150 likes | 410 Views
Foam for mobility control in alkaline surfactant EOR process. Wei Yan George J. Hirasaki Clarence A. Miller. Outline. Bulk foam apparent viscosity in fractures Foam stability with the presence of residual oil Salinity and Calcium tolerance of NI blend
E N D
Foam for mobility control in alkaline surfactant EOR process Wei Yan George J. Hirasaki Clarence A. Miller
Outline • Bulk foam apparent viscosity in fractures • Foam stability with the presence of residual oil • Salinity and Calcium tolerance of NI blend • Alkaline-surfactant-polymer-foam flooding in vertical silicone sand pack
Model for bulk foam apparent viscosity Crowding factor Viscosity of continuous phase Internal circulation factor Viscosity of dispersed phase
Pal’s Model matches the experimental results for bulk foam apparent viscosity
3 % surfactant + 1% Na2CO3 , 1 week 10 9 8 Phase boundary 7 Clear solution 6 2 clear phases % NaCl 5 Precipitate of surf. 4 Cloudy solution 1-Phase Region 3 * 2 * 1 * 0 * 1:1 4:1 9:1 IOS-15/18 N67-7PO S N67-7PO S:IOS-15/18 (w/w) NI Surfactant Blends Improve Salt Tolerance * Cloudy after 9 months.
Experimental procedure for ASPF flooding • Fill the sand pack with crude oil • Brine flood until no oil comes out • Na2CO3/NI-blend/Polymer flood for 0.5PV • IOS/Polymer flood for 0.2PV • Foam (fg = 0.67) flood as drive
Conclusions • Bulk foam apparent viscosity at medium to low gas fractional flow can be described by semi-empirical model. • IOS is a good foamer with the presence of residual crude oil • NI blend can improve the surfactant’s tolerance to calcium and salinity • Foam drive can be used to replace polymer drive in alkaline-surfactant-polymer process