1 / 43

Mass-loss from Evolved stars : High Spatial Resolution Studies

Mass-loss from Evolved stars : High Spatial Resolution Studies. Olivier Chesneau, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur Collaborators (many…): A rmando Domiciano Bruno Lopez Sebastian Wolf Farrok Vakili Florentin Millour Luc Dessart Arnaud Collioud Tijl Verhoelst

Download Presentation

Mass-loss from Evolved stars : High Spatial Resolution Studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mass-loss from Evolved stars:High Spatial Resolution Studies Olivier Chesneau, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur Collaborators (many…): Armando Domiciano Bruno Lopez Sebastian Wolf Farrok Vakili Florentin Millour Luc Dessart Arnaud Collioud Tijl Verhoelst Romain Petrov Orsola De Marco Mikako Matsuura Eric Lagadec Daniel Bonneau Albert Zijltra Michael Min Christain Hummel ...

  2. VLTI: short technical description • VLTI+MIDI • 37 optical elements (33 reflections) • Until 200m baseline (and 350m of optical path!) • Automatisation: Active optics (M1), chopping (M2), adaptive optics, moving delay lines, Variable curvature mirrors...

  3. Preset

  4. VINCI: K band test interferometer, • No spectral dispersion, • Strong point: measurement accuracy (1% and less), • Main science objective: measurement of stellar radii • Objects studied: • Main sequence stars: • Kervella, P., Thévenin, F., Ségransan, D., et al. 2003, A&A, 404, 1087 • Kervella, P., Thévenin, F., Morel, P., Bordé, P., & Di Folco, E., 2003, A&A, 408, 681 • Kervella, P., Thévenin, F., Morel, P., et al., 2004, A&A, 413, 251 • Kervella, P., Thévenin, F., & Di Folco, E. 2004, A&A, 426, 297 • Di Folco, E., Thévenin, F., Kervella, P., et al. 2004, A&A, 426, 601 • F. Thévenin, P. Kervella, B. Pichon, P. Morel, E. Di Folco, & Y. Lebreton, 2005, accepté • Cépheids: • Kervella, P., Nardetto, N., Bersier, D., Mourard, D., et al., 2004, A&A, 416, 941, • Kervella, P., Bersier, D., Mourard, D., et al. 2004, A&A, 428, 587 ET 2004, A&A, 423, 327 • Kervella, P., Fouqué, P., Storm, J., et al. 2004, ApJ, 604, L113 • Fast rotators: • Domiciano de Souza, A., Kervella, P., Jankov, S., et al. 2003, A&A, 407, L47 • Kervella & Domiciano de Souza, 2006 accepted • Eta Car: van Boeckel, Kervella, Schöller et al., 2003, A&A, 410, L37

  5. MIDI: N band interferometer (8-13 micron) • Spectral dispersion, 30 et 230, accuracy 5-15%, 2 telescopes • First interferometer of this kind (but see Keck), • Main science goal: study of compact dusty objects • Spectral types: any with dust… • Young stars disk (all types), evolved stars (all types),… • van Boekel, R.; Min, M.; Leinert, Ch. et al., 2004, Nature, 432, 479: Herbig AeBe stars • Leinert, Ch.; van Boekel, R.; Waters, L.B.F.M.; Chesneau, O. et al., 2004, A&A, 423, 537 • Chesneau, O.; Meilland, A.; Rivinius, T.; Stee, P. et al., 2005, : Be star • Chesneau, O.; Verhoelst, T.; Lopez, B. et al., 2005, accepté, AGB, • Chesneau, O.; Min, M.; Herbst, T.et al., 2005, accepté, Eta Carinae, supergiant • Ohnaka, J.; Bergeat, T.; Driebe et al., 2005, A&A, 429, 1057 : AGB • Ohnaka, J.;Driebe, T.; Hofmann, K. et al., 2006, A&A 445 , 1015: AGB • Derroo,  P.; Van Winckel, H.; Min, M. et al., 2006astro.ph1169: post-AGB • Abraham, P.; Mosoni, L.; Henning, Th. et al. 2006astro.ph2334:FU Or object • AGNs disks, • Jaffe, W.; Meisenheimer, K.; Röttgering, H. J. A. et al., 2004, Nature, 429, 47, NGC1068 • Poncelet, A.; Perrin, G.; Sol, H., 2006, A&A, accepted, astro.ph12560,NGC1068 • 6 AGNS, 5 WR with dust, ~10 AGBs, 3 planetary nebulae, ~20 HaeBe, TTauri, massive young stars to come…

