1 / 17

Proposed Changes to the Oil & Gas Air Pollution General Permit

Michael Hopkins, P.E., Assistant Chief, DAPC 614-644-3611, Mike.Hopkins@epa.state.oh.us. Proposed Changes to the Oil & Gas Air Pollution General Permit. Topics. Revisions to Oil & Gas GP Revisions to the Unpaved Roadways GP Proposed PBR Timing issues Aggregation Other issues. 2.

nyla
Download Presentation

Proposed Changes to the Oil & Gas Air Pollution General Permit

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Michael Hopkins, P.E., Assistant Chief, DAPC 614-644-3611, Mike.Hopkins@epa.state.oh.us Proposed Changes to the Oil & Gas Air Pollution General Permit

  2. Topics • Revisions to Oil & Gas GP • Revisions to the Unpaved Roadways GP • Proposed PBR • Timing issues • Aggregation • Other issues 2

  3. What is being revised in the Oil & Gas GP? • Incorporate NSPS OOOO into the GP • Add a second Oil & Gas GP to enhance flexibility • Second GP = First GP except: • Flare size changed from 10 mmBtu to 32 mmBtu • NG engines maximum total HP changed from 1,800 HP to 1,000 HP • Same well-site emissions • Simplify the Qualifying Criteria 3

  4. What is being revised in the Unpaved Roadways GP? • Eliminate the need to do daily roadway inspections (for fugitive dust) on days that the roadway is not used. • Eliminates unnecessary inspections • Propose to change both the Title V and the Non Title V versions of the unpaved roadway GPs (GP 5.1 and GP 5.2) 4

  5. What is the Proposed PBR for? • Our current GP does not cover flowback operations • NSPS OOO now covers flowback • The PBR is designed to cover the NSPS flowback operations • Proposed to have Ohio EPA be the primary entity to regulate NSPS flowback requirements instead of U.S. EPA 5

  6. What is the Proposed PBR for? • Means all of the NSPS regulated by Ohio EPA • Means all of the NSPS reports go to Ohio EPA • U.S. EPA retains overall enforcement authority but Ohio EPA becomes the primary enforcement authority 6

  7. What Requirements are in the PBR? • Qualifying criteria • PBR adds tons/yr limits for flowback for BAT • PBR references NSPS sections • Require for each well? - still undecided 7

  8. What is the PBR process? • Review qualifying criteria • Review language of “permit” within rule • Submit application – coverage begins • Find approval on web page • http://epa.ohio.gov/dapc/pbr/permitbyrule.aspx 8

  9. What alternative is there to a PBR? • Incorporate flowback into GP • Simpler approach but: • Need GP before flowback • Does this work? 9

  10. What is in the interested party package? • Cover letter w/ common questions and answers • Draft Qualifying Criteria for both Oil & Gas GPs • Draft Model General Permit terms for the two oil & gas GPs • Proposed changes to the Roadway GP • Draft rule language for the flowback PBR 10

  11. Where do I get Copies? • Ohio EPA Oil & Gas GP web page • http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/genpermit/genpermits.aspx • Ohio EPA Oil & Gas PBR web page • http://epa.ohio.gov/dapc/pbr/permitbyrule.aspx 11

  12. Timing Issues • Comments are due by March 22nd • Cheryl Suttman at: Ohio EPA Division of Air Pollution Control, 50 West Town Street, Suite 700, Columbus, OH 43215 or via e-mail: cheryl.suttman@epa.state.oh.us; or phone: 614-644-3617 • Ohio EPA will review comments • GPs might be available by the end of April • PBR will take about a year - rule process 12

  13. Aggregation Issues • Summit Petroleum 6th Circuit decision applies in Ohio • Applies when deciding on major source status for NSR or Title V • Court said that if two properties are not next to each other, then not adjacent and can’t be part of the same stationary source 13

  14. Aggregation Issues • U.S. EPA says Summit Petroleum decision applies in 6th Circuit states like Ohio • Ohio will follow this decision • Typically means most well sites are not to be grouped with each other because they are not adjacent • Still case-by-case analysis • We will need property lines/owners 14

  15. Flowback Reports • New NSPS flowback report submittal procedure • Need to send reports to U.S. EPA and Ohio EPA • Flowback reports to Ohio EPA can now go to a new e-mail address • OEPA_subpartOOOO_reports@epa.state.oh.us • No physical flowback reports are needed for Ohio EPA 15

  16. Other Issues • Inventory folks working with MARAMA Oil and Gas Workgroup • At some point, will need to develop a good emissions inventory – we are just starting that process • Make sure you have your GP prior to production 16

  17. Wrap-up • Information Locations: • Answer Place • http://ohioepa.custhelp.com/app/home • Ohio EPA Web • http://epa.ohio.gov/ • District Offices/Local Air Agencies • http://epa.ohio.gov/dapc/general/dolaa.aspx • Questions? 17

More Related