1 / 39

Charmonium Spectroscopy atPANDA

Charmonium Spectroscopy atPANDA. Diego Bettoni INFN, Ferrara, Italy for the  PANDA Collaboration Mainz, Germany, 19 November 2009 . Outline. Introduction HESR and  PANDA Experimental Method The scientific program of PANDA Charmonium at  PANDA Charmonium below threshold  DD

odell
Download Presentation

Charmonium Spectroscopy atPANDA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Charmonium Spectroscopy atPANDA Diego Bettoni INFN, Ferrara, Italy for the PANDA Collaboration Mainz, Germany, 19 November 2009

  2. Outline • Introduction • HESR and PANDA • Experimental Method • The scientific program ofPANDA • Charmonium atPANDA • Charmonium below threshold • DD • Charmonium hybrids • Charmonium in nuclei • Summary

  3. Production rate 2x107/sec • Pbeam = 1 - 15 GeV/c • Nstored= 5x1010 p • Internal Target _ High-Energy Storage Ring High resolution mode • dp/p ~ 10-5 (electron cooling) • Lumin. = 1031 cm-2 s-1 High luminosity mode • Lumin. = 2 x 1032 cm-2 s-1 • dp/p ~ 10-4 (stochastic cooling) PANDA at FAIR

  4. pp Annihilation In pp collisions the coherent annihilation of the 3 quarks in the p with the 3 antiquarks in thep makes it possible to form directly states with all non-exotic quantum numbers. The measurement of masses and widths is very accurate because it depends only on the beam parameters, not on the experimental detector resolution, which determines only the sensitivity to a given final state. Charmonium

  5. Experimental Method The cross section for the process: pp  R  final state is given by the Breit-Wigner formula: The production rate  is a convolution of the BW cross section and the beam energy distribution function f(E,E): The resonance mass MR, total width R and product of branching ratios into the initial and final state BinBout can be extracted by measuring the formation rate for that resonance as a function of the cm energy E. Charmonium

  6. Example: c1 and c2 scans in Fermilab E835 1 2 PANDA at FAIR

  7. PANDA Detector • Detector Requirements • (Nearly) 4 solid angle coverage • (partial wave analysis) • High-rate capability • (2×107 annihilations/s) • Good PID (, e, µ, , K, p) • Momentum resolution ( 1 %) • Vertex reconstruction for D, K0s,  • Efficient trigger • Modular design • Pointlike interaction region • Lepton identification • Excellent calorimetry • Energy resolution • Sensitivity to low-energy • photons See presentation by Lars Schmitt PANDA at FAIR

  8. Recent Activities • Electromagnetic Calorimeter TDR written • Crystals funded • Dipole magnet and forward Čerenkov funded • Magnet TDR written • Tracking TDR in progress • First version of PANDA Physics Book completed. ArXiV:0903.3905.

  9. PANDA Physics Program • QCD BOUND STATES • CHARMONIUM • GLUONIC EXCITATIONS • HEAVY-LIGHT SYSTEMS • STRANGE AND CHARMED BARYONS • NON PERTURBATIVE QCD DYNAMICS • HADRONS IN THE NUCLEAR MEDIUM • NUCLEON STRUCTURE • GENERALIZED DISTRIBUTION AMPLITUDES (GDA) • DRELL-YAN • ELECTROMAGNETIC FORM FACTORS • ELECTROWEAK PHYSICS PANDA at FAIR

  10. Charmonium Spectroscopy • Main issues • All 8 states below threshold observed, • some (precision) measurements still • missing: • hc (e.g. width) • c(1S) • c(2S) (small splitting from (2S)) • The region above open charm threshold • must be explored in great detail: • find missing D states • explain newly discovered states • (cc or other) • confirm vector states seen in R See presentation by Simon Eidelmann

