70 likes | 88 Views
This presentation discusses the barriers to high-performance computing (HPC) in U.S. industry and strategies to improve global competitiveness. Topics include HPC importance, industrial success stories, challenges for all HPC users, and opportunities for collaboration with government labs and universities.
E N D
The Missing Links to Widespread Improvements in U.S. Industrial Global Competitiveness Myron Ginsberg, Ph.D. ACM Fellow, IEEE Senior Member, and CTO HPC Research and Education Farmington Hills, MI 48335-1222 E-mail: m.ginsberg@ieee.org
Abstract of Presentation • This presentation will focus on current high-performance computing (HPC) barriers in U.S. industry and several approaches to improve the situation and resultant U.S. industrial competitiveness. The following topics will be included: U.S. Council on Competitiveness studies of U.S. globalization; reasons for lagging behind government research labs/academic research groups; reducing the time gap between product conception and production via use of HPC tools; arising opportunities for cooperative and innovative efforts with government labs and universities; and a collection of internet references documenting U.S. industry successes and failures as well as challenges to significantly improve effective product globalization.
Outline of Presentation • HPC importance for everyone • Flavors of HPC • Industrial HPC bottlenecks • HPC industrial success stories • Missing links • Challenges to all HPC users • Will HPC improve global competitiveness? • References
Missing Links • CSE Support Personnel • Assessing HPC Application Needs • Access to HPC Hardware Resources • ROI Case to Upper Management • ISV Tech Transfer Role • Opportunities for Gov/Academic Collaboration • Meeting Challenges to All HPC Users • On-Demand HPC cycles
Clark University Florida State Dept. of Sci Comp George Mason University George Washington U (VA) Georgia State University Georgia Tech University Indiana U (Bloomington) Mississippi State University MIT New York University Ohio University Old Dominion University Oregon State University Penn State University Princeton University Purdue University Rensselaer Polytechnic Rice University San Diego State University Stanford University SUNY Brockport SUNY Stony Brook Syracuse University U of California, Berkeley U of California, Santa Barbara U of Colorado (Denver) U of Delaware U of Houston U of Illinois (Chicago) U of Illinois (Urbana) U of Iowa U of Maryland (College Park) U of Michigan (Ann Arbor) U of Michigan (Dearborn) U of Minnesota U of Tennessee (Chattanooga) U of Tennessee (Knoxville) U of Texas (Austin) U of Utah College of William and Mary Wittenberg University Wofford College U.S. Computational Science Programs
References • D.A. Bader (ed.), Petascale Computing: Algorithms and Applications, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Atlanta, GA, 2008. • S. Conway, “INCITE Program Targets America Competitiveness,” HPCWIRE, Vol. 16, No. 6, Feb. 9, 2007, http://www.hpcwire.com/hpc/1255558.html • M. Ginsberg, “Influences on the Solution Process for Large, Numeric-Intensive Automotive Simulations,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2073, Springer, New York, 2001, pp.1189-1198. • M. Ginsberg, “Impediments to Future Use of Petaflop Class Computers for Large-Scale Scientific/Engineering Applications in U.S. Private Industry,” edited by V.S. Sunderam et al., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3514, Springer, New York, May 2005, pp. 1059-1066. • M. Ginsberg, “Challenges and Opportunities for U.S. Private Industry Utilization of HPC Technology, Proc 2007 International Conferences on Scientific Computing, ed. By H. R. Arabnia et al., WORLDCOMP07, June 25-28, 2007, Las Vegas, NV, CSREA Press, 2007, pp. 17-23. • M. Ginsberg, “Bibliographic Snapshots of High Performance / High Productivity Computing,” Chapter in Advances in Computers, edited by M. Zelkowitz, Vol. 72, Elsevier Publishing, 2008, pp. 255-318. • HPCWIRE,”OSC Announces HPC Partnership with Edison Welding,” HPCWIRE, Vol. 15, No. 47, Dec. 1, 2006,http://www.hpcwire.com/hpc/1129969.html • B. Jewett, “Infusing Petascale Thinking,” July 8, 2008, http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/News/Stories/Infusingpetascale/
References • HPCWIRE, “Speedo Dives into Supercomputing,” HPCWIRE, May 26, 2006,http://www.hpcwire.com/hpc/671349.html • E. Joseph, S. Conway, J. Wu, and S. Tichenor, “Reveal, Council on Competitiveness and USC-ISI In-Depth Study of Technical Computing End Users and HPC,” http://www.compete.org/images/uploads/File/PDF%20Files/CoC_REVEAL_APR10.pdf February 2008. • E. Joseph, S. Conway, S. Tichenor, and J. Wu, “Reflect, Council on Competitiveness and USC-ISI-In-Depth Study of Technical Computing End Users,” http://www.compete.org/Images/uploads/File/PDF%20Files/CoC_REFLECT_April3.pdf • PING Inc., “PING Shaves Strokes Off Its Golf Club Design Cycle with a Cray,” Nov. 7, 2005, http://www.wordcrft.com/LinkClick.aspx?link=samples%2FCRAY+Ping.pdf&tabid=136&mid=497 • A. Reuther and S. Tichenor, “Making the Business Case for High Performance : A Benefit-Cost Analysis Methodology,” CTWatch Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 4A, November 2006, pp. 2-8, http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2006/11/making-the-business-case-for-high-performance-computing-a-benefit-cost-analysis-methodology • SIAM Working Group on CSE Undergraduate Education, “Undergraduate Computational Science and Engineering Education,” SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, Sept. 20, 2006, http://www.siam.org/about/pdf/CSE_Report.pdf • SIAM Working Group on CSE Education,”Graduate Programs in Computational Science,”SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2008, http://www.siam.org/students/resources/cse_programs.php • J. Voelcker, “Battery Czar, IEEE Spectrum, Vol. 45, No. 8, August 2008, http://spectrum.ieee.org/aug08/6488