260 likes | 702 Views
Majorneering. Group 5 Jason Lin Brent Tam Susan Tong Neel Punatar Ozgun Karabal Troy Ballesteros Adetama Hendrasto. Overview. IDEO Inspired Design Process Top 3 Designs User Survey Results and Analysis Top Design Careers and Potential Employers Curriculum Pros and Cons
E N D
Majorneering Group 5 Jason Lin Brent Tam Susan Tong Neel Punatar Ozgun Karabal Troy Ballesteros Adetama Hendrasto
Overview • IDEO Inspired Design Process • Top 3 Designs • User Survey Results and Analysis • Top Design • Careers and Potential Employers • Curriculum • Pros and Cons • Website Presentation
User Types Potential Students Faculty Industry High School, Community College, Undeclared COE Professors, Lecturers, GSIs Engineering Firms Design Firms Tech Companies IDEO Inspired Process 1. Defining User Types
2. Brainstorming Building Off Each Other’s Idea Radical Ideas Encouraged Quantity
3. Research Then we narrowed down our ideas…
Conservative Technical Communications Engineering Best Designs Moderate Prototype Engineering & IP Studies Radical Athletic Engineering
Student Surveys This major sounds fun and interesting. Sample Size: 102 PEIPS TCE AE
Student Surveys I am willing to pursue this major. Sample Size: 102 PEIPS TCE AE
Academic Faculty Surveys I am willing to teach a course in this major? Sample Size: 21 PEIPS TCE AE
Academic Faculty Surveys How useful do you feel is this major? Sample Size: 21 PEIPS TCE AE
Industry Surveys Would your company hire graduates of this major? Sample Size: 14 PEIPS TCE AE
Industry Surveys Which major would best satisfy skills lacking in current graduates? Sample Size: 14 PEIPS TCE AE
Decision Process • Based on Feedback • AE generated more high school student interest • PEIPS more interest from undergraduates and community college students • Industry professionals found PEIPS graduates most fitting in R&D departments • Industry found need for better communication skills in college graduates • We chose…
Prototype Engineering • Design • User Interface • Experience • Product • Tools • CAD • Simulation • Modeling
Intellectual Property Studies • Exposure to patent law • To understand patent process and regulations • Learn to modify ideas to create legally “new” ideas
Design Process • Process • Problem Definition • Brainstorming • Prototype Building • Product Testing through Usability • Statistical Analysis • Modifications • Creation of final product • Patenting of product
Freshman Fall Math 1A Calculus 4 Physics 7A Intro. To Statics and motions 4 Chemistry 1A Introduction to Chemistry 4 Humanities Suggested: English 1A (List E) 3 Total 15 Math 1B Calculus 4 Physics 7B Electricity and Magnetism 4 Eng. 45 Material Science 3 E28 CAD Design 3 PEIPS 1 Seminar – Intro to PEIPS 1 Total: 15 PEIPS at • Freshman Year Curriculum Fall Spring Sophomore Fall
Math 54 Math 53 Linear Algebra Multivariable Calculus 4 4 Eng. 77 Engineering 36 Programming Statics 2 3 PE 100 IEOR 170 Design Rapid Prototyping 3 2 EECS 40 Legal Studies 100 Introduction to Circuit Design Introduction to Law 4 4 Total: 14 Bolt 275 Introduction to Patent Law 3 Total: 15 Sophomore Year Curriculum Fall Spring
Junior Fall Option 1 3 CE 130 Mechanics of Materials 3 ME 104 Dynamics 3 EECS 143 Micro Fabrication Lab 4 Bolt 277 Patent law 3 Total: 16 Option 2 Ind Eng 130 Modeling and Simulation 3 ME 128 Advanced CAD 3 E 128 Advanced CAD 3 PEIPS 180 Molding Lab 3 Psychology 2 Intro to Psychology 3 Bolt 278.65 International IP 3 ME 130 Planar Machinery 3 E 190 Technical Communications 3 Total: 15 Junior Year Curriculum Fall Spring
Senior Year Curriculum Fall Spring
PEIPS at • Double Major/Minor/Options • ABET/COE/U.C. Requirements • Department Collaboration
Created Classes PEIPS 1 – Introduction to PEIPS PEIPS 100 – Rapid Prototyping PEIPS 180 – Molding Lab PEIPS 189 – Experience and Interface Design PEIPS 191 – Loophole Prototype Designs
Careers • Prototype Engineer • Design Engineer • Patent Examiner • Patent Attorney
Meets surveyed need in industry Flexibility to pursue patent law Uses many existing classes Law may not appeal to engineers Difficult to complete in 4 years Hard to collaborate departments Pros and Cons