIED RELEASABLE TO EXERCISE “COOPERATIVE LONGBOW/LANCER 2012” COOPERATIVE LONGBOW 2012 TO BE IMPROVED • De-confliction in case of urgent activations incoming at the same moment by different means. TO BE SUSTAINED Approach of the Staff to the Journalists during a visit; Rotation within the Branch to create backups.

  19. NATO / PfP UNCLASSIFIED RELEASABLE TO EXERCISE “COOPERATIVE LONGBOW/LANCER 2012” COOPERATIVE LONGBOW 2012 Lessons Identified G6 • SUSTAIN: • High motivation. All the personnel knows about his specific task and made big progress in dealing with CIS support for NATO OPS. • IMPROVE: • Language skills. To understand the whole NATO and CIS terminology.

  20. NATO / PfP UNCLASSIFIED RELEASABLE TO EXERCISE “COOPERATIVE LONGBOW/LANCER 2012” COOPERATIVE LONGBOW 2012 Lessons Identified TOC • SUSTAIN: • The particular pro-activity of the personnel. They took over immediately recommendations from O/T; • Implementation of some IM tools. After less than 20 hours duty time TOC-watch was operational and successfully used within MNB-HQ. • IMPROVE: • Preparation phase. At the beginning of an exercise like this with so many people with different backgrounds working more intensive and long preparation is necessary. In order to properly setup procedures and working practices.

  21. NATO / PfP UNCLASSIFIED RELEASABLE TO EXERCISE “COOPERATIVE LONGBOW/LANCER 2012” COOPERATIVE LONGBOW 2012 Lessons Identified • TO BE IMPROVE • 1. MANNING • POLAD • PAO • COM LCC 2. LONGER WARM-UP PERIOD • INFO tools practice/FAT • Time to build BDE Staff • Involvement of O/T 3. 2nd TRAINING AUDIENCE • 4. PREPARATION PHASE • Lack of CIS equipment 5. LANGUAGE SKILLS 6. DISTAFF COORDINATION • LOCON & HICON coordination • DISTAFF TRAINING sessions

  22. NATO / PfP UNCLASSIFIED RELEASABLE TO EXERCISE “COOPERATIVE LONGBOW/LANCER 2012” COOPERATIVE LONGBOW 2012 Lessons Identified • TO BE SUSTAIN • 1. BDE BATTLE RHYTHM • 2. KLT SESSIONS • Agenda • Different audiences • Teach & Training philosophy • 3. SUITABLE INJECTS • 4. WHITE CELL INVOLVEMENT • 5. TA INTERACTION WITH LOCON • 6. COMMITMENT OF DISTAFF & TA

  23. SECTION 1 EXERCISE ABSTRACT AND DESCRIPTION • References: A. ACO Exercise Specification (EXSPEC), COOPERATIVE LONGBOW 2012 (COLW 12), dated 15 July 2012 B. ACO Exercise Specification (EXSPEC), COOPERATIVE LANCER 2012 (COLR 12), dated 15 July 2012 C. IMSM-0615-2005, Operational Capabilities Concept (OCC) Evaluation and Feedback (E&F) Programme, dated 10 Aug 2005Exercise COLW 12 was a NATO-Partners for Peace (PfP) Command Post Exercise (CPX) designed to provide training at the Multinational Brigade (MNB) level. 1 Exercise COLR 12 was a NATO-PfP Live Exercise (LIVEX) designed to provide training to a Multinational Battalion (MNBN) focused at the Company (Coy) level. SACEUR was the Officer Scheduling the Exercise (OSE) and COM Allied Force Command Madrid (FCMD) was the Officer Conducting the Exercise (OCE). Co-Exercise Directors were BG Savarese, FCMD and COL Stamenov, Army of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia[1] (Host Nation [HN]). 2 Both exercises were conducted at the Krivolak Training area (one hour south of the capital city of Skopje) from 21-29 May 2012. COLW 12 was executed at Camp Pepeliste in fixed buildings that were wired for digital information services. COLR 12 occurred at Camp Strela and surrounding training areas on the actual maneuver training area. 3 ../..[1] Turkey recognizes the Republic of Macedonia with its constitutional name.

  24. SECTION 2 EXERCISE LESSONS IDENTIFIED

  25. ?

More Related