230 likes | 359 Views
BEYOND STAGE 3 Building on ANCA’s Successes and Avoiding Its Failures. 2001 Airport Noise Symposium San Diego, California S TEVEN F. P FLAUM. ANCA’S KEY OBJECTIVES. 1. Stop spread of local noise restrictions 2. Reduce noise by requiring compliance with Stage 3 by year 2000.
E N D
BEYOND STAGE 3Building on ANCA’s Successes and Avoiding Its Failures 2001 Airport Noise Symposium San Diego, California STEVEN F. PFLAUM
ANCA’S KEY OBJECTIVES 1. Stop spread of local noise restrictions 2. Reduce noise by requiring compliance with Stage 3 by year 2000
ANCA’S CONSEQUENCES 1. No new local noise restrictions 2. All Stage 3 fleet of aircraft >75,000 pounds • Development of hushkits 3. Growth in residential sound insulation programs
RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAMSReasons for Their Growth Billions have been spent Virtual ban on noise restrictions by FAR Part 161 Communities cannot be ignored
RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAMSBoon or Boondoggle? Measure efficacy against objectives Don’t confuse means with end Why do we care about noise impacts?
RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAMS Need to know effect on percentage of people highly annoyed
IMPORTANCE OF LEARNING LESSONS FROM ANCA Stage 4 standards will be established Congress will have to decide whether to go beyond what ICAO decides
DISTINCT ISSUES Stage 4 standard for new certificated aircraft • CAEP/5 agreement Application of Stage 4 standard to new manufactured aircraft • No CAEP/5 agreement Phase-out of Stage 3 aircraft • No CAEP/5 agreement
ANCA’S KEY OBJECTIVES 1. Stop spread of local noise ordinances 2. Reduce noise by requiring compliance with Stage 3 by year 2000
ANCA II’S KEY OBJECTIVES 1. Avoid spread of local noise ordinances 2. Further reduce noise by requiring or encouraging fleet-wide compliance with Stage 4
BASIC OPTIONSFOR “ANCA II” One “do nothing” alternative Two interim alternatives Two Stage 3 phase-out alternatives
OPTIONS FOR “ANCA II”Option No. 1:The Do Nothing Alternative Don’t go beyond CAEP/5 agreement Rely on aging to phase out Stage 3 aircraft
OPTIONS FOR “ANCA II”Option No. 2:Stage 4 Manufacturing Alternative Require all manufactured aircraft to comply with Stage 4 by date certain
OPTIONS FOR “ANCA II”Option No. 3:The Anti-Hushkit Alternative Ban operation of hushkitted Stage 3 aircraft • The European Union proposal
OPTIONS FOR “ANCA II”Options 4 & 5:Stage 3 Phase-Out Alternatives 1. Ban new aircraft unless Stage 4 2. Non-addition rule 3. Either permit or prohibit recertification of aircraft as Stage 4 • Recertification would encourage hushkits
“ANCA II”The Preferred Solution Key is ambitious Stage 4 standard • CAEP/5 is inadequate
WHY CAEP/5 IS DISAPPOINTING Established 2006 standard that nearly all large aircraft being built already meet Weak Stage 4 standard prompted by concern about Stage 3 phase-out • But does not require phase-out “Balanced approach”: a step backward?
“ANCA II”The Preferred Solution Key is ambitious Stage 4 standard • CAEP/5 is inadequate • Strive for long-term meaningful noise reduction If CAEP/5 is adopted • Apply Stage 4 standard to all manufactured aircraft by 2003 • Consider phase-out of hushkitted planes
FUTURE OF RESIDENTIAL SOUND INSULATION PROGRAMS Independent of ANCA II Need to know effect on percentage of people highly annoyed
Thank you. Steven F. Pflaum 312-984-3641 spflaum@mwe.com