1 / 12

UNCOVER – Case study Barents Sea

UNCOVER – Case study Barents Sea. Bjarte Bogstad, IMR, Bergen, Norway. Participants. IMR, Bergen, Norway PINRO, Murmansk, Russia University of Aberdeen, UK University of Bergen, Norway CEFAS, Lowestoft, UK IFM, Hirtshals, Denmark IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria. Species. Cod Herring

olga-leblanc
Download Presentation

UNCOVER – Case study Barents Sea

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UNCOVER – Case study Barents Sea Bjarte Bogstad, IMR, Bergen, Norway

  2. Participants • IMR, Bergen, Norway • PINRO, Murmansk, Russia • University of Aberdeen, UK • University of Bergen, Norway • CEFAS, Lowestoft, UK • IFM, Hirtshals, Denmark • IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria

  3. Species • Cod • Herring • Capelin

  4. WP1 • Time series of total egg production for cod and herring (R. Nash) • Maternal effects for herring (A. Geffen) • Fisheries induced evolution (U. Dieckmann) • Changes in herring distribution over 50 years (A. Krysov) • IBM for migration of adult herring based on behavioral model and 3D ocean models (G. Huse)

  5. WP2 • Effect of climate on cod and herring recruitment (O. Titov) • Life cycle strategy of cod (V. Tretyak) • Larval growth (A. Folkvord) • Cod recruitment forecast (O. Titov) • Process knowledge in IBMs (ECOBE) (Ø. Fiksen) • Recovery scenarios modelling first half year of life (S. Sundby)

  6. WP3 • Fit Gadget (IMR) and STOCOBAR (PINRO) to historical data (B. Bogstad/A. Filin) • Description of temporal/spatial changes in predation by cod (A. Dolgov/B. Bogstad) • Improve Gadget/STOCOBAR cod predation models (B. Bogstad/A. Filin) • Note: Gadget model output from BECAUSE

  7. WP4 • Identify data, information and models relevant to recovery questions (D. Howell/ Y. Kovalev/ T. Marshall) • Develop operational framework (FEMS) modules accordingly (D. Howell/ Y. Kovalev/ T. Marshall/L. Kell)

  8. WP5 • Interviews with stakeholders (D. Wilson) • Describe compliance and legitimacy expectation (D. Wilson) • Note that stakeholders are Nor-Russ. Fisheries Commission (cod, capelin) and Norway, Russia, Iceland, Faroes and EU (herring)

More Related