  6. AMBER: J(1.2m), H(1.6m) and K (2.2m) interferometer • Strong points: • spectral dispersion (1000,10000), • 3 télescopes recombinaison, • Multiple science goals: potential far from being explored • Objects and phenomena studied: • Main sequence: diameters, flattening and distortion, • Young stars: disk-photosphere interface, cinematic, jets, material exchanges… • Evolved stars: mass loss, molecular envelops, magnetism… • AGNs: accretion disks, jets… • Extrasolar planets: study limited tohot Jupiter ‘s, • Several papers accepted or submitted: • Wind-disk interface study of the Herbig AeBe MWC297 (Malbet et al., accepted) • Dusty environment of the B[e] supergiant CPD-57 withMIDI et AMBER (Domiciano et al., accepted) • Study of the truncated disk of the Be star, alpha Ara (Meillant, Stee et al., accepted), • Study of the binary WR+O, gamma Velorum, (Petrov, Millour, Chesneau, et al., submitted)

  7. VLTI: science contribution • 2003: • 6 papers (VINCI) versus 17 for the year, • MIDI commissioning • 2004: • 15 VLTI papers (12 VINCI, 3 MIDI) versus 27, • Active concurrence! • Keck interferometer (2 papers in 2004), • IOTA, PTI, et NPOI, • AMBER commissioning, • 2005: 14 VLTI papers (9 VINCI, 5 MIDI), • First CHARA papers (5), • Keck interferometer (5), • 30 papers published • Information from: http://olbin.jpl.nasa.gov/ • (Optical Long Baseline Interferometry News )

  8. A complementary tool Adaptive Optics: NACO Some typical numbers: . L’ PSF FWHM: 100mas, strehl~60-75%, Dec: 50-60mas . K resolution: 60mas, Strehl~20-40%, . Dynamical range: 103-104

  9. Lamers et Cassinelli, 1999 Mass loss from evolved stars: loss of spherical sphericity I- Massive stars (‘Hot’) Associated issues: . Binarity, . Rotation, . X ray generation in radiative winds, . Supergiant eruptions and instabilities, . Supernovae Ib,c, II remanent geometry . Dust production from hot stars . LBVs, . B[e], . WR of carbon type,

  10. The tip of the iceberg!

  11. Smith et al., 2002, 2003

  12. Understanding the visibilities with simple geometric models

  13. N Star flux and dust clumping N E

  14. The central star Question: what is the influence of the dust extinction on the inferred parameters of the model? Chesneau, O., Min, M., Herbst, T. et al., 2005

  15. Rotation? Binarity? Complex evolution? The B[e] phenomenon(Lamers et al. 1998) Supergiants B[e]  L*/Lsun > 104 Observations point towards asymmetrical stellar environments Zickgraf et al. (1985)

  16. VLTI/MIDI spectrum and visibilities Domiciano de Souza, Driebe, Chesneau et al. 2006 A&A (astro-ph/0510735) B[e] supergiant star CPD-57° 2874 Gaussian models: 2a = (10.10.7) + (2.60.4) (-8m) mas Axial ratio 2b/2a = 0.76 0.11 Position angle PA = 145°  6° 2a = (15.30.7) + (0.450.22) (-12m) mas Axial ratio 2b/2a = 0.80 0.10 Position angle PA = 143°  6°

  17. VLTI/AMBER spectrum and visibilities Gaussian models: 2a = (3.40.2) + (1.990.24) (-2.2m) mas Axial ratio 2b/2a = 0.53 0.03 Position angle PA = 173°  9° Br 2a = 4.50.3 mas ; =1.8 0.2 10-3m

  18. Measured sizes of CPD-57 2874

  19. The close WR+O system: gamma2 Vel P=78 days,spectroscopic parameters well constrained WR almost as bright as the O star in K No dust!

  20. Can we resolve the WR star? Not with baselines smaller than 100m in K band, Better in H and very good in J (He10830) We therefore expect a ‘simple’ binary signal

  21. O8III+WC8 star TeffWC8~60000K TeffO8III~30000K Dfluxcont=0.62 DfluxInt=0.75

  22. Distance to be revised? Hipparcos: 258+41-31 AMBER: 367+42-37 Petrov, R., Millour, F., Chesneau, O., et al., 2006, submitted To come: study of the wind-wind collision (with more data…) confirmation of distance (with much smaller error bars)

  23. Mass loss from evolved stars: loss of spherical sphericity II- Evolved ‘small’ stars (‘cool’) Associated issues: . Binarity, symbiotic systems, . Planetary nebulae geometry, . Galactic dust production, . Novae, supernovae Ia …

