1 / 17

Te Reo Māori Qualifications Review Stakeholder Hui Tāmaki-makau-rau 30 Mahuru 2013

Te Reo Māori Qualifications Review Stakeholder Hui Tāmaki-makau-rau 30 Mahuru 2013. Targeted Review of Qualifications (TRoQ) MM EQA Qualifications involved in Te Reo Māori Review Review Structure Discussion - He aha ngā hiahia me ngā wawata? Moving Forwards. Overview of the day.

nseeley
Download Presentation

Te Reo Māori Qualifications Review Stakeholder Hui Tāmaki-makau-rau 30 Mahuru 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Te Reo MāoriQualifications ReviewStakeholder HuiTāmaki-makau-rau30 Mahuru 2013

  2. Targeted Review of Qualifications (TRoQ) MM EQA Qualifications involved in Te Reo Māori Review Review Structure Discussion - He aha ngā hiahia me ngā wawata? Moving Forwards Overview of the day

  3. Targeted Review of Qualifications (TRoQ)- a brief

  4. Targeted Review of Qualifications (TRoQ) Aim is to significantly reduce the number of qualifications on the New Zealand Qualifications Frame work (NZQF); and to ensure they are useful and relevant Focus is on certificates and diplomas at Levels 1-6 (NCEA and university qualifications are excluded) Intended to simplify the qualifications system; and reduce duplication and proliferation of qualifications

  5. Under TRoQ: Qualifications and programmes are separated All qualifications are in the public domain SSBs and education providers are compulsory stakeholders in each other’s qualification development Have a single set of flexible qualification design rules

  6. Qualification design rules • Statement of strategic purpose • use, relevance, point of difference • Outcome statement • graduate profiles skills, knowledge, application (what a graduate can know/ be/ do) • education, employment, community pathways • Specification • requirements and guidance for programme developers eg. entry requirements/pre-requisites; credit transfer; RPL, APL, RCC arrangements; consistency of outcomes

  7. Separation of the qualification from the programme

  8. MM EQA – Te Hono o Te Kahurangi • Principles based framework • Mātauranga Māori and EQA side by side • Valued outcomes for ākonga and whānau, hapū, iwi, hapori whānui • Advancing Mātauranga Māori

  9. Ngā Whāinga Key concepts Key things to be aware of when answering ngā pātai tuākana “What good might look and feel like” Mātauranga Māori and general educational context Ngā Pātai Tuākana / Pātai Teina Key evaluation / enquiry questions Focus on quality and value of relevant outcomes and key contributing processes “What matters most in meeting needs and aspirations?” Ngā Paearu Performance criteria rubrics Distinguishing between levels of quality and performance How much good is really “good” Ngā Taputapu Arotakenga – The Tools

  10. Pre-work Gather information to determine sector workforce needs and skills Stakeholder Profile (who are the key stakeholders?) Determine governance and working structures Review phase 1 Prepare and confirm a revised map or ‘suite of qualifications’ Prepare new qualifications for pre-approval – to be “good enough” Report on learning and the “story” of the decisions made to NZQA Review phase 2 Complete qualification development What happens in a review?

  11. All stakeholders with an interest in the outcome of these qualifications are encouraged to participate in the review. … to ensure the qualifications meet the requirements of their workforce, industry and/or communities. Your attendance indicates you understand that importance. And, we will continue to communicate progress to all MM providers and key stakeholders. Mandatory Review of Qualifications

  12. Review Structure • Te RōpūKaitaitoko – Reference Group • Te RōpūTātaki – Governance Group Hana O’ReganPania Papa Leon Blake Evelyn Tobin Rawinia Higgins Te KōwhaiŌhia RuakereHondCheWilson Wiremu Doherty • Te RōpūAhu Kaupapa – Working Group(s) • Consultative Body – ALL stakeholders

  13. Te RōpūTātaki– Governance Group Provides strategic direction, guidance and project overview of the review process. It is a forum for decision making. Ensures that the suite of qualifications are based on current and future needs of iwi, hapū, hapori and stakeholders. Te RōpūAhu Kaupapa – Working Group(s) Provide technical input in the qualification development Develop the qualifications based on the needs and feedback from stakeholders Communicate widely to all stakeholders Roles and Responsibilities

  14. What futures should REO MĀORI QUALS offer the learner? the provider? NZ society? global engagement? How should the suite of REO MĀORI QUALSbe shaped? (Added value of Māori Studies and Customs/ Tikanga Māori and other qualification pathways?) What is your rationale? WHAT ELSE? Discussion Points & Group Activity

  15. Moving Forwards • Review Timeframes • Future Meetings • Stakeholder feedback and participation • Engagement • Suggestions • Questions • http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/about-us/consultations-and-reviews/review-of-te-reo-maori-qualifications/

  16. Te Reo MāoriQualifications ReviewStakeholder HuiTe Wānanga O AotearoaManukau Campus30 September 2013

More Related