1 / 23

Mental Health Made Simple ?

Learn about the Diagnosis Wheel, DSM-IV-TR, Weschler Intelligence Scales, MMPI, MCMI, and CPI for accurate mental health assessments. Discover how tools like Rorschach & TAT reveal personality traits & disorders.⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

normandoyle
Download Presentation

Mental Health Made Simple ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mental HealthMade Simple ? Simple Factoids From Doc Ty

  2. Why? • 1993 Those with Severe Mental Illness discharged to the street by government • 60-85% have mental health issues • Misunderstood, stigmatized, ignored • Interesting Fact: The Human Brain can rewire past damaged areas

  3. Diagnosis Wheel(Gathering the Story)

  4. Diagnosis Flow • Syndromes are ID • Wide Range of diagnosis are created • One is chosen to move forward on • Comorbid diagnoses and arrange in order of importance • Check up with a formulation • Reevaluate as new data emerges

  5. DSM-IV-TR • The Diagnostic Statistical Manual Fourth Edition, Text Revision produced by the American Psychiatric Association • DSM-V due 2013 • 1 of 2 International Benchmarks for Diagnosis

  6. Assessments FYI • Clinicians use codified assessment tools • Behavioural • Weschler Intelligence Scales • Weschler Memory Scales • Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) • Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory • California Psychological Inventory • Rorschach • Thematic Apperception Test • Neuropsychological Impairment

  7. Behavioural • Focuses on preceding events/resulting consequences as an understanding factor. • Typical includes: measures of behaviour (overt/covert); antecedents (internal/external); conditions surrounding behaviour; and consequences • Validity: Challenging because of a moving matrix dependent on clinician or team, need definitions to truly understand results.

  8. Weschler Intelligence Scales • Provides 3 IQ: Full scale; Verbal; Performance • Main thrust: Accuracy in predicting future behaviour, long-term predictions however fall short. • Bias towards logical thought patterns; middle to upper-class Caucasian demographics. • Norms may not be applicable to other cultures; lower socio-economic stratas; Enormity of calculations lends to higher end false results due to clinician error.

  9. Weschler Memory Scales • Core component of any thought cognitive assessment. • Diagnosis of: depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, head injuries, stroke, learning disabilities, and neurotoxic exposure stipulate memory complaints. • Administration time is upwards to 42 mins.

  10. MMPI • Standardized questionnaire • Provides wide range of self-description scores • Quantitative Measure of emotional adjustments and attitude towards test taking. • Areas: General health, occupational interests, preoccupations, morale, phobias, and educational problems. • Moderate levels of stability and internal consistency, high overlap with the different scales, • Bias: Gender, Age, Socio-economics, demographics, race, place of residence, intelligence and education are all variables that if not properly taken into account can skewer results or produce false results. • Used to screen individuals for high stress or sensitive jobs (i.e. air traffic controller) • Primarily Axis I

  11. Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) • Self-report assessment much like MMPI (personality, emotional adjustment and attitude towards test taking), is one of few that focuses on personality disorders. • Current one is 175 items, separated into 28 scales in these categories: Modifying Indices, Clinical Personality Patterns, Severe Personality Pathology, Clinical Syndromes, and severe syndromes. • Driving Theory: Millon believed in polarity (active-passive, self-other, and pleasure-pain) by ranking these can see if the person is typical or non-typical on the personality spectrum. • Individual’s age, gender and ethnicity should be taken into account, and separate scoring norms have been developed to mitigate false results. • Primarily Axis II

  12. California Psychology Inventory (CPI) • Primarily for young adults with society avg. reading level of Gr. 4 • Focused on “Folk Concepts” (culturally relevant), translated into 40 languages. • Focuses on typical population and interpersonal behaviours. • Assess enduring interpersonal personality characteristics in a typical population. • 20 Scales under general domains: • Observable, interpersonal style, & orientation (i.e. Sociability, social presence) • Internal normative orientation & values (i.e. responsibility, self-control) • Aspects of Cognitive intellectual functioning (i.e.achievement via conformance, intellectual efficiency) • Measures of role and personal style (i.e flexibility, psychological-Mindedness)

