Kerjasama Antar Peneliti

1. Kerjasama Antar Peneliti Ocky Karna Radjasa Department of Marine Science Diponegoro Univeristy ocky_radjasa@yahoo.com;ocky_radjasa@undip.ac.id

2. Increasing pressures on University • Competition for “brains“ and funds (horizontal diversity) • Competition for academic performance and reputation as a result of performance-based funding, rankings etc. (vertical diversity)

3. Variabel Utama Pemetaan Kinerja Penelitian Perguruan Tinggi • Ketersediaan SDM (Guru Besar, Doktor, S2) • Keberadaan dan aktivitas pusat penelitian/pusat studi/pusat kajian • Sumber dana penelitian • Luaran penelitian • Pengelolaan Penelitian di Perguruan Tinggi • Ketersediaan sarana dan prasarana penelitian

4. THE-QS World University Rankings • International Student 5% • Score calculated based on the proportion of total students that are international. • International Staff 5% • Score calculated based on the proportion of Full Time Equivalent (FTE) faculty that are international. • Academic Peer Review 40% • Academics indicate which field they specialise in and then list up to 30 universities they regard as leaders in this field. • Composite score drawn from peer review survey (which is divided into five subject areas). Results compiled based on three years’ worth of responses totaling 6,354 in 2008. • Safeguards against individuals voting for their own university strengthened. • Rise of Asian universities is least apparent in this ranking. • Citation/Staff 20% • Score based on research performance factored against the size of the research body . • Five years of publication data with citations from Scopus. • Number of citations is divided by the number of FTE staff to give an indication of the density of research. • Staff/Student 20% • Score based simply on the student faculty ratio, the higher the number of faculty per student the higher the score. • Full- and part-time numbers for staff and students obtained; FTEs used throughout as far as possible. • Employer Review 10% • Score based on responses to employer survey. 2,339 responses in 2008. • Recruiter names are sourced through QS databases, media partners and partner schools & universities. • Responses are weighted by region to reach a final score. THE-QS Rankings

5. Measuring Research Quality • Classic measure of research quality • Citations per staff member (not per paper) • Number of publication per staff • Source: Scopus (http://www.scopus.com 12/6/09

6. Perbandingan Jumlah Publikasi Antar Negara di ASEAN

8. Perbandingan Jumlah Sitasi Antar Negara di ASEAN

9. Problem faced by researchers: some facts • Overlapped equipment • Overlapped topics • Less interaction • Individual endeavor • Limited networking • Lack of funding • Partial results

10. LOKAKARYA LEMBAGA PENELITIAN (2006) KLASTER KEDOKTERAN DAN KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT KLASTER AGROINDUSTRI KLASTER SOSIAL HUMANIORA KLASTER SAINS TEKNOLOGI ARAH KLASTER UNDIP TAHUN 2007 • KLASTER KETAHANAN PANGAN: Agroindustri • KLASTER KESEHATAN DAN OBAT-OBATAN: Kedokteran, Kesehatan masyarakat, gizi, farmasi • KLASTER ENERGI: Nuklir, bionergi, geothermal, hidro dll • KLASTER SOSIAL EKONOMI HUMANIORA: Ekonomi, sosial, politik, budaya • KLASTER SAIN TEKNOLOGI: Teknologi material baru, nano technology, informasi, transportasi, pertahanan, control system

11. Change research phylosophy: CoE Research cluster Research group individual

12. Balance of Excellence and Diversity Academic and Competitive agenda Academic and Social agenda Research Cluster Graduate School Internal and external stakeholders Develop and support strong research/ Field/unit/department Become internationally visible Develop high level research and teaching Cater the need of student, junior staff, community

13. Developing research collaboration • Definition: the working together of researchers to achieve the common goal of • Research Cluster • Center of Excellence • Interdisciplinary research groups • Across-sector: A-B-G

14. Characteristics of Research Cluster • Intensive interactions • Focus area of research • Shared research facilities • Transfer of knowledge • Sustain and enhance collegiality • Interdisciplinary research groups • Intended to build capacity • In the long run to support CoE

15. Research Clusters facilitate: The sharing of research by providing the forum in which colleagues: • talk to each other about their individual work, • take the step to write together on a topic, • develop research proposals and • do research collectively

16. Characteristics of CoE • Unique research strength • National and internationally recognized expertise • Competitive academic environment • Given with targeted support to the creation of world-standard research and education bases • Elevate universities to the world’s highest echelons

17. Measurement of research collaboration • Co-authorships (Multi and international) • Senior-Junior relationship • Supervisor-student relationship • Joint patent application • Joint project proposal

18. The benefits of research collaboration • Increased knowledge • Higher scientific quality and recognition • Generation of new idea • Access to the state of the art equipment • Networking for future works

19. Graduate School and RC • The change of setting that only interdisciplinary field of study will be accommodated • Opportunity to establish and develop RC • The creation of new interdisciplinary Study Program such Biotechnology, Climate Change and Global Warming

20. Thank you for your attention