1 / 56

THE TOTAL INSTALLED GENERATION CAPACITY OF TAMIL NADU AS ON 30.04.2009

THE TOTAL INSTALLED GENERATION CAPACITY OF TAMIL NADU AS ON 30.04.2009. RENEWABLE OR NON-CONVENTIONAL ENERGY SOURCES. INSTALLED CAPACITY AND PERCENTAGE OF INSTALLED CAPACITY AS ON 30.04.09. PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2009-10. in MW. PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING NEXT 5 YEARS.

ojal
Download Presentation

THE TOTAL INSTALLED GENERATION CAPACITY OF TAMIL NADU AS ON 30.04.2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE TOTAL INSTALLED GENERATION CAPACITY OF TAMIL NADU AS ON 30.04.2009

  2. RENEWABLE OR NON-CONVENTIONAL ENERGY SOURCES

  3. INSTALLED CAPACITY AND PERCENTAGE OF INSTALLED CAPACITY AS ON 30.04.09

  4. PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2009-10 in MW

  5. PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING NEXT 5 YEARS in MW

  6. PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2009-10 - Central Sector

  7. PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2009-10 - State Sector

  8. PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2010-11 - Central Sector

  9. PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2010-11 - State Sector

  10. PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2011-12 - Central and State Sector

  11. PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2012-13

  12. PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2013-14

  13. PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2014-15

  14. Power Evacuation System 2009-10

  15. Power Evacuation System 2009-10

  16. Power Evacuation System 2009-10

  17. Power Evacuation System 2010-11

  18. Power Evacuation System 2010-11

  19. Power Evacuation System 2010-11

  20. Wind Evacuation System 2010-11

  21. Wind Evacuation System 2010-11 - Contd

  22. Additional Lines 2010-11

  23. Additional Lines 2010-11 – Contd.

  24. Additional Lines 2010-11 – Contd.

  25. Additional Lines 2010-11 – Contd.

  26. Additional Lines 2010-11 – Contd.

  27. Power Evacuation System 2011-12

  28. Power Evacuation System 2011-12 – Contd.

  29. Wind Evacuation System 2011-12

  30. 230 KV Lines to be Executed by TNEB for 230/33 KV SS to be Executed by MPP -2011-12

  31. 230 KV Lines to be Executed by TNEB for 230/33 KV SS to be Executed by MPP -2011-12 – Contd.

  32. Other Proposed Lines - 2011-12

  33. Other Proposed Lines - 2011-12 – Contd.

  34. Power Evacuation System 2012-13

  35. Power Evacuation System 2013-14

  36. Power Evacuation System 2014-15

  37. Investment Required for Power Evacuation System During Next Five Years Rs Cr

  38. Investment Required for Transmission Schemes For Next Five Years

  39. TRANSMISSION FIXED ASSETS VALUE AS ON 31.03.2008 (Rs.inCrores) GROSS ASSETS : Rs. 6017.42 DEPRICIATION : Rs. 2333.38 NET VALUE : Rs. 3684.04

  40. AVENUES FOR INVESTMENTS • Permitting private operator on “Build, Own Operate and Maintain” basis • Joint venture with private operators • Joint venture with financial institutions • Funding by financial institutions

  41. Permitting private operatorADVANTAGES • Selection through competitive bidding • Total risk of completion/execution of project rests with the operator • Total risk of availability lies with the operator • Deployment of technology and expertise possible

  42. PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF PRIVATE OPERATORS • Identify the project • Selection of developers thro’ Tariff based competitive bidding. • Appoinment of BPC • Short listing thro’ RFQ • Signing of TSA

  43. PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF PRIVATE OPERATORS- Cont. • Monthly transmission charges – Escalable charges and non – escalable charges • Incentive - For availability of above 98% • Penalty - For availability of less than 95%

  44. JOINT VENTURE WITH PRIVATE OPERATORS ADVANTAGES • Increased requirement of equity can be met through the investor • Possible to get technology and expertise DISADVANTAGES • Finding a private operator - cumbersome process • Possibility of mutual conflict • Cost of capital likely to be high

  45. DISADVANTAGES • Likely to be a costlier option • Utilities continue to pay for 25 years at the escalated rate • No buy back • Flexibility for transmission utility absent

  46. JOINT VENTURE WITH FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ADVANTAGES • Increased requirement of equity can be met through the investor • Easy to find partner DISADVANTAGES • Possibility of mutual conflict • Cost of capital likely to be high • Likely conditionalities

  47. FUNDING BY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ADVANTAGES • The cost of capital is the least • Less conditionalities • Full exploitation of available expertise • Ensure continuous growth of utility DISADVANTAGES • Mustering equity • Ability to complete the project on time • Ability to maintain availability

  48. FEASIBILITY OF EXECUTION BY THE UTILITY PREREQUISITES • Financial Capability • Technical Capability • Administrative Capability

  49. FINANCIAL CAPABILITY Assumptions Gross asset as on 31/03/08 : Rs 6017 Crs Equity (30%) : Rs 1805 Crs Outstanding Loan : Rs 1878 Crs ROE (17.48%) : Rs 315 Crs Investment from 2009-10 taken separately

  50. Study of financial capability

More Related