190 likes | 446 Views
Heat Exchanger Design Project Department of Mechanical Engineering ME 414 Thermal / Fluid System Design Final Project December 13, 2005 Group Members: David Langenderfer Rishi Govalakrishnan Dan Langenderfer Vincent Liaw Professor: Mr. John Toksoy. Problem Statement.
E N D
Heat Exchanger Design ProjectDepartment of Mechanical EngineeringME 414 Thermal / Fluid System DesignFinal ProjectDecember 13, 2005Group Members:David LangenderferRishi GovalakrishnanDan LangenderferVincent LiawProfessor: Mr. John Toksoy Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
Problem Statement • Design a heat exchanger flowing a chemical at 80,000 kg/hr to drop the fluid temperature from 35°C to 25°C • Cooling chemical is city water flowing at 20°C • The shell may not exceed 2 meters in diameter and 7 meters in length • Weight, pressure drop, and cost should be minimized Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
Assumptions • Process and cooling fluid have minimal corrosive properties • Properties of fluid are similar to water • Counter flow to improve effectiveness • Tube pitch set at 90 degrees • Pitch ratio of 1.25 (rule of thumb) • Shell side mass velocity set to 140,000 kg/hr Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
Matlab Implementation • Initially used to determine possible dimensions of an acceptable heat exchanger • Output from Matlab was inputted into Minitab for optimization • Compared results from Matlab output and Minitab optimization Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
Funneling Effect Tube OD, Shell ID, Length, Number of Passes, Tube Material, Baffles, Baffle Spacing 7 Factors 3 Factors Tube OD, Shell ID, Length Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
Optimization • Obtained results with 7 parameters from Matlab • Using DOE Factorial Response in Minitab we reduced the parameters by utilizing Main Effects plots Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
Determining Effects on Heat Exchanger • Key variables for an effective heat exchanger • Tube OD • Shell ID • Tube Length Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
Decisions from Main Effects • Two pass on tube side: • Minimal foot print on shop floor • Minimize leak points • Increases pressure drop • Allows for independent expansion of tubes and shell1 Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
Decisions Cont’d • Counter flow is desirable for a two tube pass exchanger to increase effective temperature difference1 • Aluminum minimized weight with no effect on heat transfer • No baffles due to large increase in pressure drop on shell side Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
Optimization Plots Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
Results • Tube OD: 0.0095 m • Shell ID: 0.3874 m • Length: 3.0 m • Tube velocity: 1.54 m/s (Range 0.9 - 2.4 m/s) • Turbulent flow promoting high heat exchange on shell and tube • Heat transfer is 6% over desired heat transfer to accommodate for future fouling Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
Results (cont’d) • ΔP Shell: 2,513 Pa ( 0.365 PSI) • ΔP Tube: 38,450 Pa (5.577 PSI) • Weight: 496 kg (1094 lbs) • Number of Tubes: 750 Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
Lessons Learned • Optimization using interaction between Minitab and Matlab • How to work as a team • Lots of decisions to make when given an open ended question • Many solutions to a simple problem • Finish projects early (12/4/2005) Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
References • Heat Exchangers Selection, Rating, and Thermal Design Kakaç and Liu CRC Press, 2nd Edition, 2002 • ME 414 Lecture Notes Professor John Toksoy, 2005 Purdue School of Engineering and Technology
Questions Purdue School of Engineering and Technology