1 / 22

Global Survey Findings on Research Information Management Practices

This collection of survey findings explores various aspects of Research Information Management (RIM) practices, including the number of survey respondents, hosting locations of RIM systems, reasons for pursuing RIM activities, importance of RIM functions, incentives for researchers, primary stakeholders, library involvement, and institutional activities to support RIM adoption.

normantwilliams
Download Presentation

Global Survey Findings on Research Information Management Practices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “Total number of survey respondents, by broad region” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  2. “Live RIM systems in use, by selected regions” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  3. “Hosting location of current live RIM system, per system used” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  4. “Institutions reporting having migrated from previous live RIM system” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  5. “Importance of reasons for pursuing RIM activities for institutions with a live RIM system (n=222)” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  6. “Importance of reasons for pursuing RIM activities for institutions implementing RIM systems (n=51)” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  7. “Functions of RIM considered important by institutions with a live RIM system, ranked by percentage of institutions considering a function ‘extremely important.’” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  8. “Functions of RIM considered important by institutions implementing RIM systems, ranked by percentage of institutions considering a function ‘extremely important.’” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  9. “Incentives for researchers considered important by institutions with a live RIM system, ranked by percentage of institutions considering an incentive ‘Very important.’” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  10. “Institutions with a live RIM platform reporting that their RIM system serves as their default institutional repository/ETD repository/research data repository” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  11. “Institutions with a live RIM system reporting that their RIM system serves as their default institutional repository/ETD repository/research data repository, with regional subdivisions” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  12. “Primary stakeholders based on total number of mentions across all responses for all areas of activity, in aggregate. Note that multiple primary stakeholders could be selected per area of activity” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  13. “Relative importance of different stakeholders listed as “primary,” organized by importance of the library, by selected countries and for all implementation stages” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  14. “RIM activities for which the library plays a primary or supporting role, aggregated for institutions with a live RIM” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  15. “Library units supporting RIM activities at institutions with a live RIM system” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  16. “Important library goals in supporting RIM activities, at institutions with a live RIM system” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  17. “Number of library staff supporting RIM activities full- or part-time, for institutions with a live RIM system” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  18. “Number of non-library staff supporting RIM activities full- or part-time, for institutions with a live RIM system” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  19. “Institutional activities to support RIM adoption at institutions with a live RIM system” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  20. “RIM metrics collected by institutions with a live RIM system” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  21. “Institutional efforts to measure RIM impact at institutions with live RIM implementations” by OCLC and euroCRIS, Practices and Patterns in Research Information Management: Findings from a Global Survey (DOI:10.25333/BGFG-D241),CC BY 4.0

  22. “Key roles for libraries in research information management” from “Research Information Management : Defining RIM and the Library’s Role” (DOI:110.25333/C3NK88),CC BY 4.0

More Related