160 likes | 292 Views
E N D
1. Performance Measures in the Federal-aid Highway Program – A National Perspective King W. Gee
Associate Administrator for Infrastructure
Federal Highway Administration
Presentation Outline:
Context for Performance Measures & Management
Performance Management in FY 2012 Budget Proposal
Elements & Implications for State DOTs
Ongoing Efforts to Advance Performance Management Collaboratively
Presentation Outline:
Context for Performance Measures & Management
Performance Management in FY 2012 Budget Proposal
Elements & Implications for State DOTs
Ongoing Efforts to Advance Performance Management Collaboratively
3. Example – Mn/DOT Investment plans include highway and other modes and specific district investment plans. The highway investment plan makes the most extensive use of performance measures and performance-based planning approaches, but all plans follow the same basic techniques.
The highway investment plan has three time frames (5-year, 10-year, and 20-year)Investment plans include highway and other modes and specific district investment plans. The highway investment plan makes the most extensive use of performance measures and performance-based planning approaches, but all plans follow the same basic techniques.
The highway investment plan has three time frames (5-year, 10-year, and 20-year)
4. FY 2012 Budget Proposal: Creates Performance Management Framework Outlines key elements of performance-based program
Recognizes need to address performance in national goal areas of:
Safety
Infrastructure Condition
Economic Competitiveness
Environmental Sustainability
Livability
Focuses initially on safety, pavement and bridge conditions
Principles:
Evolutionary
Build from existing data/measures
Provide framework for more comprehensive program
Acknowledge shared responsibility for goals/target setting
Provide accountability
Process:
Secretary, with input, establishes quantifiable performance measures and national performance goals
States work in partnership with FHWA to set state targets
Envisions planning process as vehicle to implement performance management
Calls on States to report annually on progress in meeting targets
Provides additional flexibility when targets are met
Requires performance improvement plan when targets not met
Principles:
Evolutionary
Build from existing data/measures
Provide framework for more comprehensive program
Acknowledge shared responsibility for goals/target setting
Provide accountability
Process:
Secretary, with input, establishes quantifiable performance measures and national performance goals
States work in partnership with FHWA to set state targets
Envisions planning process as vehicle to implement performance management
Calls on States to report annually on progress in meeting targets
Provides additional flexibility when targets are met
Requires performance improvement plan when targets not met
5. Performance Management Elements - Elements within the framework for highway program performance management
Hope to illustrate concepts and to present challenges and opportunities ahead of us
General agreement on areas of national interest
Currently, greatest challenge/opportunity is in the definition of performance for each of these areas- Elements within the framework for highway program performance management
Hope to illustrate concepts and to present challenges and opportunities ahead of us
General agreement on areas of national interest
Currently, greatest challenge/opportunity is in the definition of performance for each of these areas
6. Performance Management Elements - Elements within the framework for highway program performance management
Hope to illustrate concepts and to present challenges and opportunities ahead of us
General agreement on areas of national interest
Currently, greatest challenge/opportunity is in the definition of performance for each of these areas
SAFETY
Builds off of Strategic Highway Safety Plans
Identifies need to invest in data – Highway Safety Data Improvement Program
Provides Accountability:
If target is met in previous year, State may transfer up to 50% of HSIP funds to other safety programs
If target is not met in previous year, State must use obligation authority equal to prior year HSIP apportionment only for highway safety improvement projects
States that do not meet targets for two consecutive years to develop performance improvement plan
CONDITION:
Performance requirements limited to enhanced NHS
Requires risk-based asset management plan
Provides Accountability:
If State meets targets for 3 consecutive years, it may use apportionments on non-NHS roads
States that do not meet targets for 2 consecutive years will be required to develop performance improvement plan
- Elements within the framework for highway program performance management
Hope to illustrate concepts and to present challenges and opportunities ahead of us
General agreement on areas of national interest
Currently, greatest challenge/opportunity is in the definition of performance for each of these areas
SAFETY
Builds off of Strategic Highway Safety Plans
Identifies need to invest in data – Highway Safety Data Improvement Program
Provides Accountability:
If target is met in previous year, State may transfer up to 50% of HSIP funds to other safety programs
If target is not met in previous year, State must use obligation authority equal to prior year HSIP apportionment only for highway safety improvement projects
States that do not meet targets for two consecutive years to develop performance improvement plan
CONDITION:
Performance requirements limited to enhanced NHS
Requires risk-based asset management plan
Provides Accountability:
If State meets targets for 3 consecutive years, it may use apportionments on non-NHS roads
States that do not meet targets for 2 consecutive years will be required to develop performance improvement plan
7. Performance Management Elements - need consistent definition that can be applied across States
Challenge – State’s needing to move away from their established, effective approach to defining performance
A consistent view of performance, even for established measures, can be a challenge (example)
Opportunity – ability to present and evaluate performance at the corridor, regional and national level - need consistent definition that can be applied across States
Challenge – State’s needing to move away from their established, effective approach to defining performance
A consistent view of performance, even for established measures, can be a challenge (example)
Opportunity – ability to present and evaluate performance at the corridor, regional and national level
8. Performance Management Elements Setting targets and tracking process is a challenge that many State’s have not met. GAO report on performance based planning identified that only 18 States include targets in planning documents where all States include some form of a broad transportation goal.
