550 likes | 676 Views
Falls Analysis Mirrored Indicators with no fall recorded as secondary diagnosis for patients aged 50 years and over Final v1.0. Falls Analyses. Contents: F1.1.1(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture, by acute trust
E N D
Falls AnalysisMirrored Indicators with no fall recorded as secondary diagnosisfor patients aged 50 years and overFinal v1.0 09 March 2011
Falls Analyses Contents: • F1.1.1(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture, by acute trust • F1.1.2(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust • F1.2.1(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, by acute trust • F1.2.2(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, at a population level • F1.2.3(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust • F1.2.4(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by age and sex at a population level
F1.1.1(2) - In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture, by acute trust
F1.1.1(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture, by acute trust Table 1a: Observed number of deaths for for people admitted with fragility fracture (2008/09) Table 1b: Observed number of deaths for for people admitted with fragility fracture (2009/10) Data source: HES 2008/09, 2009/10
F1.1.1(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture, by acute trust Chart 1a: Standardised Mortality Ratio for people admitted with fragility fracture and 95% confidence intervals (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09
6 F1.1.1(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture, by acute trust Chart 1b: Standardised Mortality Ratio for people admitted with fragility fracture and 95% confidence intervals (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10
7 F1.1.1(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture, by acute trust Chart 2a: Funnel plot for SMR of people admitted with fragility fracture with 95% and 99.8% control limits (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09
8 F1.1.1(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture, by acute trust Chart 2b: Funnel plot for SMR of people admitted with fragility fracture with 95% and 99.8% control limits (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10
F1.1.2(2) - In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust
10 F1.1.2(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust Table 1a: Observed number of deaths for people admitted with fragility fracture of the proximal femur (2008/09) Table 1b: Observed number of deaths for people admitted with fragility fracture of the proximal femur (2009/10) Data source: HES 2008/09, 2009/10
11 F1.1.2(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust Chart 1a: Standardised Mortality Ratio for people admitted with fragility fracture of the proximal femur and 95% confidence intervals (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09
12 F1.1.2(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust Chart 1b: Standardised Mortality Ratio for people admitted with fragility fracture of the proximal femur and 95% confidence intervals (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10
13 F1.1.2(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust Chart 2a: Funnel plot for SMR of people admitted with fragility fracture of the proximal femur showing 95% and 99.8% control limits (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09
14 F1.1.2(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust Chart 2b: Funnel plot for SMR of people admitted with fragility fracture of the proximal femur showing 95% and 99.8% control limits (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10
F1.2.1(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, by acute trust
16 F1.2.1(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, by acute trust Table 1a: Observed number of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture (2008/09) Table 1b: Observed number of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture (2009/10) Data source: HES 2008/09, 2009/10
17 F1.2.1(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, by acute trust Table 1a: Indirectly Standardised Ratio of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture (2008/09) Table 1b: Indirectly Standardised Ratio of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture (2009/10) Data source: HES 2008/09, 2009/10
18 F1.2.1(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, by acute trust Chart 1a: Indirectly Standardised Ratio of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture and 95% confidence intervals (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09
19 F1.2.1(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, by acute trust Chart 1a: Indirectly Standardised Ratio of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture and 95% confidence intervals (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10
20 F1.2.1(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, by acute trust Chart 1a: Funnel plot for secondary care admissions with fragility fracture with 95% and 99.8% control limits (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09
21 F1.2.1(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, by acute trust Chart 1b: Funnel plot for secondary care admissions with fragility fracture with 95% and 99.8% control limits (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10
F1.2.2(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, at a population level
23 F1.2.2(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, at a population level Table 1a: Observed number of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09
24 F1.2.2(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, at a population level Table 1b: Observed number of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10
25 F1.2.2(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, at a population level Table 2a Directly Standardised Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture per 100,000 population per year (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09
26 F1.2.2(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, at a population level Table 2b: Directly Standardised Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture per 100,000 population per year (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10