  11. Charmonium at PANDA • At 21032cm-2s-1 accumulate 8 pb-1/day (assuming 50 % overall efficiency)  104107 (cc) states/day. • Total integrated luminosity 1.5 fb-1/year (at 21032cm-2s-1, assuming 6 months/year data taking). • Improvements with respect to Fermilab E760/E835: • Up to ten times higher instantaneous luminosity. • Better beam momentum resolution p/p = 10-5 (GSI) vs 210-4 (FNAL) • Better detector (higher angular coverage, magnetic field, ability to detect hadronic decay modes). • Fine scans to measure masses to  100 KeV, widths to  10 %. • Explore entire region below and above open charm threshold. • Decay channels • J/+X , J/  e+e-, J/  m+m- • gg • hadrons • DD • Precision measurement of known states • Find missing states (e.g. D states) • Understand newly discovered states • Get a complete picture of the dynamics of • the cc system.

  12. p- 25 MeV p p+ K+ K 100 MeV K- D D- 50 MeV D+ Hayaski, PLB 487 (2000) 96 Morath, Lee, Weise, priv. Comm. Hadrons in Nuclear Matter • Partial restoration of chiral symmetry in • nuclear matter • Light quarks are sensitive to quark condensate • Evidence for mass changes of pions and kaons has been deduced previously: • deeply bound pionic atoms • (anti)kaon yield and phase space distribution • (cc) states are sensitive to gluon condensate • small (5-10 MeV/c2) in medium modifications for low-lying (cc) (J/, c) • significant mass shifts for excited states: • 40, 100, 140 MeV/c2 for cJ, ’, (3770) resp. • D mesons are the QCD analog of the H-atom. • chiral symmetry to be studied on a single light quark • theoretical calculations disagree in size and sign of mass shift (50 MeV/c2 attractive – 160 MeV/c2 repulsive) vacuum nuclear medium

  13. Charmonium in Nuclei • Measure J/ and D production cross section in p annihilation on a series of nuclear targets. • J/ nucleus dissociation cross section • Lowering of the D+D- mass would allow charmonium states to decay into this channel,thus resulting in a dramatic increase of width (1D) 20 MeV  40 MeV (2S) .28 MeV  2.7 MeV Study relative changes of yield and width of the charmonium states. • In medium mass reconstructed from dilepton (cc) or hadronic decays (D)

  14. Monte Carlo Simulations • Event generators with accurate decay models for the individual physics channels as well as for the relevant background channels (e.g. Dual Parton Model, UrQMD, ...). • Particle tracking through the complete PANDA detector by using the GEANT4 transport code. • Digitization which models the signals of the individual detectors and their processing in the frontend electronics. • Reconstruction and identification of charged and neutral particles, providing lists of particle candidates for the physics analysis. Kalman Filter for charged particle tracking. • High-level analysis tools which allow to make use of vertex and kinematical fits and to reconstruct decay trees.

  15. Charmonium Decays to J/ pp  cc  J/ + X, J/  e+e-, (+-) • Tagged by lepton pair with invariant mass equal to M(J/ ). • Main background source: misidentified +- pairs. • Electron analysis: • two electron candidates: one Loose one Tight. • kinematic fit to J/ hypothesis with vertex constraint. • P(fit) > 0.001. • Additional cuts for exclusive final states: • pp  J/+- • pp  J/00 • pp  c1,c2J/ • pp  J/ • pp  J/ PANDA at FAIR

  16. pp  J/ +-  e+e- +- • J/ selection • two pion candidates (VeryLoose) • vertex fit to J/+- Main background process: pp  + - + - Estimated background cross section < 10 pb PANDA at FAIR

  17. pp  J/ 00  e+e- 00 Main background process: pp  + - 0 0 Estimated S/B 25 PANDA at FAIR

  18. hc c  3 • Pair 2 s to form cmass (12). • 4C fit to hc candidate. • N=3. • CL (4C fit) > 10-4: • 0.4 GeV < E < 0.6 GeV. • |cos| < 0.6 . • M(13),M(23) > 1 GeV. PANDA at FAIR

