240 likes | 327 Views
A Review of Impacts to UFE and Load Ratio Share Based on AV Profile ID Changes. Presented by ERCOT Staff to the Profiling Working Group 10/26/2005. Run Test Settlements to See Effects of AV. Prepare test environment to run settlements for different scenarios
E N D
A Review of Impacts to UFE and Load Ratio ShareBased on AV Profile ID Changes Presented by ERCOT Staff to the Profiling Working Group 10/26/2005
Run Test Settlements to See Effects of AV • Prepare test environment to run settlements for different scenarios • Select a sample of 30 (or so) days to analyze • Run test settlements with currently assigned Profile IDs and capture results • In test environment, change Profile IDs as directed by the Annual Validation Process • Run test settlements with changed Profile IDs and capture results • Compare changes in UFE and Load Ratio Share
RESHIWR daily kWh / RESHIWR monthly kWh RESLOWR daily kWh / RESLOWR monthly kWh Which Days to Analyze? • Created ERCOT-wide Residential load profiles • Weighted Weather Zone load profile by ESI ID counts • Considered Heating Degree Days and Cooling Degree Days • Looked at daily kWh as a percentage of monthly kWh • Ultimately segmented based on the following ratio:
Those ERCOT guys sure seem to know what they’re doing... ERCOT LP Staff’s Recommendations • Proceed with submission of 2005 Annual Validation Profile ID changes • Continue PWG-sponsored efforts to improve the Profile Type assignment algorithm • Continue consideration of shifting Profile Type calculation responsibilities to ERCOT primarily to allow use of several years worth of data in the algorithm