380 likes | 509 Views
Residential Development in Rural Lands Study. PUBLIC WORKSHOP 2. Welcome & Introductions. Rural Lands Steering Committee. Jeff Barra – Chairman George Billups Rich Costello Jim Daniels Victoria Fahringer Richard Krapf Gary Massie Jack Schmidt. Key Planning Staff.
E N D
Residential Development in Rural Lands Study PUBLICWORKSHOP 2
Rural Lands Steering Committee • Jeff Barra – Chairman • George Billups • Rich Costello • Jim Daniels • Victoria Fahringer • Richard Krapf • Gary Massie • Jack Schmidt
Key Planning Staff • Marvin Sowers – Planning Director • Don Davis • John Horne • Tammy Rosario – Project Manager • Ed Moran • Contact:planning@james-city.va.us
Consultant Team • Renaissance Planning Group • Eric Wright • Kristin Van Voorhees • Paradigm Design • Vlad Gavrilovic
RURAL LANDS PSA
Major Initiatives • 1986 County establishes first AFDs • 1989 Rural initiative results in 3 acre by-right zoning that exists today • 1997 Comp Plan suggests conservation easements (PDRs) and subdivision design (rural clusters) for rural open space • 1999 Rural Lands Study leads to Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) program and Primary Principles • 2003 Comprehensive Plan updated
BACKGROUND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Actions for RURAL LANDS 1 Establish incentives for very low density development 2 Consider strengthening requirements for 3-acre conventional development 3 Examine rural cluster provisions 4 Re-evaluate list of A-1 uses
BACKGROUND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Standards for RURAL LANDS 1 Preserve natural character 2 Minimize non-agricultural, non-forestal impacts 3 Discourage large-lot residential development 4 Permanently preserve open space
BACKGROUND RURAL DEVELOPMENT TRENDS • 70% of existing dwellings in PSA • 30% of existing dwellings in Rural Lands • Nearly ¼ of existing Rural Lands dwellings estimated to be in large subdivisions • County seeing indications of a renewed interest in major rural subdivisions
BACKGROUND 2005 RURAL LANDS STUDY • Charge of Committee: • Investigate alternatives for rural residential development consistent with Comp Plan • Explore rural clusters • Examine potential changes to conventional 3-acre development • Review patterns in other Virginia localities
OVERVIEW How should the Rural Lands develop?
OVERVIEW Purpose of Workshop #2 • Build on the feedback from Workshop #1 • Get public input for Steering Committee and Board on alternate “directions” for the future of the Rural Lands • Present wider range of development options besides clustering
OVERVIEW Tonight’s Format • 6:30 - 7:20Presentation • 7:30 - 8:30Small Group Sessions • 8:45 - 9:00“Dot” Voting Exercise • 9:00 - 9:15Next Steps & Adjourn
Results of Workshop 1
RESULTS Results of Workshop #1 • Workshop 1 looked primarily at experience of other counties and cluster options for JCC • Based on concerns heard at 1st workshop, steering committee widened focus to look at other development directions • Go to www.james-city.va.usand click on Rural Lands for detailed results of Workshop 1
CONTEXT Existing Regulatory Context • Rural Lands primarily zonedA-1(General Agriculture) andR-8(Rural Residential) • Uses allowed include agricultural and forestal uses, as well as single family residential properties at a density of1 unit per 3 acres • Under current by-right zoning, approximately6,800 unitspossible for development in Rural Lands
CONTEXT Existing Regulatory Context continued • Much of Rural Lands falls outside of public water and sewer facilities (JCSA), requiring individual wells and septic systems • Major subdivisions(more than 5 lots) require a central well and water system, which adds significant cost to development in Rural Lands • Minor subdivisions(5 lots or less) require dual drainfields, which have historically been restricted by soil conditions of the County
1No Change Development- Keep development patterns the same 2Cluster Development -Reorient the development pattern to preserve more open space without changing the density. a.Voluntarywith incentives b.Mandatoryrequire cluster but no change in density
1No Change Development- Keep development patterns the same 2Cluster Development- Reorient the development pattern to preserve more open space without changing the density. a.Voluntarywith incentives b.Mandatoryrequire cluster but no change in density 3 Lower Density Development - Reduce the development pattern by lowering the density. a. Voluntarywith incentives and disincentives b.Mandatoryrezoning to lower density
3a. Voluntary Lower Density Development (1 unit per 10 acres)
INSTRUCTIONS SMALL GROUP BREAKOUT SESSIONS 1 No Change Development -Choir Room 2 Cluster Development -Teen Living Room 3 Lower Density Development -Technology Room
GROUNDRULES SMALL GROUP BREAKOUT SESSIONS • Work together as a community • One person talks at a time • No side conversations • Direct your comments to the facilitators • Listen closely to each other • Be mindful of the time • Keep comments brief • Have Fun!
Residential Development in Rural LandsStudy PUBLIC WORKSHOP 2