1 / 37

Fitting cows to your environment Harvey Freetly U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA

Fitting cows to your environment Harvey Freetly U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA. Outputs Inputs. Efficiency = . Outputs Inputs. Efficiency = . Economic efficiency may not equate to biological efficiency. Factors effecting efficiency. Feed efficiency Production life.

omer
Download Presentation

Fitting cows to your environment Harvey Freetly U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fitting cows to your environmentHarvey FreetlyU.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA

  2. Outputs Inputs Efficiency =

  3. Outputs Inputs Efficiency = Economic efficiency may not equate to biological efficiency

  4. Factors effecting efficiency • Feed efficiency • Production life Biological Management • Matching feed resources to requirements • Labor

  5. Management decisions can affect cow efficiency Adjust production cycle to match forage

  6. Annual metabolizable energy requirement

  7. Annual metabolizable energy requirement 15% Milk 8% Fetus 13% Activity Maintenance 64%

  8. Given the majority of the annual feed is used for maintenance, what are the factors that contribute to the cost of maintenance?

  9. A cow is at maintenance when she is neither gaining or losing energy (No change in body weight) Inputs (feed energy) = Outputs (heat energy)

  10. Synthesis Degradation Tissues in the cow’s body are constantly be degraded and synthesized Food Heat Synthesis and degradation are not 100% efficient

  11. Factors affecting maintenance • Cow size • Milk production potential • Genetics

  12. The more tissue that is maintained, the more food energy is required to maintain the tissue Bigger cows take more feed to maintain their weight

  13. Cow size increase maintenance requirement 6 lb hay

  14. Selecting for bigger calf weaning weights typically increases cow size and the amount of feed required to maintain a cow

  15. Bending the growth curve

  16. Big cows are not bad (Desirable cow size depends on available resources) Charolais – 1488 lb Simmental – 1301 lb Angus – 1179 lb Hereford – 1261 lb Jenkins and Ferrell, 1994

  17. Increased milk potential is correlated with an increased maintenance in nonpregnant, nonlactating cows Ferrell and Jenkins, 1987

  18. A five pound increase in peak milk yield is correlated with a ~ 17% increase in maintenance

  19. The increase in milk production is associated with an increase in liver weight

  20. Ferrell and Jenkins, 1984

  21. Management decisions determine the amount of cow weight that is maintained at a given time of year

  22. Maintaining lighter weight cows 1400 lb BCS 5 Cow

  23. Nonpregnant-, nonlactating-cows (224 d) (112 d) (112 d) Freetly and Nienaber (1998) JAS 76:896-905

  24. Energy retention in pregnant cow feed restricted during the second trimester and refeed restricted feed allocation in the third trimester Second Trimester Third Trimester Total Freetly et al. (2008) JAS 86:370

  25. Genetic variation in the ability of cows to adjust their metabolic rate to different levels of feed intake 0.0193 Jenkins et al., 1991

  26. Synthesis Synthesis Degradation Degradation Restricted feed Full feed

  27. Milk The second largest annual energy expenditure is for milk. Feed required by the cow increases with increased milk.

  28. Milk • Milk yield • Persistency of lactation

  29. Efficiency of milk production in first-calf beef cows Efficiency = 0.73 Freetly et al., 2006

  30. Persistency of milk production can affect weaning weights Freetly and Cundiff, 1998

  31. Persistency of milk production can affect weaning weights Freetly and Cundiff, 1998

  32. There is considerable biological diversity among cows for maintenance and milk production

  33. Development of marker-assisted technologies offer an opportunity to select cows for difficult to measure traits like maintenance

  34. Fitting cows to your operation requires defining the your resources and market end points and then fitting the biological type to your environment

  35. A good cow in one production environment may not be a good cow in another environment

  36. Take advantage of the diversity that different types of cows offer in establishing a cow herd

More Related