27 F1.2.2(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, at a population level Chart 1a: Directly Standardised Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture per 100,000 population and 95% confidence intervals (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09 and ONS 2008 population estimates
28 F1.2.2(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, at a population level Chart 1b: Directly Standardised Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture per 100,000 population and 95% confidence intervals (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10 and ONS 2009 population estimates
29 F1.2.2(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, at a population level Chart 2: Time Series of Directly Standardised Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture per 100,000 population per year Data source: HES 2008/09 & 2009/10 and ONS 2008 & 2009 population estimates
30 F1.2.2(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture, at a population level Chart 3a: Funnel plot of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture with 95% and 99.8% control limits (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09 and ONS 2008 population estimates
31 F1.2.3(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust Chart 3b: Funnel plot of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture with 95% and 99.8% control limits (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10 and ONS 2009 population estimates
F1.2.3(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust
33 F1.2.3(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust Table 1a: Observed number of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur (2008/09) Table 1b: Observed number of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur (2009/10) Data source: HES 2008/09, 2009/10
34 F1.2.3(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust Table 1a: Indirectly Standardised Ratio of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur (2008/09) Table 1b: Indirectly Standardised Ratio of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur (2009/10) Data source: HES 2008/09, 2009/10
35 F1.2.3(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust Chart 1a: Indirectly Standardised Ratio of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur and 95% confidence intervals (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09
36 F1.2.3(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust Chart 1b: Indirectly Standardised Ratio of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur and 95% confidence intervals (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10
37 F1.2.3(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust Chart 2a: Funnel plot of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur with 95% and 99.8% control limits (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09
38 F1.2.3(2) – Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by acute trust Chart 2b: Funnel plot of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur with 95% and 99.8% control limits (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10
F1.2.4(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by age and sex at a population level
40 F1.2.4(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by age and sex at a population level Table 1a: Observed number of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09
41 F1.2.4(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by age and sex at a population level Table 1b: Observed number of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10
42 F1.2.4(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by age and sex at a population level Table 2a Directly Standardised Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur per 100,000 population per year (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09 and ONS 2008 population estimates
43 F1.2.4(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by age and sex at a population level Table 2a Directly Standardised Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur per 100,000 population per year (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10 and ONS 2009 population estimates
44 F1.2.4(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by age and sex at a population level Chart 1a: Directly Standardised Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur per 100,000 population and 95% confidence intervals (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09 and ONS 2008 population estimates
45 F1.2.4(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by age and sex at a population level Chart 1b: Directly Standardised Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur per 100,000 population and 95% confidence intervals (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10 and ONS 2009 population estimates
46 F1.2.4(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by age and sex at a population level Chart 2: Time Series of Directly Standardised Rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur per 100,000 population per year Data source: HES 2008/09 & 2009/10 and ONS 2008 & 2009 population estimates
47 F1.2.4(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by age and sex at a population level Chart 3a: Funnel plot of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur showing 95% and 99.8% control limits (2008/09) Data source: HES 2008/09 and ONS 2008 population estimates
48 F1.2.4(2) – Standardised rate of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur, by age and sex at a population level Chart 3b: Funnel plot of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture of the proximal femur showing 95% and 99.8% control limits (2009/10) Data source: HES 2009/10 and ONS 2009 population estimates
F1.1.1(2) – In hospital mortality for people admitted with fragility fracture, by acute trust • Data Source: HES data 2008/09, 2009/10 • Data Details: Primary diagnosis recorded as fragility fracture for discharge episode (ICD10 codes: S72.0, S72.1, S72.2, S52, S82, S42, S32) Age at start of discharge episode greater or equal to 50 years old Admitted and discharged within year Discharge method equal to Death • Indicator: Numerator: Number of secondary care admissions with fragility fracture where the patient died in hospital Denominator: All admissions with a primary diagnosis of fragility fracture Presentation: By acute trust • Data Handling Notes: Indirectly standardised rate based on sex and age (5 year age bands from 50 to 89, and 90 and over)