530 likes | 681 Views
Poverties. Robert Walker. Working assumptions. Poverty does not exist Low income exists A consequence of unequal income distribution. Income distribution. Number of people. Low income. Income. Working assumptions. Poverty does not exist Low income exists
E N D
Poverties Robert Walker
Working assumptions • Poverty does not exist • Low income exists • A consequence of unequal income distribution
Income distribution Number of people Low income Income
Working assumptions • Poverty does not exist • Low income exists • A consequence of unequal income distribution • Low income in relation to need - hardship exists
Income distribution Number of people Low income Income
Welfare distribution Number of people Hardship Income to needs Income
Need is a relative concept Socially constructed Poverty is a politically constructed Defined arbitrarily Predicates action Poverty does not exist Low income exists A consequence of unequal income distribution Low income in relation to need - hardship exists Working assumptions
30 second summary • Poverty is not inevitable • Poverty is differentiated • Not one poverty but many • Poverty is shaped by time • Begins and ends • Shaped also by space • Poverty is shaped by individual agency • Poverty is experienced by people
Median 1/2 1/2 Setting the poverty threshold Poverty line Number of people Equivalised income Poverty Income to needs Income
Median 1/2 1/2 Changing the poverty threshold60 per cent of median Poverty line Number of people Equivalised income Poverty Income to needs Income
Median 60% 40% Changing the poverty threshold60 per cent of median Poverty line Number of people Equivalised income Poverty Income to needs Income
Incidence of poverty Poverty line Number of people Poverty Income to needs Income
Poverty line Number of people Poverty Income to needs
Poverty line Number of people Poverty Income to needs
Severity Income to needs Poverty Poverty line Poverty gap Severity mean Number of people
Three year measures Incidence of poverty Number of people Annual Cumulative t1 t2 t3 t4 t5
Prevalence of poverty, 1990s Source OECD, 2001
Prevalence of poverty types, mid 1990s Long term poverty as percentage of three year ever poor Source: OECD, 2001
Types of poverty:Relative risk, UK Source: OECD, 2001
Types of poverty:Relative risk, US & UK UK Source: OECD, 2001 USA Poor at least once Always poor Permanent income poor
UK USA Italy:Relative risk Italy Source: OECD, 2001 Poor at least once Always poor Permanent income poor
Types of poverty Persistent Non poor Transient Recurrent Income Poverty threshold Occasional Chronic Permanent Time
Childhood poverty in the US: composition of the 38% who suffer poverty Source: Walker with Ashworth, 1994
Characteristics of poor US children Transient Occasional Recurrent Persistent Non- white White One parent Chronic Permanent Two parent
Poverty is shaped by time • Distribution of poverty across time helps to determine: • The kind of poverty experienced • Transient poverty differs from permanent poverty which differs from repeated spells • The incidence of poverty • Short spells mean higher prevalence • Long spells mean higher concentration
Poverty is shaped by time • Distribution of poverty across time helps to determine: • The kind of poverty experienced • Transient poverty differs from permanent poverty which differs from repeated spells • The incidence of poverty • Short spells mean higher prevalence • Long spells mean higher concentration • Structures and institutions affect the: • The incidence and distribution of poverty inducing events • The risk that such events will lead to poverty
Poverty is shaped by time • Distribution of poverty across time helps to determine: • the incidence of poverty • Short spells mean higher prevalence • Long spells mean higher concentration • The kind of poverty experienced • Transient poverty differs from permanent poverty which differs from repeated spells • Structures and institutions affect the: • The incidence and distribution of poverty inducing events • The risk that such events will lead to poverty • Individual agency does likewise
Budgeting Over time Deferring Forgoing Borrowing Managing demand Shop frequently Pander to wants Resist children Minimise risk Coping strategies
Budgeting Increase income Get job Sell non-essentials Delay paying bills Work on the side Cash in insurance Pawn valuables Sell essentials Seek charities Petty crime Prostitution Begging +ve £ Social acceptability -ve Coping strategies
Poverty is experienced as: • Relative Jeff Moore
Poverty is experienced as: • Relative • Loss of dignity Gordon Parks
Poverty is experienced as: • Relative • Loss of dignity • Being labelled The Guardian
Poverty is experienced as: • Relative • Loss of dignity • Being labelled • Doing without Murdo MacLoed
Poverty is experienced as: • Relative • Loss of dignity • Being labelled • Doing without • Being stressed Gordon Parks
Poverty is experienced as: • Relative • Loss of dignity • Being labelled • Doing without • Being stressed • Being driven to crime The Guardian
Conclusions • Poverty is not inevitable • Not one poverty but many • Poverty is shaped by time and space • Poverty is multi-dimensional • Poverty is shaped by agency and experience • Policy must address • Different kinds of poverty • Intervene in people’s trajectories
What to take account of Personal Consumption PC PC + SPR Shared Property Rights(Resources) State Provided Commodities PC + SPR + SPC PC + SPC + SPC + Assets PC + SPC + SPC + Assets + Dignity PC+SPC+SPC+Assets+Dignity+Autonomy Source: Baulch (1996)