190 likes | 334 Views
Building blocks for RDA. Theory behind RDA ALLUNY Annual Meeting September 28-30, 2012. RDA. Resource Development Access is the new cataloging code. RDA is replacing current code - AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, 2 nd edition). RDA to be implemented March 31, 2013 .
E N D
Building blocks for RDA Theory behind RDA ALLUNY Annual Meeting September 28-30, 2012
RDA • Resource Development Access is the new cataloging code. • RDA is replacing current code - AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, 2nd edition). • RDA to be implemented March 31, 2013. • RDA designed using FRBR as its foundation.
RDAConceptual ModelsUnderlying RDA “A key element in the design of RDA is its alignment with the conceptual models for bibliographic and authority data developed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA)….” 0.3.1
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records FRBR (“Furbur”) is the theory behind RDA FRBR is a way to think about what things our libraries, museums and archives collect. FRBR’s goal is to improve cataloging, cataloging records and the online public catalog.
FRBR • Conceptual model • Code & system neutral • Entity-attribute- relationship model • Aids in understanding • Meeting users needs.
FRBR’s philosophy meeting users needs. User’s Tasks as defined by FRBR • FIND • IDENTIFY • SELECT • OBTAIN
FRBR’s objectives • To create a framework • To recommend a basic level of functionality (FRBR 2.1)
Entity Relationship Model Maps out the relationship between the information contained in a bibliographic record and the needs of those who use the data. User Bibliographic Record User
FRBR concepts • Entities • things • Attributes • properties • Relationships • interactions
FRBR concepts • Entities • things • Attributes • properties • Relationships • interactions
FRBR entities Group 1 : intellectual or artistic products Group 2 : those responsible for the content Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) -2009 Group 3 : subjects of works Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD)- 2010
Intellectual ProductsWork – Expression – Manifestation - Item work Expression is realized through Manifestation is embodied in Item 1 arrow = one 2 arrows = many is exemplified
WORK work is realized through
Expression work Expression is realized through is embodied in
Manifestation work Expression is realized through Manifestation is embodied in is exemplified
Item work Expression is realized through Manifestation is embodied in Item is exemplified
Intellectual ProductsWork – Expression – Manifestation - Item work Expression is realized through Manifestation is embodied in Item 1 arrow = one 2 arrows = many is exemplified
RDA Table of Contents • Section 1: Recording Attributes of Manifestation & Item • Section 2: Recording Attributes of Work & Expression • Section 3: Recording Attributes of Person, Family & Corporate Body • Section 4: Recording Attributes of Concept, Object, Event & Place • Section 5 Recording Primary Relationships Between Work, Expression, Manifestation, & Item • Section 6: Recording Relationships to Person, Families & Corporate Bodies • Section 7: Recording Relationships to Concepts, Objects, Events & Places • Section 8: Recording Relationships between Works, Expressions, Manifestation, & Items • Section 9: Recording Relationships Between Persons, Families, & Corporate Bodies • Section 10: Recording Relationships between Concepts, Objects. Events & Places
Thank you!http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdfFunctional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final ReportTake the Library of Congress FBRB quiz– if you dare!http://www.loc.gov/catworkshop/RDA%20training%20materials/LC%20RDA%20Training/Captivate-FRBR%20Quiz%201/FRBR%20Quiz%201-Captivate.htmDonna Movsovichdcmovsov@law.syr.edu