1 / 17

Graph-based Recommendation on Social Networks (IEEE2010 International Asia-Pacific Web Conference)

Graph-based Recommendation on Social Networks (IEEE2010 International Asia-Pacific Web Conference). School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science Peking University Beijing, P.R. China Ziqi Wang, Yuwei Tan, Ming Zhang. Recommender Algorithm. Content-based recommendation

Download Presentation

Graph-based Recommendation on Social Networks (IEEE2010 International Asia-Pacific Web Conference)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Graph-based Recommendation on Social Networks(IEEE2010 International Asia-Pacific Web Conference) School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science Peking University Beijing, P.R. China Ziqi Wang, Yuwei Tan, Ming Zhang

  2. Recommender Algorithm • Content-based recommendation • Recommends resources based on their content and not on user’s rating and opinion. • Collaborative filtering • It’s based on the assumption that similar users express similar interests on similar resources. • Graph based recommendation • User transitive associations between users and resources in the bipartite user-resource graph.

  3. Random Walk with Restarts(RWR) How closely related are two nodes in a graph? a = in every step there is a probability q = is a column vector of zeros with the element corresponding to the starting node set to 1 S = is the transition probability matrix and its element P(t) = denotes the probability that the random walk at step t

  4. 10 9 12 2 8 1 11 3 4 6 5 7 Random Walk with Restarts(RWR)

  5. 0.03 0.04 10 9 0.10 12 2 0.08 0.02 0.13 8 1 0.13 11 3 0.04 4 0.05 6 5 0.13 7 0.05 Random Walk with Restarts(RWR) Nearby nodes, higher scores Ranking vector More red, more relevant

  6. Tag-based Promotion Algorithms

  7. Tag-based Promotion Algorithms • Treating tagging behavior directly as another form of rating. • Assigning the minimum value of user rating to be the weight of each new edge • Assigning the maximum value of user rating to be the weight of each new edge • Assigning the average rating of the corresponding user to be the weight of the new edge • Choose the best one in the experiment.

  8. Tag-based Promotion Algorithms

  9. Tag-based Promotion Algorithms to describe the interest of user ti(k) = is the kth tag made by user ui. ci(k) = the frequency of tag ti(k)

  10. Tag-based Promotion Algorithms • Measuring the user’s similarity based on their tagging information. ni = is the number of tags user ui assigned. ci(k) = the frequency of tag ti(k)

  11. Tag-based Promotion Algorithms • The weight of the edge should be proportional to the similarity. k = is a parameter that we will test it in the experiment.

  12. Evaluation Protocol TS = stands for test set U = stands for users set RelevantNum = the number of relevant resources in the results RecommendLength = the number of resources that are recommended to a user

  13. Two information retrieval metrics • P@k = Precision at rank K • The proportion of resources ranked in the top K results. • S@k = Success at rank K • The probability of finding a good resource among the top K results.

  14. Experiment Method 1 = Assigning the minimum value Method 2 = Assigning the maximum value Method 3 = Assigning the average rating

  15. Experiment

  16. Experiment

  17. Conclusions and Future work • Conclusions • Two algorithms based on the framework of Random Walk with Restarts. • This proves that our promotion algorithm performs better on sparse data sets. • Future work • Focus on recommendation on large scale data with better performance and lower time cost.

More Related