1 / 73

Department of Computer Science and Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology

Point-Set Embeddings of Planar Graphs with Fewer Bends. M. Sc. Engg. Thesis Md. Emran Chowdhury (040805068P) Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Md. Saidur Rahman. Department of Computer Science and Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology. Contents. Problem Definition.

oksana
Download Presentation

Department of Computer Science and Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Point-Set Embeddings of Planar Graphs with Fewer Bends M. Sc. Engg. Thesis Md. Emran Chowdhury (040805068P) Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Md. Saidur Rahman Department of Computer Science and Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology

  2. Contents • Problem Definition • Motivation • Previous Results and Our Results • Upward Point-Set Embedding • Orthogonal Point-Set Embedding • Conclusion and Future Works

  3. Point-Set Embedding Input d d f f e e a a G S c c b b Each vertex is placed at a distinct point

  4. Point-Set Embedding Input f d e f Bend e d c a G S b c b a Each vertex is placed at a distinct point Output Each edge is drawn by straight or poly line

  5. Upward Point-Set Embedding Input f d e f e d c a G S b c b a Each vertex is placed at a distinct point Output Each edge is drawn upward

  6. f d e f e d f c a e S G b c d b a c b a Upward Point-Set Embedding d f e Not every graph has upward point-set embedding on a fixed point-set a G S c f d e f b e d Each edge is drawn upward c a G’ has no upward point-set embedding on S S G’ b c b a

  7. Upward Point-Set Embedding with mapping 4 3 φ 2 b b S 1 a a c c G d d

  8. Upward Point-Set Embedding with mapping d Finding upward point-set embedding with mapping is a real challenge c φ b b S a a c G φ’ d b c No upward point-set embedding with this mapping d S a

  9. e f c d g h a b j k Orthogonal Point-Set Embedding Input planar graph G point-set in the plane

  10. j k e f h g c d g h f e a b j k d c a b Output Orthogonal Point-Set Embedding Each edge is drawn as a sequence of vertical and horizontal line segments

  11. Contents • Problem Definition • Motivation

  12. f f e e d d c b c b a a Motivation Point-Set Embedding In VLSI design, often the places for the modules are fixed, we have to connect the modules w. r. t. the inter connection graph Interconnection Graph

  13. f f e e d d c b c b a a Motivation Point-Set Embedding It is always desirable to reduce the number of bends Interconnection Graph VLSI Layout

  14. Contents • Problem Definition • Motivation • Previous Results and Our Results

  15. Previous Results and Our Results Upward Point-Set Embedding Authors Problem Graph class Results upward point-set embedding Upward planar digraphs at most two bends per edge Giordano et. al. ’07 upward point-set embedding with mapping upper bound on total number of bends Upward planar digraphs at most 2n-3 bends per edge Giordano, Liotta, and Whiteside ’09 upward point-set embedding with mapping Upward planar digraphs This Thesis at most n-3 bends per edge

  16. Previous Results and Our Results Orthogonal Drawing Authors Problem Graph class Results Orthogonal drawing Cubic 3-connected plane graphs bend optimal drawing Rahman et. al. ’99 Time complexity = O(n) But, they did not consider the point-set embedding Orthogonal drawing plane graphs with  ≤ 3 bend optimal drawing Rahman and Nishizeki ’02 Orthogonal drawing plane graphs with  ≤ 3 no bend drawing Rahman, Nishizeki and Naznin ’03

  17. Previous Results and Our Results Poly-line Point-Set Embedding Authors Problem Graph class Results Point-set embedding General plane graphs 2 bends per edge Kaufman and Wiese ’02 But, the size of the vertices may increase One can draw the edge orthogonally Time complexity = O(n2)

  18. Previous Results and Our Results Orthogonal Point-Set Embedding Authors Problem Graph class Results Point-set embedding General plane graphs 2 bends per edge Kaufman and Wiese ’02 But, the size of the vertices may increase One can draw the edge orthogonally Time complexity = O(n2) This Thesis Orthogonal point-set embedding 3-connected cubic planar graphs at most (5n+4)/2 bends in total Time complexity = O(n) Tight upper bound This Thesis Orthogonal point-set embedding with mapping 4-connected planar graphs at most 6n bends in total

  19. Contents • Problem Definition • Motivation • Previous Results and Our Results • Upward Point-Set Embedding

  20. 5 4 3 2 1 5 5 4 4 3 v3 v3 v5 v5 3 2 1 v1 v1 v2 v2 2 v4 v4 1 Upward Point-Set Embedding G Input S Upward Topological Book Embedding Upward Point-set Embedding

  21. Upward Topological Book Embedding b d a c G c Left Page Right Page d S Digraph b The vertices on the spine a The edges on the pages Upward Topological Book Embedding Spine

  22. Upward Topological Book Embedding G contains directed hamiltonian path G contains directed hamiltonian path 7 A directed path containing all the vertices 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 1 2 1

  23. Upward Topological Book Embedding G contains directed hamiltonian path G contains directed hamiltonian path 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 1 2 1

  24. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Upward Topological Book Embedding

  25. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Upward Topological Book Embedding 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