  13. Rorschach • 10 inkblots given systematically, individual’s responses tracked to uncover the structure of the personality. • 3 General Categories: location (area of inkblot they focused on); determinants (specific properties of blot used in responses); content of response. • Excellent at bypassing an individual’s cognitive inhibitions. • Challenges: Subjective nature, results need to be checked/re-checked,

  14. Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) • Method of revealing dominant drives, emotions, sentiments, complexes and conflicts of personality. • 20 pictures in which individual is asked to make up a story: what is happening, thoughts/feelings of characters, events that led up to picture, outcome of event. • 2 sessions, given sequence of cards, upwards 2 hrs to administer, • Qualitative not quantitative analysis • Up to Clinician Intuitive Clinical Judgment does not allow for universal standards, those who like say works well, those who detract says does not work. • Best results when apart of a battery of tests • Requires for best results a specialized/trained administrator

  15. Neuropsychological Impairment • A battery of tests • Individual presents outside of test parameters can create a false negative (or positive) • Types: • Visuocontructive Abilities • Mental Activity • Memory and Learning • Verbal Functions and Academic Skills • Motor Performance • Executive Functions • Emotional Status • P.518 (Table 12.1)

  16. Clinical Disorders Axis I • Other Conditions that May be a Focus of Clinical Attention

  17. Axis II • Personality Disorders • Mental Retardation

  18. Axis III • General Medical Conditions (ICD-9-CM coded)-medical conditions that may cause Mental Disorders. • Infectious/Parasitic (001-139) • Neoplasm (140-239) • Endocrine, nutritional, & Metabolic, Immunity (240-279) • blood & blood forming organs (320-389) • Circulatory system (390-459) • Respiratory (460-519) • Digestive Systems (520-579) • Genitourinary System (580-629) • Complications in pregnancy, childbirth, and the pueperium (630-676) • Skin and subcutaneous tissue (680-709) • Musculoskeletal System and connective tissue (710-739) • Congenital Anomalies (740-759) • Certain conditions originating in Perinatal Period (760-779) • Symptoms, Signs, and Ill defined Conditions (780-799) • Injury and Poisoning (800-999)

  19. Axis IV Psychosocial/ Environmental Problems -Used to report factors that may affect diagnosis for Axis I/II Problems with: • Primary Support Group (Family. e.g.: death, health issues; abuse) • Related to Social Environment (e.g.: racism, retirement, death of friend) • Educational (e.g.: school environment, literacy) • Occupational (e.g.: un/underemployed; stressful work schedule) • Housing (e.g.: homelessness; safety) • Economic (e.g.: insufficient governmental supports; insufficient Income) • Access to health services (e.g.: inadequate, transportation, insurance) • Legal (e.g.: judicial involvement – perpetrator or victim) • Other (e.g.: disasters; war; famine; hostility; discord with professional supports; lack of governmental supports).

  20. Axis V Global Assessment of Functioning Can they Function in Society? • The G.A.F. scale is a rating scale of 0 to 100 that is used over the time span an individual is receiving treatment to determine functionality. • Functioning impeded by physical or environmental limitations is not assessed. • These are averaged for the Axis V total and in brackets it is stated when score was e.g. (current), (at discharge) (highest level past year).

  21. Example of DSM-IV Multiaxial Evaluation form Example 1: (p.35 DSM-IV-TR) Axis I: 296.23 Major Depressive Disorder, Single episode, Severe without Psychotic Features 305.00 Alcohol Abuse Axis II: 301.6 Dependent Personality Disorder Frequent use of denial Axis III: None Axis IV: Threat of Job Loss Axis V: GAF = 35 (current)

  22. Psychopharmacology • Work with a Pharmacist and consistent Pharmacy.

  23. Questions • Any questions? • Any Comments?

More Related