  19. hc c  3 signal efficiency 8.2 % In high-luminosity mode (L = 21032cm-2s-1) expect 20 signal events/day. PANDA at FAIR

  20. hc c    4K •  candidates: K pairs in appropriate mass window. • 4C fit to beam-momentum • CL (4C) > 0.05 • c invariant mass [2.9, 3.06] GeV . • E [0.4, 0.6] GeV •  mass [0.99, 1.05] GeV • no 0 in event 345 nb 60 nb < 3 nb 30 b DPM estimate signal efficiency 24 % In high-luminosity mode (L = 21032cm-2s-1) expect 92 signal events/day.

  21. Sensitivity to hc Width Measurement signal efficiency =0.24 each point corresponds to 5 days of data taking PANDA at FAIR

  22. pp DD • Charmonium states above open charm threshold • Charm spectroscopy • Search for hybrids decaying to DD • Rare D decays (and CP violation) • Main issue: separation of charm signal from large hadronic background Cross section estimates: Breit-Wigner, with pp BR scaled from  See also presentation by Tobias Stockmanns

  23. Event Selection • Loose mass window cut before vertex fitting m = 0.3 GeV/c2. • Minimum 6 charged tracks. • All decay particles must form a common vertex. • 4C kinematic fit to constrain beam energy and momentum: CL > 510-2. • K/ selection Loose (LH > 0.3). • Only one combination per event.

  24. Signal Efficiency after 5C fit (D0 mass constraint) overall efficiency (signal) = 27.4 % (4C fit) overall efficiency (signal) = 24.0 % (5C fit) overall efficiency (signal) = 40 %

  25. Background Studies

  26. 2K4 Background Two-dimensional cut on D momentum reduces 2K4 background by factor 26. pT vs pL signal pT vs pL 2K4 background Cut on z of D decay vertex: z > 0.088 cm S/B = 1 (signal) = 7.8 % For the D*+D*- channel the analysis gives S/B = 1/3. An additional cut on the zof the D0 decay vertex gives S/B=3/2, bringing the signal efficiency from 24 % to 12.7 %.

  27. Non Strange Background

  28. Charmonium Hybrids Simulation • Charmonium hybrid ground state • expected to be spin-exotic JPC = 1-+ • mass prediction: 4.1 – 4.4 GeV/c2 • In this analysis: • assume M = 4.29 MeV/c2,  = 20 MeV • produced inpp with recoil particle at 15 GeV • decay modes • assume signal cross section to be of the same order of magnitude as

  29. c100 channel Reconstruction efficiency 6.83 % for J/  e+e- Expected events per day

  30. c100 background studies S/N  250-10100 R depending on J/ background channel very low background contamination expected if

  31. D0D0* Decay mode Signal reconstruction efficiency 5.17 % background rejection > 1.6105

  32. Y(3940) J/  e+e-+-0

  33. Reconstruction efficiency 14.7 % for J/  e+e-

  34. J/ background studies

  35. pA  J/X

  36. Required rejection factor of the order of 106 achieved !!!

  37. Summary and Outlook The HESR at the GSI FAIR facility will deliverp beams of unprecedented quality with momenta up to 15 GeV/c (√s  5.5 GeV). This will allow PANDA to carry out the following measurements: SPECTROSCOPY • High-resolution charmonium spectroscopy in formation experiments • Study of gluonic excitations (hybrids and glueballs) and other exotica (e.g. multiquark) • Study of hadrons in nuclear matter • Open charm physics • Hypernuclear physics NUCLEON STRUCTURE • Proton Timelike Form Factors • Crossed-Channel Compton Scattering • Drell-Yan The performance of the detector and the sensitivity to the various physics channels have been estimated reliably by means of detailed Monte Carlo simulations: • Acceptance • Resolution • Signal/Background The simulations show that the final states of interest can be detected with good efficiency and that the background situation is under control.

More Related