1 / 31

Compositional Dependence of the Structure of TiO 2 :Fe Nanorods

Compositional Dependence of the Structure of TiO 2 :Fe Nanorods. A. Kremenovic, B. Antic, E. S. Bozin, J. Blanusa, M. Comor, Ph. Colomban, L. Mazzerolles. I N T R O D U C T I O N. TiO 2 is a very promising photocatalyst : exhibits higher activity compared to that of other semiconductors

ocean
Download Presentation

Compositional Dependence of the Structure of TiO 2 :Fe Nanorods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Compositional Dependence of the Structure of TiO2:Fe Nanorods A. Kremenovic, B. Antic, E. S. Bozin, J. Blanusa, M. Comor, Ph. Colomban, L. Mazzerolles ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  2. I N T R O D U C T I O N TiO2 is a very promising photocatalyst: • exhibits higher activity compared to that of other semiconductors • shows excellent chemical stability • stability in nano higher for anatase than rutile • nontoxic • environmentally friendly → photocatalytic activity against organic waste e.g. herbicides ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  3. pure TiO2 vs. TiO2:Fe → absorption significantly shifts from UV towards VIS • Fe3+ in TiO2 can reduce the e–-h+ recombination rate • in nanorods charge carriers are free to move throughout the length of the crystal → lower probability of e–-h+ recombination ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  4. C H A R A C T E R I Z A T I O N • TEM/HRTEM • morphology • crystallographic orientation • XRPD • Rietveld + line broadening analysis • PDF • Magnetic measurements – SQUID • Raman spectroscopy ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  5. TEM/HRTEM • crystal form and morphology ≠ f(%Fe) → flower • dislocations and stacking faults unobserved ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  6. TEM/HRTEM - morphology • rutile nanorods grown from a central nucleus ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  7. TEM/HRTEM - morphology • nanorods 30-100 nm in length and 4-5 nmwidth ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  8. TEM/HRTEM - crystallographic orientation • nanorods are grown parallel to the c-axis of the rutile structure ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  9. TEM/HRTEM - crystallographic orientation • longitudinal section Fourier Transform (similar to a local microdiffraction) ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  10. transverse section - facets corresponding to (110) planes→ 110 plane most dense/stable Fourier Transform (similar to a local microdiffraction) ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  11. XRPD • data collected at 6-ID-D beam-line at Argonne National Laboratory • λ = 0.125677 Å. • Rietveld + line broadening analysis + PDF ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  12. ? %Fe ? ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  13. Rietveld refinement – rutile + anatase Fe - 1.05% Rwp~ 3% A ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  14. Rietveld refinement – rutile Fe - 0.22% ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  15. WPPF - rutile Fe - 0.22% ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  16. Difference between Rietveld and WPPF • preferential orientation of crystallites no → Ritveld check done • low crystallite statistics no → nano specimen • inadequate line broadening model WPPM in plan • background problem i.e. amorphous like phase PDF and Raman ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  17. Structure, unit cell and size – strain analysis • needle like size line broadening model • isotropic strain broadening model ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009 degree of anisotropy

  18. rutile crystal structure in accord with literature • Fe content and distribution unable to refine • irregular change of unit cell parameters → no preferential direction for Fe incorporation • large size broadening anisotropy in accord with HRTEM • small strain anisotropy → no dislocations and stacking faults; probable point defects inside ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  19. Rw~ 15% PDF – spherical particles model ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  20. HRTEM, Rietveld and PDF – anatase % anatase in a flower centre ??? ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  21. SQUID – magnetic measurements ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  22. the origin of ferromagnetism of TiO2:Fe still remains a controversial • here always paramagnetic no matter Fe % • no Fe cluster formations ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  23. Raman spectroscopy ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  24. ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  25. rutile and anatase confirmed • no brookite • more Fe more defects – “boson” peak • origin of “boson” peak - Fe (and vacancy) distribution break the vibration • most of defects are point defects ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  26. Where is anatase? • HRTEM – anatase unobserved • XRPD – anatase observed in Rietveld but better in PDF → low crystallinity • Raman – best observation of anatase • Low quantity of anatase, c.c. 5% • Anatase in a flower centre ??? • Anatase first to crystallize then rutile ? ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  27. Acknowledgements: • U.S. Dep. of Energy - DE-AC02-98CH10886 • MSTRS • CNRS • FP6 INCO-026401 WBC • FP7 REGPOT3 - 204374 TERCE-NIPMSS ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  28. Recommendation for further synthesis • Small amount of Fe stabilize rutile crystal structure • Fe concentration does not influence significantly on morphology and size of nanorods • Fe concentration influence on vacancy concentration • “Play” with synthesis conditions in order to obtain pure rutile with small amount of Fe ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  29. Supplementary material • XPS → only Ti4+ but Fe3+ (dominantly) and Fe2+ • Doping with Fe ions has great influence on optical characteristics of the host material → shift of the absorption threshold toward VIS spectral region. • No increase of photocatalytic activity after doping. • The induced photoluminescence as well as the decrease of photocatalytic activity is probably the consequence of the introduction of oxygen vacancies through doping procedure. ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  30. For higher dopant concentrations also recombination of photogenerated charge carriers occurs with higher probability. ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

  31. PDF – F(Q) ACA Meeting, Toronto Canada, July 25-30, 2009

More Related