1 / 38

15/09/2008

Performance Appraisal with Performance Agreement. Professor Dr. Prasit Watanapa Mahidol University. 15/09/2008. Topic covers:. Objective of Performance Appraisal Course of MU Performance Appraisal What is Performance Agreement? What are its benefits? Procedure of Performance Agreement

nuwa
Download Presentation

15/09/2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Performance Appraisal withPerformance Agreement Professor Dr. Prasit Watanapa Mahidol University 15/09/2008

  2. Topic covers: • Objective of Performance Appraisal • Course of MU Performance Appraisal • What is Performance Agreement?What are its benefits? • Procedure ofPerformance Agreement • KPIs and KPI Collection • Competency and Appraisal • Action Plan : Office of the President P Watanapa

  3. Objective of Performance Appraisal • To encourage MU faculty members to perform their duties in accordance with their organisation’s vision and mission • To make the payment more appropriate and fair for the faculty members • To use results of the appraisal to plan for the HR management • To search for appropriate members to a process ofSuccession Plan P Watanapa

  4. Course of Performance Appraisal • To apply the performance appraisal with advance agreement between an assessor and evaluated person, calledPerformance Agreement, and use the principle of knowledge management as the guideline for making the agreement • This appraisal covers assessment of performance enhancement, potentials, properties, and competency P Watanapa

  5. Good Performance Appraisal • Be just and acceptable for assessor, evaluated members and organisation • Increaseperformance enhancement • Relating to the vision/mission of the organisation to accomplish the goal • Have clear KPIs that can be compared to different periods for development of the individuals and organisation P Watanapa

  6. What is Performance Agreement? • The system of performance appraisal that helps to accomplish the organisation’s vision and mission • The appraisal system that is based on an advance agreement made by an assessor and evaluated member on activities, KPIs and requirements • The appraisal system that matches up withjob description of that position and the organisation’s mission P Watanapa

  7. Performance Agreement Mission Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Job DescriptionTask 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7 Activity 1 Activity 2 Activity 3 Activity 4 Activity 5 P Watanapa

  8. Advantages of Performance Agreement • Administrators or heads can review work performance of their subordinates and make division of labour to increase effectiveness of the staff and organisation in order to follow the mission. • Making an advance agreement that is acknowledged by all parties before actual performance appraisal brings about mutual approval and fairness within the organisation. P Watanapa

  9. Performance Agreement • Administrators or heads can apply the advance agreement to plan for HR development and create new jobs as well as increase job quality. • If any subordinate hasa dual position, the advance agreement will help him/her aptly divide times for the tasks and make the appraisal more accurate. P Watanapa

  10. Performance Agreement • Indirect Advantages: • Create an opportunity of communications between supervisors and subordinates • Assess heads on leadership when they are assigned to make the agreement with their subordinates P Watanapa

  11. Procedure of Performance Agreement • • Assessors and evaluated individuals make the • agreement together before the appraisal begins. • When the performance appraisal finishes, assessors inform evaluated staff of the results and plan together for development according to recommendations. • Assessors and evaluated individuals make a new advance agreement on performance appraisal for the next year. P Watanapa

  12. Performance Agreement Assessor Performance Agreement Evaluated Staff Procedure of Performance Appraisal Assessor Acknowledgement of the result together Plan for staff development Make a new agreement for next year Evaluated Staff P Watanapa

  13. 1 4 2 1 3 5 11 mo. 2 mo. 5 mo. 1 mo. 3 mo. 1 2 3 4 5 From the Faculty To HR Department 1.5 mo. 3 mo. 1 mo. 2 mo. 7.5 mo. P Watanapa

  14. 4 1 1 2 3 5 11 mo. 2 mo. 5 mo. 1 mo. 3 mo. 1 2 3 4 5 The First Round= 8.5 months From the Faculty To HR Department 1.5 mo. 3 mo. 1 mo. 3 mo. 8.5 mo. P Watanapa

  15. Agreement Agreement Mahidol University Council, President President, Deans Vice Presidents, Associate Deans Directors, Heads of Departments HR Department Agreement P Watanapa

  16. Agreement Agreement Agreement Mahidol University Council Job Appraisal President Deans Heads of Faculty Departments Faculty Members Agreement P Watanapa

  17. KPIs and KPI Collection When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind William Thompson (Lord Kelvin), 1824-1907 P Watanapa

  18. Characteristics of KPI - Specific - Measurable - Achievable - Realistic - Timely S M A R T P Watanapa

  19. Types of KPI Quantity Quality Time Cost Customer Satisfaction P Watanapa

  20. Customers’ Preferences R eliability – Get what they want A ssurance – Confident and credible T angibles – Touchable and seeable E mpathy -Attentive R esponsiveness – Be promptly served P Watanapa

  21. Major KPIs • KPIs that indicate Key Performance (Output-Outcome, Process) • KPIs that areDanger Indicators • Danger Indicators areindicators that do not indicateKeyPerformance but can cause a serious problem if there is a mistake in operation. • KPIs that indicate = Torr P Watanapa

  22. Value of KPIs Value of KPIscan be shown in forms of Percentage Proportion Rate Ratio Number Average or Mean P Watanapa P Watanapa

  23. KPI Collection • Choose KPIs that are convenient to collect and quite accurate • Use IT system in collecting KPIs • Consistently collect KPIs and periodically evaluate them to make recommendations • Use sampling if there are numerous KPIs • Assign staff responsible for KPI collection P Watanapa

  24. Example of KPIs for Performance Appraisal of General Administrative Staff P Watanapa

  25. Example of KPIs for Performance Appraisal of General Administrative Staff Typing – Quality KPI P Watanapa

  26. Example of KPIs for Performance Appraisal of General Administrative Staff Typing – Time KPI P Watanapa

  27. Example of KPIs for Performance Appraisal of the Appraisal Teamwork P Watanapa

  28. Example of KPIs for Performance Appraisal of General Administrative Staff Request for Position of Expertise/Special Expertise – Time KPI P Watanapa

  29. Example of KPIs for Performance Appraisal of General Administrative Staff Request for Position of Expertise/Special Expertise – Worthiness KPI P Watanapa

  30. Example of KPIs for Performance Appraisal of Clerk P Watanapa

  31. Competency and Appraisal • Definition • Characters or attributes of an individual that reflecthis/her knowledge, skills, attitude, belief, and trait • Group ofknowledge, skills and attributes of an individual that can be seen from his/her work behaviour (measurable or noticeable) P Watanapa

  32. Analysis for Competency Defining Competency Fixing Level of Expectation Setting Method of Assessment Assessing Current Competency Making Conclusion and Application Process ofCompetency SpecifyingCore/Managerial/Functional Competency of the Organisation and Positions Assessment on Competency of Staff in the Organisation P Watanapa

  33. MakingCompetency-based HRM • Determine competency of the organisation (Core Competency) • Define each competency and use all the same in the university • Specify a number of levels of each competency and use all the same in the university • Define each level of competency and use all the same in the university • Set an appropriate level or expectation of each position • Use all abovementioned in HR management P Watanapa

  34. Definition and Level of Expectation Leadership : 5 Levels P Watanapa

  35. Definition and Level of Expectation Leadership : 5 Levels P Watanapa

  36. Definition and Level of Expectation Leadership : 5 Levels P Watanapa

  37. Define Level of Expectation Leadership : 5 Levels P Watanapa

  38. Operation Plan: Office of the President P Watanapa

More Related