90 likes | 210 Views
Cohort analysis of student drop-out – the class of 2010. Project overview. Literature review: Poor school background Poor preparation for Higher E d Etc. Stats and prelim data analysis (Dalia).
E N D
Cohort analysis of student drop-out – the class of 2010 Project overview • Literature review: • Poor school background • Poor preparation for Higher EdEtc. • Stats and prelim data analysis • (Dalia) • Conceptual framework for the studyShaping (lens for) a fine grained analysis within a bounded system • What about the numbers – drop out across the years of study(Busi)/Michael • Institution support provided by the Academic Development co-ordinators(Daisy) • Tracer study of students that had dropped out from UKZN • (Sadhana)/Temesgen • Students’ concerns about institutional issues that led to their drop-out • AD co-ordinators’ concerns about institutional issues that leads to student drop-out • Students’ personal reasons for drop-out • Academic development co-ordinators’ perspective on academic support So where is the problem?
Drop out analysis from HEIs in South Africa (from literature) • Status: • progression and retention rates at South African Universities currently rank amongst the lowest in the world • approx 15% of students of a cohort graduate in the minimum study period. • 40% of students drop out of university in their first year of study • The drop-outs are largely amongst Africa students
Reasons (most common) include: • In SA - • finance, • poor school preparation, and • inadequate teaching and support at higher education institutions. • In other parts of the world: • reasons for high dropout from higher education seems to be located within a students’ experience discourse suggesting that negative students experiences of higher education is the root cause of student dropout • lack of quality within higher education • academic staffs’ effectiveness
analysis of lit review: • If you look through the students lens, student dropout is viewed largely as a result of negative students’ experiences of campus life. • Looking through the lens of the institutions, student dropout is viewed largely as from external background factors.
Institutional stats on student throughput in undergraduate prog
Conceptual framework guiding the study • framework
Summary • Symbolic vs actual achievements (statistical modeling could assist in evaluating this tension) • Individual vs group achievements (need to shift our discourses from group discourses to particular discourses – as is evident in the various qualitative analysis) • Access does not stand on its own. It must be accompanied by support and monitoring (the questions is: what support and by whom) • EFA issues of target setting and target attainment are playing out in higher educ (how can we learn from other agendas within a transformation gaze?)