  24. MIDI ISO Massive AGB long pulsator OH26.5+0.6 Embedded object: mJ=17, mK=8, mN=-3! P=1559 days

  25. Complex objects: . Many opacities ignored: . Dusty opacities, . Molecular opacities, . Non-spherical geometry (always?), . Slow temporal variability, About 140h of Ats observations planned on OH/IR embedded sources! (PI: Driebe and Verhoelst) Chesneau, O., Verhoelst, T., Lopez, B., et al., 2005

  26. CPD-56°8032 and Hen2-113 • Central Stars [ De Marco et al. 97 ] • Late Wolf-Rayet [WC10] • Teff ~ 30000 K • L ~ 5000 Lo, dM/dt=8-40 10-7Mo/yr • Wind: 160- 225 km.s-1 • Nebula [ Waters et al. 98, Cohen et al. 02, De Marco et al. 02 ] • Strong IR emission  dust • Edge-on disk suspected for CPD-56°8032 (STIS/HST) • Strong PAH emission, together with crystalline silicates features • Double chemistry : C (central star, ‘hot’ disk) and O (‘cold’ disk ?) • Distance: ~1.5 kpc Col: A. Collioud (OCA,Fr), E. Lagadec (OCA, Fr), O. De Marco (AMNH, USA), A. Zijlstra (UMIST, UK), S. Wolf (MPIA, Ger), A. Acker (Obs Strasb., Fr), G. Clayton (LSU,USA), B. Lopez (OCA,Fr)

  27. HST NACO NACO MIDI

  28. HST NACO L’ M’ • Central source magnitude in L’ and M’ respectively 300 and 800 more luminous than any [WR] models! • Central object resolved by NACO! FWHM~155mas Lagadec, E., Chesneau, O., Matsuura, M et al., 2006

  29. CPD-56 dusty core: a compact source 8.7 mm deconvolved image (30% PAHs)

  30. MIDI data on CPD-56°8032 CPD1 B=45.7 m PA = -5° CPD2 B=45.6 m PA = 5° CPD3 B=41.2 m PA = 51° N CPD2 CPD1 Résolution36 mas à 8 µm60 mas à 13.5 µm CPD3

  31. Best geometrical model for CPD-56°8032 ? CPD1 B=45.7 m PA = -5° R = 72 +/- 3 mas(110 +/- 5 UA) N i = 29 +/- 5° CPD2 B=45.6 m PA = 5° E CPD3 B=41.2 m PA = 51° -15 +/- 5° Good model ???

  32. Towards complex models [ Shakura & Sunyaev 1973 ; Wood et al. 2002, Wolf 2005 ] α = 2.0 h(100 UA)=10 UA β = 1.5 500AU 2000 AU

  33. Best model 10 micron image Résolution : 13 mas par pixel SED fit based on carbon chemistry only

  34. High-Resolution view of CPD-568032 10 mm image 8.7 mm image (30% PAHs) Chesneau, O., Collioud, A., de Marco, O., et al., 2006, submitted

  35. The connection between PNs/SNIa and symbiotic systems: recurrent novae RS Oph is in outburst since the 13th of Feb. 2006 Last outburst: January 1985! Estimated distance: 600pc (1.5-2.3kpc…) DDT proposal (O. Chesneau, C. Hummel, F. Millour, M. Vannier): AMBER data taken the 18th of Feb.

  36. First data Typical sizes: continuum 3.5-4.5mas, Brg 6.5-9 mas (overresolved) Dynamics in Brg, complex… Object centro-symmetric in continuum (fireball)

  37. Other objects: QX Pup (OH231.8+4.2) NACO 2.12 HST optical HST Nicmos NACO L’ band Matsuura, M, Chesneau, O., Zijlstra, A et al., 2006, in preparation

  38. MIDI spectrum MIDI correlated flux Typical extensions: (Gaussian model)

  39. Actual situation: . Papers are based on 2-6 visibility measurements only, . UT time pressure, . ATs commissioning in progress, . Limiting magnitude problems (no fringe tracker…) . Interesting science only with a coupling with classical techniques (polarimetry, spectroscopy, radio imaging…) . The progress will be slow: . The VLTI is now almost crystallized, . We have to ‘learn and understand’ the VLTI . Give access to broad community, Success: Only interferometer worldwide offered in Open Time! . Pionnier in extragalactic studies, mid-IR regime and high spectral resolution,

More Related