Development of targets is challenging but it is critical in order to tie program commitments and delivery to performance outcomes.
Challenge – how do we assess a State’s target in support of a national goal?
Opportunity – how can we design our program to focus federal funds on systems of the greatest national interest?Setting targets and tracking process is a challenge that many State’s have not met. GAO report on performance based planning identified that only 18 States include targets in planning documents where all States include some form of a broad transportation goal.
Development of targets is challenging but it is critical in order to tie program commitments and delivery to performance outcomes.
Challenge – how do we assess a State’s target in support of a national goal?
Opportunity – how can we design our program to focus federal funds on systems of the greatest national interest?
9. Performance Management Elements Plan is a commitment from the State/MPO to invest funds with the specific intent to achieve a desire performance result
Challenge – State & FHWA – how do we assess the effectiveness of the investment plan – what’s the role for FHWA?
Opportunity – the degree to which the plans can be rolled up nationally will provide us a better picture on the impacts on performance.Plan is a commitment from the State/MPO to invest funds with the specific intent to achieve a desire performance result
Challenge – State & FHWA – how do we assess the effectiveness of the investment plan – what’s the role for FHWA?
Opportunity – the degree to which the plans can be rolled up nationally will provide us a better picture on the impacts on performance.
10. Performance Management Elements - Challenge/Opportunity – track key indicators on a routine basis that can be used to assess to potential in reaching a performance target. Where will this data come from and how will it be accessed?
Track impacts on deliver (price increases, extreme weather events) – better understand how to mitigate these risk events.
Track quality of projects and their impact on performance. Where does this data come from – what is the federal role?- Challenge/Opportunity – track key indicators on a routine basis that can be used to assess to potential in reaching a performance target. Where will this data come from and how will it be accessed?
Track impacts on deliver (price increases, extreme weather events) – better understand how to mitigate these risk events.
Track quality of projects and their impact on performance. Where does this data come from – what is the federal role?
11. Performance Management Elements - Challenge - Keeping up with technology while still providing for a consistent, reliable approach to monitoring. Don’t want to stifle innovation so that standardization is maintained.
Need to be able to ask “why” – do we have the right information? Do we have the right tools? Example of Blue CRUSH – Memphis Police used predictive analytics to drop crime 31% by proactively allocating resources to get ahead of crime (based on past trends)
Challenge – reporting – where is the national data source. Need to assess national vs State vs local data sources – do they tell the same story? If not, why?- Challenge - Keeping up with technology while still providing for a consistent, reliable approach to monitoring. Don’t want to stifle innovation so that standardization is maintained.
Need to be able to ask “why” – do we have the right information? Do we have the right tools? Example of Blue CRUSH – Memphis Police used predictive analytics to drop crime 31% by proactively allocating resources to get ahead of crime (based on past trends)
Challenge – reporting – where is the national data source. Need to assess national vs State vs local data sources – do they tell the same story? If not, why?
12. Ongoing FHWA Efforts Establish Office of Program Performance Management
Build internal capacity to support performance-based program
Develop analysis tools and training to assist States/Locals in advancing performance management
Facilitate collaboration between highway and transit communities
13. Ongoing FHWA Efforts Continue to work in partnership with AASHTO to advance all elements of performance management
More fully develop measures/data/systems in Safety, Pavement and Bridge areas
Invest in research in other goal areas
Develop methodology to integrate performance management into the planning process
14. FHWA’s Commitment to Performance Management Natural evolution to improve decision making and resource allocation
Improves transparency and accountability for federal funds
Opportunity to advance performance management practices prior to legislation
15. Recap: Implications for State DOTs Parallel to State Management Framework
Tiny Fraction of What is Used – Same Metrics?
Consistency Across State Lines
Definition of Metrics
Methodology of Data Collection
Accountability & State Priorities
Data Sourcing and Access
Analysis, Reporting & Forecasting
16. Thank You!