1 / 10

Retention Reviews

Retention Reviews. Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences. Retention Reviews. Frequency Scope Evaluative standard. Annual until tenure Review of prior academic year except UNAC fourth year comprehensive review Potential for success. Retention Review Process. UAFT

norah
Download Presentation

Retention Reviews

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Retention Reviews Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences

  2. Retention Reviews Frequency Scope Evaluative standard Annual until tenure Review of prior academic year except UNAC fourth year comprehensive review Potential for success

  3. Retention Review Process UAFT • Chair • College Peer Review Committee • Dean UNAC • Regular Retention • Chair (tenured) • Dean • Fourth Year

  4. Format of File • Organized by workload category • Table of Contents • Labels on divider tabs in words (not numbers keyed to another page) • One medium-sized binder for retention reviews; no plastic sleeves. Be selective.

  5. Contents of Retention File • Vita • Self-review + Goals & Objectives • Workload agreement for period under review • Annual Activity Report(s) for period under review • Section on each workload category (teaching, research, service) • Past reviews (findings & recommendations) • Verification of appropriate degree (certified transcript or statement that transcript is on file at OAA; included year to year)

  6. Self-Review • Address • Teaching • Service • Research / Creative Activity • Professional agenda • Analyze and evaluate; don’t just list. Thoughtful discussion is valued. • Articulate goals & objectives either in a separate section or as part of self-review

  7. Contents of File: Teaching • List of Courses taught (indicate new preps) • Course syllabi • Student evaluation summaries * • Other suggestions • Evaluation by peers • Innovations in teaching • Evidence of student success • Student research • Student Showcase • Student publication; scholarships; exit tests

  8. Contents of File: Service • Working toward fulfillment of different types of service, but not necessarily all at once • University • Departmental committees • Faculty governance • University committees or task forces • Professional (disciplinary, regional or national) • Public/Community (professionally related and recognized; not just good citizenship)

  9. Contents of File: Research • Products of research or creative activity • Publication • Grants awarded • Presentation or exhibition • Progress in research agenda • Manuscripts in draft? Under review? In revision? • Grant proposals submitted • Other

  10. Contents of File: Professional Development • Advancement of professional skills; development of new competencies • CAFÉ • Disciplinary development • New technology

More Related