  26. The drawing ….. • has no edge crossings since • it has the same embedding • as the original graph • has no spine crossing • has 1 bend per edge 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Upward Topological Book Embedding 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

  27. Upward Topological Book Embedding G does not contain directed Hamiltonian path 7 6 5 e 4 b d c 3 2 a 1

  28. Upward Topological Book Embedding G does not contain directed Hamiltonian path 7 6 5 e 4 b d c 3 2 a 1

  29. Upward Topological Book Embedding G does not contain directed Hamiltonian path 7 6 5 e 4 b d c 3 2 a 1

  30. Upward Topological Book Embedding 7 7 6 6 5 e 5 e 4 4 d b d c c 3 b 2 a 3 1 a 2 1

  31. 7 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 e 5 e 4 4 4 d b d c c 3 b 2 a 3 3 1 a 2 2 1 1 Upward Topological Book Embedding Input digraph Each spine crossing corresponds to a dummy vertex

  32. Calculation of number of Bends j Spine crossing from i to j is at most j-i-2 j-1 The edge (1, n) has no crossings j-2 Spine Crossings per edge is at most n-4 i+2 i+1 i

  33. Calculation of number of Bends Spine crossing from i to j is at most j-i-2 The edge (1, n) has no crossings Spine Crossings per edge is at most n-4 Bends per edge is at most n-3

  34. Calculation of number of Bends Spine crossing from i to j is at most j-i-2 Total number of spine crossings =2(n-4)+3(n-5)+ . . . +k(n-2-k)+p(n-3-k) where p, k are integers Number of edges which crosses the spine={k(k+1)/2}-1+p The edge (1, n) has no crossings Spine Crossings per edge is at most n-4 Bends per edge is at most n-3

  35. Contents • Problem Definition • Motivation • Previous Results and Our Results • Upward Point-Set Embedding • Orthogonal Point-Set Embedding

  36. Orthogonal Point-Set Embedding 3-connected cubic planar graphs 4-connected planar graphs ( ≤ 4) 4-connected 4-regular planar graphs

  37. v5 v6 v3 v4 v7 v8 v2 v1 v10 v9 3-connected cubic planar graph 3-connected cubic planar graph G with HC

  38. v5 v6 v3 v4 v7 v8 v2 v1 v10 v9 3-connected cubic planar graph 3-connected cubic planar graph G with HC Plane embedding G’ of graph G point-set in the plane

  39. 3-connected cubic planar graph v5 v6 Inner edges v3 v4 v7 v8 v2 v1 v10 v9 Outer edges Plane embedding G’ of graph G

  40. 3-connected cubic planar graph v5 v6 v3 v4 v7 v8 v2 v1 v10 v9 Inner vertices Plane embedding G’ of graph G

  41. 3-connected cubic planar graph p10 p9 p8 v5 v6 p7 v3 v4 v7 v8 p6 p5 v2 v1 v10 v9 p4 p3 p2 p1

  42. 3-connected cubic planar graph p10 p9 p8 v5 v6 We have to consider two cases Case 1: Inner edges in left page Case 2 : Inner edges in right page p7 v3 v4 v7 v8 p6 p5 v2 v1 v10 v9 p4 p3 p2 p1 Case 1: Inner edges in left page

  43. 3-connected cubic planar graph p10 Nice points (L) p9 p8 v5 v6 p7 v3 v4 v7 v8 p6 p5 v2 v1 v10 v9 p4 p3 CountL= 6 p2 p1 Case 1: Inner edges in left page

  44. 3-connected cubic planar graph p10 p9 p8 v5 v6 p7 v3 v4 v7 v8 p6 Nice points (R) p5 v2 v1 v10 v9 p4 p3 CountL= 6 p2 CountR= 2 p1 Case 2: Inner edges in right page

  45. p10 p9 p8 v5 v6 p7 v3 v4 v7 v8 p6 p5 v2 v1 v10 v9 p4 p3 p2 p1 3-connected cubic planar graph CountL= 6 CountR= 2

  46. 3-connected cubic planar graph p10 Computation of number of bends p9 • From pigeonhole principle….. • Either countL or • countR is at • least = (n-2)/2 • which edges can • be drawn with 1 bend p8 v5 v6 Left nice points Total bends = 1.(n-2)/2+2.(3n/2-(n-2)/2-1)+3 = n/2-1+3n-n+2-2+3 = n/2+2n+2 = (5n+4)/2 p7 v3 v4 v7 v8 p6 p5 v2 v1 v10 v9 Right nice points p4 p3 p2 p1

  47. 6 5 4 3 2 1 4-connected planar graph v2 v4 v3 v6 v1 v5 4-connected planar graph G Point-set S

  48. 6 5 4 3 2 1 4-connected planar graph v2 v4 v3 v6 v1 v5 Plane embedding G’ of graph G Point-set S

  49. 6 v6 v2 5 v4 v5 v3 4 v4 v6 3 v1 v5 v3 2 v2 1 v1 4-connected planar graph Outer edges Inner edges Plane embedding G’ of graph G

  50. v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 4-connected planar graph Outer edges v2 v4 v3 Inner edges v6 v1 v5

More Related