110 likes | 181 Views
Disclaimer. If any interpretive issues arise in relation to the issues covered in these presentations, the text of the MSC Scheme Documents will prevail in all instances. The MSC is not responsible for any issues arising to any parties as a result of consulting these presentations.
E N D
Disclaimer If any interpretive issues arise in relation to the issues covered in these presentations, the text of the MSC Scheme Documents will prevail in all instances. The MSC is not responsible for any issues arising to any parties as a result of consulting these presentations. If you are unsure of any details on any of the subjects covered, please consult the relevant MSC scheme documents or contact the MSC at standards@msc.org. MSC Executive November 2011 The best environmental choice in seafood
What does harmonisation involve? • Over to you – discuss with a partner what you think the key features of harmonisation are • Share ideas
Learning Objectives • To know when harmonisation should be carried out • To understand what’s involved in the harmonisation process
Agenda • Why harmonisation? • Which fisheries does it apply to? • What do certifiers need to do? This information can be found in the CR’s Annex CI and the Guidance to Annex CI.
Why Fishery Harmonisation? • Ensures quality and consistency of overlapping assessments/ certifications • Ensures equitable assessments and certifications • Provides clarity on assessment outcomes The best environmental choice in seafood
Fishery Harmonisation Applies to: • Fully overlapping fisheries (same P1, P2, P3) • Partially overlapping fisheries (some aspects of P1, P2, P3 are the same) The best environmental choice in seafood
What are overlapping fisheries? • “Two or more fisheries assessing some, or all, of the same aspects of MSC Principles 1, 2 and/or 3 within their respective units of certification”(i.e., the assessments are of the same species or gear in the same area or are managed under identical management plans/regimes)
Overlapping Assessments (in assessment at the same time) • Certifiers must ensure harmonisation of important steps in the assessment and subsequent surveillance • Must use the same assessment tree unless variation granted by the MSC • Consistent conclusions – evaluation, scoring and conditions • If an in-assessment fishery’s PCDR is available, harmonisation with it must occur.
Assessment Overlapping With Certified Fisheries • Certifiers must ensure that key assessment products and outcomes are harmonised with earlier assessments. • May use a different assessment tree but must include key aspects of the previous tree. • Assessment must be based on the rationale and scores of the certified fishery and must consider latest surveillance report for the fishery. • Similarly, surveillance must consider the assessment outcomes of the fishery under assessment. The best environmental choice in seafood
Questions & Answers Questions?