120 likes | 125 Views
This study explores how hotel CSM competence (functional and emotional) influences meeting planner's perceptions of relationship quality and intention to repurchase. Examining individual-individual level in the BTB context.
E N D
Meeting Planner Loyalty to CSMs: A Model for Investigating CSM Emotional & Functional Competence in the BTB Exchange M. Holm; D. Breiter; D. Dickson; D. Joseph; J. Hahm; & J. Kang
Background • MICE Industry Direct Contribution to GDP ≈ $115 billion. (CIC, 2010a) • Increase in Face-to-Face Meetings Changes the Service Landscape. (Pofeldt, 2015a) • Perceptions of Turnover from Sales to Service in the Venue. (Lutz, 2011)
Problem Statement • Lack of theoretical foundation to explain how meeting planners form repeat purchase intentions in BTB exchange. • Minimal research in BTB context, specifically when investigating individual-individual level. • Functional competencies of hotel CSMs absent from the literature. • Emotional competence underexplored as antecedent to relationship quality in BTB context. • Interpersonal related factors (i.e. likability toward the supplier – individual level) underexplored in BTB context.
Purpose & Objectives • Investigate how hotel CSM competency performance (functional and emotional) influence meeting planner’s perceptions of relationship quality with the CSM and their intention to repurchase at the property.
Significance of Study • Establish a set of functional competence items to evaluate hotel CSMs. • Empirically test functional and emotional competence as antecedents to relationship quality in a BTB exchange. • Individual-individual vs. organization-organization. • Refine relationship quality as a construct in BTB context. • Adding likability as a new dimension, with trust and commitment. • Offer insight into the role of the hotel CSM in the rebooking process.
Functional Competence • Meeting & Business Event Competency Standards. (Cecil et al., 2013) • KSA’s for meeting professionals. • Vendor Competencies. (Ford & Peeper, 2009) • KSA’s for DMOs. • International CSMs. (McCabe & Weeks, 2008) • Critical differences in how client is serviced.
Emotional Competence • EC is composed of the following dimensions: • Well-being, self-control, emotionality, and sociability. (Petrides, 2009) • “Ability to carry out accurate reasoning about emotions and the ability to use emotions and emotional knowledge to enhance thought.” (Mayer et al., 2008, p. 511) • Service encounter suitable for measuring EC because of affective processes exchanged. (Bitner et al,. 1990; Liljander & Strandvik, 1997; Mattila & Enz, 2002; Grandey et al., 2005) • Can be developed/enhanced in the workplace & help build loyalty.(Giardini & Frese, 2008; Delcourt et al., 2010; Kotsu et al., 2011)
Relationship Quality • Rooted in Social Exchange Theory (SET). (Blau, 1964) • Composed of the following dimensions: • Trust, Commitment, and Likability (Morgan & Hunt, 1994; Liden & Maslyn, 1998). • Relationship starts in service encounter – repeated encounters form exchange, which forms relationship. (Gutek et al., 1999) • Exchange integral to how client perceives the firm and the employee. (Lambe et al., 2001) • Loyalty evidence of successful exchange in BTB context. (Jayawardhena et al., 2007).
Repeat Purchase Intention • Intention forged by relationship quality with supplier (serves as motivation to repurchase), through a series of successful encounters. (Barduskaite, 2014) • Behavioral Loyalty • Intentions are successive stages of behavior, not one in the same, where intentions are viewed as an effective indicator of loyalty. (Zeithaml et al., 1996; Weber, 2001b).
Hypotheses • H1: Hotel CSM functional competence is positively related to meeting planner’s perceptions of relationship quality. • H2: Hotel CSM emotional competence is positively related to meeting planner’s perceptions of relationship quality. • H3: Relationship quality is a second-order latent construct that reflects the first-order factors of: trust, commitment, and likability. • H4: Meeting planner perceptions of relationship quality with hotel CSM is positively related to RPI property. • H5: Meeting planner perceptions of relationship quality with hotel CSM is positively related to RPI CSM.
Proposed Theoretical Model H1 (+) H3 H4 (+) H5 (+) H2 (+)
Thank You • Questions or Comments?