1 / 12

DQ03DR090 High Pressure Coolant Pump Failure VQ Crankshaft Machining

DQ03DR090 High Pressure Coolant Pump Failure VQ Crankshaft Machining. Concerns. 6 failures/yr = $47,484.00 in pump replacement costs 72 hours production loss / 216 man hours of maintenance labor during the last year Sumitomo was used.

omar
Download Presentation

DQ03DR090 High Pressure Coolant Pump Failure VQ Crankshaft Machining

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DQ03DR090 High Pressure Coolant Pump Failure VQCrankshaft Machining

  2. Concerns • 6 failures/yr = $47,484.00 in pump replacement costs • 72 hours production loss / 216 man hours of maintenance labor during the last year Sumitomo was used. • 12 month average rate of failure was 1 pump every 2 months. • Excessive motor / pump noise.

  3. Cause & Effect Diagram: Man Material Coolant Type Filter Changes Coolant Temperature Pump Failure Tight Tolerance Pump Inadequate Filtration FTL Type Operation Filter Replacement Frequency Machine Method

  4. Why #1 Why did we have pump failures? • The coolant system was filtered to 25 microns and used a non-repairable Sumitomo Gear Pump. • Due to the tight tolerance of the gear pump Sumitomo suggested 10 micronfiltration to guarantee long-term reliability.

  5. Why #2?Why didn’t we replace the 25 micron filters with 10 micron filters? The flow rate needed for the high pressure system was too large to use 10 micron filters without excessive size and cost increase. Therefore the only improvement alternative was to replace the pump.

  6. Improvement # 1 • Replace the Sumitomo gear pump with a Knoll screw pump. Improved reliability Toyota currently uses Knoll pumps with zero failures in 5+ years.

  7. Improvement # 2 Replace the loud pump motor with a quiet, efficient motor. • Motor horsepower reduced from 50hp to 40hp. • Noise reduced by 10+ decibels. • Need for a sound reduction shroud eliminated, reducing the amount of time to access the motor. • Original • New Style

  8. Sumitomo requires 10 micron filtration. Filter upgrade required. Sumitomo cost $7,914.0 Sumitomo is non-repairable Sumitomo lead time is 60 days Knoll is capable of handling contamination up to 50 microns. No filter upgrades needed. Knoll cost $6,924.00 Knoll is easily repairable. Knoll lead time is 48 hours. Pump Comparison

  9. Complete drop in Assembly • Knoll designed and manufactured a complete drop in assembly for safe/easy installation. • The cost was $10,700 each for a total initial investment of $21,400. • At a failure rate of 6 pumps/year the Return On Investment was 2.7 months.

  10. $26,084 replacement savings the first year. $47,484 each of the following years. Additional benefits of this activity 5 year projection • Replacement cost savings $216,020 • Labor cost savings $50,350

  11. Knowledge Sharing Facts and knowledge of this improvement will be shared with other Nissan Machining Facilities through Horizontal Deployment via GMR.

  12. Questions / Comments

More Related